Activists speculate on Elon Musk's foreign influence after proposing Ukraine and Taiwan peace deals

Elon Musk via Wikimedia Commons. Licenced under (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has been under fire after stepping out of the business realm and sharing controversial views on Twitter and in a media interview about peace deals on the current Ukraine-Russia and Taiwan-China crisis. Speculation has been boiling on Twitter about Musk’s possible ties with Beijing and the Kremlin.

Speculations and conspiracy theories exploded on October 12, with many calling for a full investigation on Musk’s possible foreign influence, after Ian Bremmer, an expert on Eurasian geopolitics, claimed that the powerful entrepreneur spoke with Putin and the Kremlin about Russia's “red lines” on Ukraine before he put forward his peace plan.

American activist group, Occupy Democrats, joined the call for a full investigation into Musk:

Elon Musk’s tie with Russia

Musk denounced Bremmer’s claim saying that he only spoke with Putin 18 months ago about his space project:

Ian Bremmer stood by his story. In his weekly newsletter, Bremmer said Musk told him that he had direct conversations with Russian President Putin and the Kremlin concerning Russia’s redlines before he tweeted about the Ukraine-Russia peace proposal. Ian Bremmer also stated that Musk, the founder and CEO of SpaceX, refused to enable Starlink connection in Crimea in order to prevent escalation in the current war.

Elon Musk was widely praised on Twitter last February after SpaceX, a spacecraft engineering company, enabled Starlink service in Ukraine as Russia invaded the country. It was later revealed that the US had paid millions to ensure Internet communication in Ukraine would not be disrupted by the war.

Bremmer’s revelation on Starlink seemed to have confirmed political activist Bill Browder’s observation on the exchange between Elon Musk and Russia's influence over recent outrages of Starlink in Ukraine’s frontline battlefields:

Talks on peacebuilding in Ukraine and Taiwan

Since early October, Elon Musk has been venturing into international diplomatic waters, first, by proposing a “Ukraine-Russia Peace” deal on Twitter. The tweet invited a flood of criticisms as Musk ignored Russia’s war crimes and echoed Putin's annexation referendum narratives and sovereignty claim over Crimea. Lucian Kim, Moscow correspondent of NPR, an American non-profit media organization, noted:

Then in an interview with the Financial Times published on October 8, the Tesla CEO suggested China “figure out a special administrative zone for Taiwan” in the form of “an arrangement that’s more lenient than Hong Kong.”

The Republic of China (ROC) was established in 1912, and its ruling party Kuomintang escaped to Taiwan after the defeat of the China Civil War in 1949. ROC was a member of the United Nations until 1971 when a resolution was passed to replace China’s representation from ROC to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under the Communist Party of China (CPC). Despite the shift in its diplomatic status, the ROC/Taiwan remains a political, military, and economic independent entity.

Musk’s proposal, however, suggests giving up the ROC/Taiwan’s sovereignty to China in exchange for a so-called peaceful resolution of the current cross-strait crisis triggered by Beijing’s military drills in response to the US House Representative Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan. As expected, China state-sponsored commentator Hu Xijin immediately praised Musk on Twitter, followed by appreciation from Qin Gang, Chinese Ambassador to the US:

While Taiwan’s premier Su Tseng-chang dismissed Musk’s comment by saying that he “doesn't know much” about the region, others saw his comment as a strategic business choice.

Ukraine-born racecar driver, Igor Sushko, saw Musk's “peace proposals” on Ukraine and Taiwan as an immoral business choice:

According to Electrek, a website on electric transportation, Tesla’s monthly output in its Chinese factories will be up to 100,000 by the end of 2022.

Tesla’s expanding market in China

Charles Mok, an expert on digital policy, also believes that Elon Musk is under China’s political influence:

In the FT interview, Musk was also quoted as saying that “Beijing has made clear its disapproval of his recent rollout of Starlink in Ukraine to help the military circumvent Russia’s cut-off of the Internet,” and that “Beijing sought assurances that he would not sell Starlink in China…What this comment must mean is Musk committed not to sell Starlink in Taiwan, which Beijing considers to be a sovereign part of China.”

Charles Mok’s worries about Musk’s possible Faustian bargain with China are not groundless. Elon Musk had an in-depth dialogue and took a ride on Tesla's new car model with the Chinese ambassador in California in March.

Tesla's stake in China has complicated Elon Musk’s Twitter-acquisition plan. In fact, tech activists and groups have urged the US Congress to investigate Musk's foreign ties after he proposed to carry on with the acquisition of Twitter with an ambitious plan to turn the social media tool into China’s WeChat-like all-powerful “everything app.” Some activists in the digital rights sector say they cannot trust Musk, including Michael Caster:

After Ian Bremmer’s revelation of Musk's conversation with Putin, a full investigation of the entrepreneur’s foreign ties seems inevitable.

Start the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.