Earlier this month, on Nov. 4, an estimated 200,000 people in Indonesia — the world's most populous Muslim-majority nation — joined a protest in front of the presidential palace calling for the ouster of Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (popularly known as “Ahok”), whom hardline Muslim leaders accuse of committing blasphemy.
The rally, organized by the conservative Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), eventually turned violent, and many have since compared the unrest to riots that rocked Jakarta, the country’s capital, in 1998.
Ahok is a Chinese Christian politician who allegedly insulted Islam by citing some passages from the Quran about electing non-Muslims. Ahok’s speech citing the holy Muslim text was recorded on video, which later transcribed with an error that outraged Muslims and used by his opponents against him.
Moderate Islamic clerics from the Nadhlatul Ulama (Indonesia's largest Islamic organization), Muhammadiyah (Indonesia's second largest Islamic organization), and the Grand Imam of Istiqlal Jakarta Mosque (the largest mosque in Southeast Asia) have stated publicly that Ahok didn't insult Islam, in their view, but fundamentalist clerics insist that the governor is guilty of blasphemy, demanding his removal from office by holding a massive protest on Nov. 4.
Indeed, thousands joined the protest in defense of Islam, but some analysts have noted that the rally also attracted the support of thousands more who were evicted from their homes because of Ahok’s aggressive demolition campaign against slum dwellers. Aside from this, Ahok is also known to be the first high-ranking official who formally asked the Home Affairs Ministry to ban the activities of the FPI.
Weeks before the protest, racist messages directed against Ahok circulated online and offline. For example, the pamphlet below asks readers if they would support Ahok's assassination.
#AksiDamai411 itu hanya di bibir, yel-yel, orasi, spanduk, poster isinya tebarkan kebencian dan kekerasan pic.twitter.com/473zkf5H4N
— Ulin Yusron (@ulinyusron) November 4, 2016
#peaceprotest411 was an empty promise. Speeches, banners, posters filled with hate and violence are circulating.
Extremist groups like Syrian jihadists have reportedly encouraged followers to punish Ahok and by “igniting” a holy war in Indonesia.
The protest, which was held primarily in the city center, reached the residential areas in the northern part of Jakarta, where Ahok lives. Public facilities were destroyed and corner shops looted, spreading fear among locals, and triggering #safetycheckjakarta on Twitter (for the second time this year, after the Jakarta bombing attack in January). The violence compares to riots in 1998, when an angry mob looted and burned down many Chinese-Indonesian shops.
@DivHumasPolri @TMCPoldaMetro #safetycheckjakarta https://t.co/i1kFN8D4T9
— #AhokDahsyat (@cintaindonesia2) November 4, 2016
A friend's windshield was pelted by rocks because he, the driver, has slanted eyes. Glass door of a restaurant in Muara Karang also pelted by rocks.
As the protest slowly dispersed, Indonesian President Joko Widodo expressed regret about the violence and condemned the “political actors” who he says exploited the situation to spread chaos. The president subsequently ordered the military not to tolerate further acts of provocation that could divide the nation.
Sudah terbukti bahwa Demo hari ini bukan Demo Bela Agama. Lihat saja tuntutan para demonstran. Mereka juga ingin MELENGSERKAN JOKOWI!!
— #NO2ISIS (@TolakBigotRI) November 4, 2016
The fact is that today's protest was not to defend our religion. Just listen to what they demanded. They want Jokowi to step down.
The police promptly arrested suspects accused of robbing local stores and attacking officers.
There is also speculation that the protest was meant to discredit Ahok, who is currently leading in the surveys ahead of local elections in Jakarta, set for next year.
Indonesian Islamic Scholar Sumanto Al Qurtuby, who is based in Saudi Arabia, questioned the motives of the rally organizers in a Facebook post that soon went viral:
Kalian mengklaim “jihad konstitusional” membela negara tetapi kau injak-injak dan lecehkan fondasi kenegaraan dan konstitusi negara. Kalian abaikan prosedur hukum, tata-cara berhukum, dan proses menjalankan hukum. […]
Kalian mengklaim jihad membela Islam tetapi kau injak-injak norma-norma dan etika keislaman. Kau abaikan ahlak dan moralitas keislaman. Perilakumu yang beringas seperti orang kesurupan, tindakanmu yang ngawur seperti orang kesetanan, dan perkataanmu yang kotor-njetor seperti got empang adalah sudah lebih dari cukup untuk membuktikan bahwa kalian ini tidak membela Islam. […]
Apa yang kalian lakukan sesungguhnya bukan jihad membela Islam, Al-Qur'an, apalagi membela Tuhan. Apa yang kalian lakukan sebenarnya adalah jihad membela egomu, membela kepentingan kelompokmu, membela parpolmu, membela tokoh dan idolamu, membela ormas Islammu, membela nafsu-serakah kekuasaanmu.
You claimed it was a “constitutional jihad” to defend the country, but you've disgraced the nation's foundations and constitution. You ignored the legal procedures, legal manners, and processes.
You claimed that it was jihad to defend Islam, yet you disgrace Islamic norms and ethics. You ignored Islamic morals and moralities. Your actions were rabid, as if possessed by evil, and your foul words are clear evidence that you weren't defending Islam.
What you did was not jihad in defense of Islam, Al-Qur'an, or God. What you did was jihad to defend your ego, to defend your Islamic organization, your greed, and power-thirsty selves.
Blasphemy is normal. Normal people blaspheme routinely and there no attacks, no lootings.
The religiously pious are more than a danger to normal society; their attacks are a certainty. To a certainty, the pious will attack. And, to them, no one is innocent. “They rejected Allah and the Paradise. They pay with their lives, as they shall burn in hellfire in the hereafter, for rejecting Allah and His Mercy.” Or some other gibberish about forcing reality to conform to make-believe.
For this reason, the pious should be confined geographically, and quarantined for the public good. This is essentially a project to erect the walls of an insane asylum around them, so they can’t hurt us. This is their fault, not ours.
The Islamic insistence that God loves them so much that they are compelled to murder and maim is a transparent pretext for piracy. And pretty much explains why the supremacist Ideology of Acquisition through Jihad bears close to no resemblance to any actual religion.
Ban Islam, it venerates a Fat White Dwarf!
Muhammad the white fat dwarf as stated in Islamic texts!
And did you know Muhammad was White, it is in the Islamic texts for everyone to read!
David Wood presents the facts very well!
Also did you know Muhammad was a fat dwarf? Islamic texts tells us so!