Russia: Bloggers Discuss Andrzej Wajda’s “Katyń” Movie · Global Voices
Alexey Sidorenko

For the first time in Russian history, Andrzej Wajda‘s [ENG] “Katyń” (2007) has been aired on Russian public television channel “Kultura” [ENG] provoking online discussions on Stalin regime, historical truth, humanism and Russian-Poland relations.
Katyń movie poster, Wikimedia Commons
The Katyn massacre [ENG], a deliberate execution of almost 22,000 Polish officers by the Russian NKVD officers [ENG] in 1940 remains the main unresolved historical issue between contemporary Russia and Poland. Throughout almost 50 years official Soviet propaganda said that Katyn had been a Nazi war crime until in 1990 Mikhail Gorbachev recognized the NKVD murders.
Russian government's position on the issue was far from straightforward since that. In 1990, the Russian Prosecutor's Office started investigation of the horrible incident. In 1992, Russian president Boris Yeltsin shared a part of the secret archives containing evidence of the NKVD executions. But in 2004 (already under Putin), the case was closed due to the death of the guilty (executors). Polish officers shot in Katyn along with thousands of Soviet political prisoners were neither rehabilitated nor recognized as repressed. While in Poland Katyn massacre became one of the new nation-building symbols of martyrdom, there's no common view on the issue in the Russian society as there's a group of historians promoting Soviet point of view [ENG]backed up by communist party together with some veterans of NKVD. The Soviet version is still transmitted in popular newspaper like “Pravda,”[RUS] and by some popular bloggers like Russian intellectual Anatoliy Wasserman.
Followed by a serious worsening of relations between the two countries in 2005-2007 (Meat trade dispute [ENG], Missile dispute, etc.), things started to change in 2007. The prime-ministers of Poland and Russia launched the Commission on Difficult Issues [RUS], which mission was to settle down a large number of historical issues between the countries. The Katyn massacre stood as a central point of the debate. Most experts agree [RUS] that the appearance of “Katyń” on Russian public TV was due to the work of the commission and upcoming commemoration of the Katyń massacre.
“Katyń” was aired during Friday prime-time (19:40 – 21:30) with the discussion after the show. It was claimed that the Channel One (Russian leading TV channel) simultaneously Oscar-winning “Hurt Locker” on purpose but that turned out to be inaccurate (“Katyn” ended at 21:30, while “Hurt Locker” began at this very time). Interesting feature of the TV-discussion that followed the movie was that none of the Polish representatives was invited.
The online discussion of the movie gathered more than 2100 blog posts [RUS] and became #5 topic in the Yandex discussion rating. Bloggers were divided in their opinions. Some completely denied the version of NKVD murders (claimed to be the Goebbels’ version as the Nazis were the first to announce Katyn massacres). Among those who recognized the NKVD murders, opinions weren't uniform either. Despite some bloggers’ claims “Katyń” was “market-oriented,” “Anti-soviet on purpose,” “too outlined,” “made to order,” the majority of Runetizens said they were deeply touched by the movie.
Most bloggers denounced the myth of the movie's hidden russophobia (anti-russian sentiment).
kir_mgd, for example, wrote:
Я, честно говоря, не воспринял фильм как русофобский хоть в какой-то мере.Что-то там действительно трафаретно и прямолинейно(флаг на портянки),но не примитивно и злопамятно. Впечатление очень сильное производит.
Moderator of the ru_katyn community dassie2001 wrote:
Никто другой в Польше не сделал бы НЕантироссийского (НЕрусофобского) фильма на тему Катыни. Вайде – удалось
One of the main current of those discussions was the search for the reason of the mass murders. “Usual” (in this kind of discussions) versions like “strategic necessity,” “revenge for 16,000-20,000 Soviet prisoners of war who died in the Polish camps after Soviet-Polish war“[ENG] and others were offered. LJ user Yasko repeated deputy Kosachev's explanation [ENG] of the massacre in terms of the essential blood-lust of the faceless totalitarian regime:
Совершенно гениально пан Вайда показал нам, что это работала именно машина уничтожения людей. А то, что эта машина – порождение именно западной мысли, западной цивилизации, это тема выходящая уже за пределы темы Катыни, в том ей масштабе, в котором надо было её сегодня раскрыть, что А. Вайда и сделал.
Not everyone accepted the notion of faceless machine. LJ user Maxilla_k wrote:
Однако, хватит врать, автор у этой “машины” безусловно есть, и он в фильме показан. “Эффективный менеджер” смотрит со стены в сцене приговора “тройки” генералу польских войск. Зачем он то делал, – не знаю.
The humanism topic was raised by popular movie critic kinanet:
Подлинная опасность ленты Вайды, которой испугались в нынешней России многие перестраховщики, заключается как раз в человеческом измерении политической трагедии, не заканчивающейся выяснением всех обстоятельств случившегося в Катыньском лесу.
…
Мы ж привыкли поклоняться лживым кумирам, фальшивым идеалам, а главное – любить не отеческие гробы, а могилы вождей и их прихлебателей на Красной площади. И потому пребываем в тоске по прежнему величию, которое тоже было дутым, поскольку имело своей основой кровь и насилие. Так люди ли мы, человеки ли?
It seems that the movie had an effect. After viewing it, Yelena Tokareva, editor-in-chief of the tabloid “Stringer,” publicly said she was [RUS] sorry for the negative reviews that were published in her magazine.
The effect was especially significant for those Russians who were not aware of the issue. If not in a historical but at least in a moral way. As eli_prophet put it:
Я был приятно обрадован тем, что хоть и спустя 3 года после выхода, хоть бы и не по самому центральному каналу, но этот фильм был показан на государственном телеканале в пятницу (и не простую, а страстную пятницу), в самый прайм-тайм. Это не огромный шаг, но шаг достойный уважения. И мне кажется важным, чтобы как можно больше людей в нашей стране получили возможность посмотреть на события Второй мировой войны другими глазами, с другого ракурса.