Morocco: A Country Divided Over Gaza
As a quorum of Arab leaders convene in Doha today, the world is wondering how their meeting might bring about a cessation of hostilities in Gaza. Yesterday, the news broke that King Mohammed VI of Morocco would not be attending the Doha or any other summit, stating that “they will not do much to help the Palestinian people.”
The View from Fez had more details on the king's absence:
A press release of the king's office said on Wednesday the decision is due to objective reasons and sad considerations relating to the depressing Arab situation, whose deterioration has reached an unprecedented level in the history of Arab joint action.
The mere fact of proposing the convening of an Arab summit now gives rise to squabbling and outbidding tactics, even disputes between Arab countries, the release said, noting that sadly, these secondary disagreements eclipse the vital causes of the Ummah, particularly the Palestinian question, and obscure the very essence of the conflict in the region and play into the hands of the true enemies of the Arab world.
The communiqué notes that this atmosphere of disunity gives the Arab public opinion the impression that there are attempts to secure exclusive leadership of the Arab world or create specific axes or zones of influence, a prospect Morocco has always sought to avoid.
Moroccan blogger Taha Belafrej [fr] also commented on King Mohammed VI's lack of participation, saying:
Dans un communiqué du Cabinet Royal diffusé par la MAP, des explications sont données à cette non participation.
Voici un extrait de ce communiqué:
“Quelle que soit la réalité objective et douloureuse des graves agressions externes, nous nous devons d'être francs avec nous-mêmes et de reconnaître que le problème réside dans le corps arabe lui-même et que, partant, la solution est à trouver, d'abord, chez les arabes eux-mêmes”.
In a statement circulated to the Royal Cabinet by MAP [Maghreb Arab Presse, the state news agency], explanations are given regarding his lack of participation.
Here is an excerpt from this release:
“Whatever the objective reality of the serious and painful external aggression, we must be frank with ourselves and recognize that the problem lies in the Arab body itself and that therefore, the solution must be found, first, among the Arabs themselves.”
Ibn Kafka [fr], in response to the full statement from the Moroccan government (available on MAP's web site in French), states that “any comment is superfluous,” going on to say very little else.
One commenter expresses disappointment in Ibn Kafka's lack of analysis, saying:
Je visite ce blog depuis quelques semaines. Et je suis frappé de ne trouver aucune analyse, aucun rappel historique, aucune approche politique.
De la part d’un juriste, je trouve que cela est bien faible, c’est dommage! Ce n’est pas ainsi que l’on y verra plus clair!
On détestera davantage les juifs, c’est sûr! Sinon, pas grand chose!
Et seule critique …celle de la décision de M6 de ne pas participer à la mascarade organisée par les princes du golfe!
From a lawyer, I think this is weak, it is a pity! This is no way to ensure that we will see more clearly!
We hate the Jews more, for sure! Otherwise, not much [has changed]!
And … the only criticism is of M6*'s decision not to participate in the charade organized by the princes of the Gulf!
*M6 is a common abbreviation for King Mohammed VI.
While the debate over the king's decision rages on, other bloggers are simply wondering what Arab governments can do to stop Israel's attacks on Gaza. Abdelilah Boukili is one such blogger.
For the man in the street, there should be military intervention through the borders with Egypt , Jordan and Lebanon to stop Israeli aggression. But this s unrealistic. The Arab countries don’t have an army like NATO with regular common training and a board of command to mount joint military operations. There are the political calculations which make many countries hesitant about this sort of venture.
The Arabs have shown solidarity with the Palestinians through protests, condemnations and the sending of humanitarian aids.
It remains up to the Palestinians to show unity among themselves before asking the rest of the Arab world to unite with them. Differences between them just reinforces division in attitude towards the way their cause should be supported.
Actual Digital [es], in a post entitled “No a la barbarie…The Slaughter Must Stop,” comments that, “Quien quiere hoy borrar Gaza del mapa, mañana será borrado del mapa de Oriente Medio” [“Whoever wants to wipe Gaza away from the map, tomorrow will be wiped from Middle East map”]. The blogger goes on to say:
El infierno de Gaza no para, cuantos muertos y heridos espera Israel ver para anunciar su victoria, ¿quiere Israel borrar Gaza por completo del mapa? Si eso es lo que está haciendo hoy mañana no sabemos lo que les guarda el futuro. Todavía tras la masacre de más de mil personas inocentes y 5 mil heridos una de ellos mujeres y niños quiere continuar sus crímenes, niega al pueblo palestino vivir libre como todo el mundo. Políticos y militares dicen de misma voz “No han conseguido todavía sus objetivos..Desde 60 años dicen lo mismo, y qué son sus objetivos, más palestinos muertos, más masacres, más tragedias y ninguna luz en el horizonte o esperanza de vivir en libertad. ¿Eso es lo quiere Occidente ver?. Donde está esa la Comunidad Internacional, en este momento de dolor palestino parece que solo mueven para proteger sus intereses… y los de sus aliados ¿Por qué no se aplican los mismos standards y las mismas leyes internacionales para todas las naciones y pueblos?
The blogger behind Mon Paradis Inanimé remarks upon the fact that the Moroccan public is divided over the conflict:
Au Maroc les avis sont partagés sur cette affaire. J’ai été très étonnée et surprise de voir que des musulmans très pratiquants ne supportaient pas le Hamas : “ce sont des gens qui se servent des civils et qui sont responsables de la mort d’autants d’innocents en Palestine!” disent-ils.
Les jeunes marocains sont aussi divisés et du jour au lendemain une grande majorité des jeunes est devenue religieuse comme par miracle! L’effet médiatique est à son comble. Malheureusement une grande partie des jeunes se laisse emporter par les médias et manque d’esprit critique. Hier encore je fus supprimée de la liste de contacts d’un ami parce que je l’ai décrit comme antisémite et ce parce que je lui ai dit qu’il y a une différence immense entre un juif et un sioniste. Le judaïsme existe depuis des millénaires alors que le sionisme est centenaire. Les sionistes sont des personnes athées qui se sont servies des religions pour leurs profits personnels. Les juifs pratiquants déclarent haut et fort que dans leur livre religieux, la terre palestinienne ne leur appartient pas. Mais ça c’est un autre débat dans lequel je ne souhaite pas entrer. Je ne suis pas religieuse.
Young Moroccans are also divided, and suddenly, a large majority of young people have become religious as if by miracle! The media effect is at its peak. Unfortunately, many of the young can easily be swayed by the media and their lack of critical thinking. Just yesterday I was removed from the list of a contacts of a friend because [I don't get this part] and because I told him there is a huge difference between a Jew and a Zionist. Judaism has been around for millenia while Zionism is centenary. The Zionists are atheists who have used religion for their personal profit. The Jews say that loud and clear, in their religious book, the Palestinian land does not belong to them. But that's another debate in which I do not wish to enter. I'm not religious
Morocco's Jewish community has also spoken up about the conflict, demonstrating yet another line of division in Moroccan public opinion. From The View from Fez:
The Secretary General of the Foundation for Moroccan Jewish Heritage, Simon Lévy, has denounced the Israeli aggression on Gaza, and called on the international community to intervene to solve the conflict.
“We are horrified by the carnage that can't be justified and which killed around 1,000 people in Gaza,” said Levy in a statement to Moroccan radio station “Rabat Chaîne Inter”.
“It is horrible and this is not the way I see Judaism,” Levy said, voicing hope to establish peace and see a halt of the massacre against the Palestinian people in Gaza.
Spanish translation by Gabriela Garcia Calderon Orbe
14 comments
I didn’t visited this blog long time ago, but as you seems collecting Moroccan point of views you can add me to the side of not supporting Gaza People, first Egypt should do more, because the always cry’s on the roofs that they are arabs, and the voice of arabs( morocco is not an Arab country, some people will not agree with me but the facts are there 80% of moroccans are berbers sousi, chluh, rifi, etc..) the King of morocco did well when he saw some arab leaders criticizing each other because the are playing the role of observers, and trying to ched some light in thier inexsistent politics in foreign issues, the king as the faith commander played his role, morocco was making a lots of efforts, to find solutions in secret, the other leader, are expecting to get some credit from US ( Egypt etc..) the prince of Qatar(whqt this guy knows about politics complexcity?) just (hi mom look at me I am on TV?)
so Abbas should be ashamed of the sitation lived in gaza he want to gouvern but democretically talking he was not elected there?
so first the palestinians should clean thier domestic derty cloths before involving the Muslim nations, in this( to make the diference between arabs and muslim)
Sorry to diverge from this important topic but I wanted to invite you, Jill, and your readers to participate in my new survey. Thanks for filling out the last one as I would have been unable to formulate this new avenue of inquiry without it.
I have revisted the topic of my research–my focus is now human rights (freedom of speech) and Moroccan culture. The new survey is available at the following link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/91515/blogoma-research.
It should not take you more than 15 minutes. I apologize that the formatting is sometimes bad. I will end the survey on February 16.
Thank you,
Reb
@Redouane
To assume that without the existence of Hamas the Israeli Government would have sought a peaceful resolution to the problem is not only naïve but a perversion of reality. Hamas came into power 2 years ago and Rabin was assassinated in 1995 by a Jewish fundamentalist only 2 years after the signing the Declaration of principals. Israel has all the levers of controls for this conflict. It is extremely simple they can just break the truce when things do not go their way in the negotiation table, like they did the 4th November 2008 and set a stringent crossing blockade, like they did for few years. The balance of power is so tilted in favour of Israel that whatever Palestinian authority in place that does not make drastic concessions and totally forget the borders set by the Green Line will be made to suffer the consequences of their decision. To compound the problem even more, the deafening silence of the UNSC and in particular the failure of its veto-wielding permanent members to compel Israel to stop its acts of aggression and policies of collective punishment against the civilian population of Gaza. I am not saying that the choice the Palestinian made by electing Hamas was a good one, or the existence of Hamas as a political movement will serve the best interest of the Palestinian people , in fact the opposite is true. However, the question that needs to be evoked, is peace feasible in an ethnocratic with universal suffrage and a dollop of theocracy regime? The Israeli political arena is heavily theocratic. Nearly the quarter of its elected members in the Knesset are from extreme religious parties that will not accept under any circumstance a Palestinian entity. Will any kind of coalition with Ultra-Orthodox parties hold? Would the Israelis vote for a two state solution if a referendum takes place (As promised by the Likud party)? Would the Orthodox Jewish religious fanatics leave the land they occupied illegally?
These are genuine questions that need to be debated if we are serious about a peaceful solution to the conflict. The rest is just political posturing and the rhetoric of war.
To say that the Moroccan endorsement for the Palestinian cause is a visceral support is really a nonsensical statement. Like the Jewish Diaspora worldwide with Israel, the Moroccan public has an organic relation with the Palestinian people, regardless of political parties or the temporary powers in charge at any historical juncture (including Hamas). However, I would like to elaborate on Redounane’s Hamas point. Redouane unfortunately displays all the symptoms of the new Moroccan immigrant arriviste, who endorsed Western positions even when they are blatantly iniquitous. Incapable to reason and blinded by hate for Islamist dogma they are unable to separate what is clearly a moral blight on the whole of the Islamic world, and the evil and barbaric acts we saw in Gaza. This hate is so intense that reason is beginning to elude his logic. Being against despotic regimes and Islamist Jihadist dogma is one thing, however supporting or justifying the Israeli crimes under any pretext is another matter altogether. There is an element of self-denial and an obstinate refusal to see the facts as they are, just for the sake of not taking the same stance vis-à-vis Israel as the official position of Arab government. This logic of “La loi du tout ou rien” is simply absurd and goes against the essence of free thinking. To deplore the Arab world’s and Islamism’ conformism and blindly accept the US “Foxnews” style dogma is just sad.