Close

Support Global Voices

To stay independent, free, and sustainable, our community needs the help of friends and readers like you.

Donate now »

See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

This Is How a Russian School Principal Talked to Her Students About Patriotism

Principal Kira Gribanovskaya drops some truth bombs on her foolish pupils. Photo: Alexey Navalny

At a school outside Bryansk, about 350 miles southwest of Moscow, the principal sat down last week with a class of students to talk about anti-corruption activist and opposition leader Alexey Navalny.

Why the sudden heart-to-heart? Police had just grabbed Maxim Losyev, one of the school’s students, straight out of the classroom for urging classmates to attend an unsanctioned demonstration on March 26 calling for an investigation into corruption allegations against Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Losyev also created a student group in support of Alexey Navalny, whose Anti-Corruption Foundation published an investigation earlier this month accusing Medvedev of masterminding a vast and illicit private empire.

In an effort to prevent further activism, the school’s principal — reportedly a woman named Kira Petrovna Gribanovskaya, referring to herself in the third person — discouraged the class from supporting Navalny, and even questioned the room’s intelligence and patriotism, when students challenged her assertion that Russia is in the middle of a “civil war.”

One of the students recorded the meeting with Gribanovskaya, and leaked the footage on social media. This weekend, the news site Meduza transcribed the nine-minute encounter. You can read the Russian transcript here, and listen to the Russian audio below.

* * *

Principal: Raisa Aleksandrova [the homeroom teacher], may I say something? This is for those who have taken an interest in Navalny’s activities: Okay, he proposes that we smear our top leaders. He says, “No to corruption” and so on. But what specific actions does he propose? Assemble for a protest? Tell [Medvedev] what a jerk he is?

Student 1: He just wants answers. He filmed a video about Medvedev, and he wants answers from the authorities.

Principal: And so what?

Student 1: And the authorities are silent.

Principal: No, hold on. If you film a video about Kira Petrovna, and write about how she’s this way and that way, how she’s not doing her job, and how there are cockroaches running around all over the school, and you come out to protest, demanding answers — do you think I’ll come out to have a conversation with you?

Student 2: No.

Principal: And he [Medvedev] won’t, either! It’s a joke! A political platform is about concrete actions: strengthening the economy, developing various plans. What Navalny is doing is a pure provocation. Do you get it? You still don’t understand this. I’ll tell you this straight: right now, our economic situation is very unstable. It’s an economic pit. And why’s all this happening? You’ve taken social studies and all that. You know that we’re basically living under an economic blockade in this country. But I want to hear what you think. What’s going on right now?

Student 2: A crisis.

Principal: And what’s causing this crisis?

[Unintelligible voices]

Student 2: Sanctions, the European Union, this whole blockade.

Principal: One more time — what’s the cause? The European Union, right? And our leader is managing a very stable and very strong policy. He has an enormously high rating on the world stage. Due to what? Due to foreign policy. [Russia’s] domestic policy, of course, is rather weak. Why? Well, because there’s no money. And we’re feeling that now, most of all…

Student 2: And what exactly is our foreign policy? America is against us. Europe is against us.

Principal: And why’s that? Tell me: what’s the reason?

Student 2: Because of Crimea. We basically took it.

Principal: And do you think that’s bad?

Homeroom teacher: But did we really take it? There was a referendum there…

Principal: Okay, tell me what happened, from your point of view. I actually want to know. Tell me. Maybe there’s some side to this that I don’t know.

Student 2: I mean, why did they impose sanctions against us?

Principal: You just answered your own question a moment ago.

Homeroom teacher: As a show of force. Because they wanted to show their strength.

Student 2: Because of Crimea.

Principal: You know why… And why did the whole war in Ukraine start in the first place?

Student 2: Well, because of the revolution…

Principal: Because of the what?

Student 2: The transition of power.

Principal: Kid, you haven’t read anything about this and you don’t know a thing. You’ve got some very superficial knowledge here. What started this whole conflict? Maybe it was because America stuck its nose in?

Student 2: It didn’t intervene openly.

[Unintelligible voices]

Principal: And Crimea up and went where? And how did America react to this?

Student 2: Did you see American troops in Ukraine?

Principal: And did you see Russian troops in Ukraine?

Student 2: Yes. There are videos going around — you have no idea.

Principal: The videos are staged, for starters.

Homeroom teacher: And you shouldn’t believe them…

[Unintelligible voices]

Student 2: I’ve heard a lot of information that friends of certain people are there…

Principal: Guys, I can see that you’re looking at this problem one-sidedly. And that you lack range in your political view. It’s a very narrow problem: you see Navalny, you watch his video, and — boom — you believe it all. You don’t have your own opinion about this issue — only what’s being imposed on you. And so sometimes you embrace sources that are unverified or maybe even outright provocative.

Homeroom teacher: Like puppets…

Student 2: And what if our opinion coincides with his?

Principal: But do you even have an opinion? You go ahead and read. I’m pushing you not just to look at these sources… If they say that, yeah, it’s bad here, then look at other sources.

Homeroom teacher: Challenge every fact!

Student 2: Okay, but we’re not looking at a single source.

Principal: Well, apparently you’re only looking in a single direction.

Student 1: Yeah and our TV networks only show what’s good for the government…

Principal: You’re not listening to Voice of America?

Student 1: They [Russian TV networks] aren’t going to show us anything else.

Principal: I got it. Somehow, we messed up your civic education. In terms of civics, you’ve got big shortcomings. Do you all mean to tell me that there are no patriots in your class?

Student: And what does it mean to be a patriot? That you support the authorities?

Principal: I was speaking to Nikita…

Homeroom teacher: I apologize. [Students], please, organize a neighborhood clean-up group on your streets.

Principal: Guys, raise your hands: how many of you do any volunteer work?

[Silence]

Principal: And what’s volunteering for? There’s your civic position! You don’t need to be looking down from on high at Putin and Medvedev. Look at our neighborhood!

Student 2: And the volunteering that’s organized and supported by United Russia [the country’s ruling political party]?

Principal: Yes.

Student 2: Well, we’re against United Russia.

[Laughter]

Student 2: You see.

Homeroom teacher: Why do you say “we”?

Student 2: Raise your hand, anybody who’s against United Russia.

Student 1: I’m against them.

[Other voices: Is that everyone? Anyone else?]

Student 2: We’re against United Russia.

Principal: And you’re for what exactly?

Student 1: We’re for justice.

Principal: And what exactly is justice?

Student: It’s what we don’t have right now.

Student 1: Justice is when the authorities care about their people, and not just about themselves. When they care about ordinary citizens, and not about their millions [of dollars]. Many people want to live in a free state, in a free country…

Principal: So you think that life in this country got worse with the arrival of Putin and Medvedev?

Student 1: No, but they’ve stayed too long. They’ve just been there [in power] for too long.

Student 2: Yeah.

Principal: Did you live in some other era that I somehow missed? Under whom did you live well? And under Putin and Medvedev things got worse for you?

Student 2: We’ve studied history.

Principal: Naturally.

Student 2: Well…

Principal: What does “well” mean? I’m asking you, specifically you: Under what ruler did you live well? What do you mean “well”?

Student 2: We’ve only ever had one ruler, actually.

Principal: You said that things have become worse. But you never lived through the hard years of the 1990s. When, forgive me for saying this, everyone carried around a blade and a firearm, and the country was in chaos. And this was when I was studying in college! This was when it was scary to go out into the street after eight at night. You didn’t see this.

Student 2: And you want that all over again?

Homeroom teacher: You’re the ones who want that!

Student 2: They just arrested a person for absolutely nothing. They carried him off to the police station.

Principal: This is civil war.

Student 2: This is lawlessness.

Principal: That’s true — it’s lawlessness. Because what is the aim of any protest or any schism?

Homeroom teacher: Political crisis, and then civil war.

Principal: And then civil war. Fratricide.

Homeroom teacher: You want it to be like in Ukraine? Or like it was for us in [19]17?

Student 2: We don’t want these officials.

Homeroom teacher: Tell me: can you actually do this right now? How?

Student 2: Well, just gather together.

Homeroom teacher: And then when?

Student 2: There will be a crowd.

Homeroom teacher: A crowd. And then what?

Student 2: People will at least see. They’ll see that there are citizens.

Homeroom teacher: Citizens. In other words, a bunch of [young] people led by adults with nothing to lose, so to speak.

Principal: Guys, we tried, at least, to warn you about all this, and let you know. What’s happening now is called polemics, and nobody needs it. Regardless, what you need now… I’m advising you, I’m not insisting, but I’m advising that you listen to what we said, and you draw your own conclusions. More than anything, I’m thinking about your future.

Homeroom teacher: Remember that a lot is at stake.

Principal: I put up a fight with these law enforcement officers. I tried to defend Maxim. I said that these were just some juvenile antics that nobody needed. Believe me, he’s not having a good time right now. Not at all. I don’t want any of you to land in a similar situation. Everything that you’ve said here from behind your desks has been empty words. I’m telling you again: get up, grow up, and make something of yourselves. That’s the right thing to do.

Homeroom teacher: Guys, I’ll ask you again: think, think…

The news site Meduza transcribed the encounter found above. You can read the Russian transcript here.

57 comments

  • Jack Bluebird

    It is hard for even educated teachers to explain the failure of naive youngster thinking. They have been around for too little of a time and have basically no recollections of the horrors from the 90s when crooked gorbachev and his Belazheva drunk and gangster yeltsin gambled the hard work of the last 70 years that Soviets made and sold his country to oligarchs. They never lived tough that to appreciate and understand tat Putins Russia although not perfect and definitely in need of criminal bureaocratic cleansing is far better than what was when “freedom and democracy” ruled Russia.

    You see young Russian people it is easy to argue that Navalny is great and all but the truth is that someone like him would bend on to every demand EU and US made towards Russia. Following that you would soon be surrounded by missile sites and NATO members from all around Russia. Russia would definitely dissolve in 3 or 4 states if west had its way. It has even been discussed in details by the top US administration.

    Having naive leaders was a never a smart choice for any country and much less Russia. It is not Russian problem though. It is the politics of the west that has pushed Russia into this position. And believe me once west gets its “color revolution” as they did in Middle East and North Africa things go south for every country after that.

    So what should you do? Well you should definitely fight against the corruption. Medvedev isnt a superhuman or irreplaceable and he and others like him can be disposed of as they should be. But be very conscious about western intentions. They are far different from what they say.

    Putin should work hard on getting corruption out of every part of Russian society. Corruption is like a well hidden disease at the start which eats society inside out. It demoralizes people and it makes them lose faith in their own nation especially when the times get tough. So to fight against corruption is a nr. 1 priority of every true leader who loves his nation. No amount of rich friends is worth the legacy that gorbachev and yeltsin left behind as they will always be remembered like two men who betrayed USSR and Russia and their people for private interest.

    Stay smart Russia. it is better for everyone and mostly for you that way.

    • you must be either very naive or on the russian payroll

      • Jack Bluebird

        Unfortunately neither.

    • Karl Viatuitas

      15 years of Midget Tsar Rule and Russia is full of foreign agents and at the brink of instability and dissolution?In Spite of getting Trump in the Whitehouse?
      Didn’t the Kremlin say that the sanctions won’t do nothing , that Russia is strong?
      Or was he full of hot air all this time?

      • Jack Bluebird

        Trump in White house does not matter. Even if Russia did influence the elections they will not benefit in any way from it. Trump is very militaristic type of person and a very big narcissist also. He could care less for Russia.

        Kremlin can do something to offset the sanctions but not in the short run. I will not bother to explain for who knows how many times why that is not physically possible for any government to do and not just Putin.

    • Гостья из будущего

      Dear Jack,
      Thank you for your friendly message and undersanding. It is so hard to watch how your children, your students. your compatriots are groving traitors, stupid and unresponsable.
      About corruption in Russia – it is not something special. The great Russian classic said about Russia: “They steal” (Just one word in Russian). Some of Russian people are noble and honest, some – steal. I don’t know the proportion, but amoung my own beloved friends there are may be 30% who steal. I think It is something typical, slavic. You can feel it very well in Prague (for example).
      Our problem is that foreign countries give the home for our biggest thiefs and help them to hide the stollen money.
      The majority of Russian people support Putin, same as they supported USSR. But the fish is rotting from the Head and if the traitors manage to dismiss Putin, the civil war will begin, because we don’t have alternative leaders who could be accepted by people.
      Hope he understand this and protect his power very well.

      • Jack Bluebird

        Hopefully your young ones will open their eyes and learn from their countries history or someone will stop them from making crucial mistakes which cannot be undone.

        As for the corruption it is definitely a thing that should not be accepted especially at the highest level which represents interests of a nation and most people. If it is not dealt with harshly it can bring great division in a society.

        I think that Putin is well aware of this but he cannot do everything by himself. Until conscious of managers in society has grown enough to say “enough” there will always be excuses for revolution and machinations financed by the west. That is why it is of utmost importance to force those corrupted out of the way of progress. Russian people deserve better.

        USSR was a great country which provided more stable environment for Russia in my opinion. Its dissolution is definitely as a treason in my opinion since Soviet people overwhelmingly voted to keep USSR in March of 1991. I believe that gorbachev and belazheva gang actually took money from the west to destroy it. It is a very big shame that proud Soviets didnt have a detailed analysis of what happened and why gorbachev pretended like he didnt know from the KGB that belazheva trio is about to hold an illegal meeting on destroying a USSR.

  • […] are dissatisfied – a point made by students in the south-western region Bryansk, who recorded an argument with their teachers and circulated it on social […]

  • […] are dissatisfied – a point made by students in the south-western region Bryansk, who recorded an argument with their teachers and circulated it on social […]

  • […] dissatisfied – a point made by students in the south-western region Bryansk, who recorded an argument with their teachers and circulated it on social […]

  • […] are dissatisfied – a point made by students in the south-western region Bryansk, who recorded an argument with their teachers and circulated it on social […]

  • […] dissatisfied – a point made by students in the south-western region Bryansk, who recorded an argument with their teachers and circulated it on social […]

  • […] a attiré l’attention de l’opinion publique après la diffusion d’une vidéo sur YouTube. On peut y voir un lycéen discuter avec un de ses professeurs après […]

  • […] за това е видео, в което директорката на училището в Брянск, на около […]

  • Wolfticket

    Welcome to the 1930s people.

  • gvravel

    Sounds like the students have mastered “critical thinking” in the face of authority figures. Now, if only Trumpkins could do the same thing.

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site