See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Japanese Power Utility Finally Admits Fukushima Meltdown

Earthquake and Tsunami damage-Dai Ichi Power Plant, Japan

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex in March 2011. Unit 1 reactor is on far right. Image from Wikipedia/Wikicommons.

Large Japanese electricity utility Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) confirmed on Thursday, March 19 that nearly all fuel in one of four damaged nuclear reactors at Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant has melted and fallen into the containment building

With the design of the Fukushima Daiichi plants, the containment building was a very simple shell protecting the reactor from the elements, but provided no real protection in the event of a nuclear accident. Instead, the nuclear reactor was enclosed in primary and secondary containment vessels, which sat atop a thick concrete pad at the base of the containment building.

In the event of a meltdown, the thick concrete pad is the only barrier between highly radioactive molten fuel and groundwater.

While there has been suspicions that nuclear fuel did melt its way through the containment vessel and to the base of the containment building, until Thursday there was no definitive proof meltdown had occurred. 

The implication of the findings is that it will be very difficult to remove the highly radioactive molten fuel from Unit 1. As well, the molten fuel must continue to be cooled with water until it is removed. 

Holes and fractures in the concrete base of the reactor building also means that groundwater continues to seep in and become irradiated before draining into the Pacific Ocean, causing an ongoing nuclear disaster.

Tepco's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power facility was severely damaged following the massive earthquake and subsequent tsunami that occurred on March 11, 2011. 

Location of six reactors at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex. Image courtesy Wikipedia.

Following the earthquake and tsunami, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex lost power and the ability to cool fuel in the reactors. The lack of cooling caused a series of hydrogen explosions that severely damaged four of the six reactors at the Daiichi complex.

The resulting release of radioactivity and fears of even an even bigger disaster prompted the evacuation of towns located within a 30-km radius of the plant.

Meanwhile, the lack of power meant water could not be pumped in to cool the nuclear fuel in the reactors. The fuel rods in the reactor vessel started to melt, eventually pooling on the bottom of the reactor vessel.

Eventually the molten fuel melted through the primary and secondary containment vessels, and pooled on the concrete pad at the base of the reactor.

Ever since March 11, 2011, there have been questions about the state of the nuclear fuel in the containment vessels of the four damaged reactor buildings. The interiors of the reactor buildings remain highly radioactive and lethal for human beings to enter. 

The amount of debris and destruction within the reactor buildings plus flooding has made entry by robots and remotely-operated vehicles challenging.

How meltdown occurred according to experts. [Image shows presumed current location of molten fuel in the basement of Unit 1 containment building, separated from water table by the concrete bad supporting the reactor building.]

The location of the molten fuel was achieved using a technique called muon scattering tomography. Muons are elementary particles associated with cosmic radiation reaching the Earth from outer space. 

While muons penetrate most matter, the particles change direction when encountering certain elements, in this case the uranium in nuclear fuel. Researchers used this characteristic to check for the presence of fuel in the Unit 1 reactor.

However, the behavior of the muon particles indicated that no fuel remains in the reactor itself.

NHK image: A study was conducted in February 2012 searching for the melted remains of nuclear fuel in Unit 1.

>>The study showed that no fuel remains could be found in the reactor (indicating the fuel had melted through the bottom of the reactor into the basement of the reactor).<<

[Captions, from top left: Muon scattering tomography used to analyze interior of Unit 1 reactor; No fuel can be detected within interior of the reactor; (Simulation) Very little nuclear fuel remains in reactor or containment vessel; Nuclear reactor and containment vessel; white areas indicate absence of any fuel.]

As has been predicted, most of the molten fuel has settled on the concrete pad that supporting the containment vessels in the base of the containment building.

Almost none of the molten fuel in the Unit 1 remains in the reactor. [Image caption: Molten fuel melts through the pressure vessel onto the floor of the containment building.]

  • Fanandala

    Until now nobody was sure as to where the core actually was. I do not think that TEPCO ever denied that a meltdown happened. The question was just about the extent. Now they still have to establish the amount of damage in the other 2 reactors.

  • From the way they’ve denied, then minimized, then finally admitted when confronted with proof…I’d say we’re still in the “minimized” stage on this. It’s not inconceivable that the core – if still molten – burned through the concrete pad, too…

  • yellowroz

    All the articles I have read so far weasel around whether they have found fuel in the containment vessel, or whether it has burned through it as well.

    Sorry for the reposts, but I want everyone to understand the original geology of Fukushima, as analyzed in the planning for its construction. Scroll down for the colored sectional of the geology, and water level of the harbor.

    http://www.fukushima-blog.com/article-the-geology-of-fukushima-88575278.html

  • cetude

    It’s still leaking huge amounts of radioactivity into the oceans.

  • Mr. Obama
    I found these flowers in west area of Japan.
    I know that America said Japan to restart nuclear power plants.
    May be they were from polluted area. And more, fertilizers are polluted.
    You should fire Richard Armitage and Joseph Nye, or we will be polluted again.
    We want to live long!

Our work building bridges across cultures, languages and perspectives is more urgent than ever before.

Learn more about Global Voices »

Donate now

Close