- Global Voices - https://globalvoices.org -

Taiwan Policy Act 2022: The US becomes less ambiguous about defending Taiwan

Categories: East Asia, North America, China, Taiwan (ROC), U.S.A., International Relations, War & Conflict, Highlighting Taiwan’s international invisibility

A screenshot from CBS's 60 Minutes [1] interview on Twitter.

In a large step away from the United States’ tradition of strategic ambiguity [2] regarding Taiwan, US President Joe Biden stated [1] in a television interview on Monday, September 19, that the US forces would defend Taiwan if China invaded the self-governed state.

The President’s comment came after the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed the Taiwan Policy Act [3] 2022, which provides Taiwan with USD 6.5 billion in security aid to purchase military equipment. The Act also includes a sanction package targeting key mainland Chinese officials and the banking system in response to Beijing’s invasion.

It also ensures that Taiwan would enjoy the status of a “major non-NATO Ally,” a strategic partnership on military and technology exchange and assistance.

China protested the new Act. The Chinese ambassador to the US, Qin Gang, said [8] if the Act is passed in the US Congress, the foundation of US-China relations will collapse.

Once passed, the Taiwan Policy Act 2022 would replace the Taiwan Relations Act 1979 [9], which was enacted to maintain Taiwan’s self-governing status quo by enhancing its self-defense military capacity as Washington switched diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China (ROC/Taiwan) to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

The US government terminated its Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan in 1980, one year after it established diplomatic ties with the PRC.

Officially, the US recognizes PRC as the sole representative of one China. Yet, it also upholds the principle of peaceful resolution of cross-strait relations.  Hence, for decades, the US government has been ambiguous about whether it would defend Taiwan against China's invasion.

Biden’s latest comment on the popular US television program, 60 Minutes, during an interview with correspondent Scott Pelley showed that the US has become decidedly less ambiguous in its commitment to Taiwan:

Here is a transcript of Biden's comments concerning Taiwan:

Pelley: What should Chinese President Xi [Jinping] know about your commitment to Taiwan?

Biden: We agree with what we signed onto a long time ago. There is one China Policy and Taiwan makes their own judgements about their independence. We are not moving, we are not encouraging their being independent. That’s their decision.

Pelley: But would U.S. forces defend the island?

Biden: Yes, if in fact there was an unprecedented attack.

Pelley: So unlike Ukraine, to be clear, sir. US forces, US men and women would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion?

Biden: Yes.

Although the White House clarified after that interview that the US policy towards Taiwan has not changed, the bipartisan Senate’s vote for the Taiwan Policy Act indicated that there is indeed a top-level consensus within the government that the US needs to forge a stronger ally with Taiwan. Lindsey Graham, a conservative US senator who recently visited Taiwan and voted for the new act in the Senate, stressed:

Taiwan welcomed the legislation as China’s economic sanctions and military drills in recent years, in particular after US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan [14], have threatened the security of the Taiwanese people and upset peace in the Pacific region:

China deployed an unprecedented number of aircraft and naval vessels surrounding Taiwan during its week-long military drills [18] in early August. It also fired missiles across the main island, which fell into Japan and the Philippines’ exclusive economic zones. Foreign policy analysts see the Taiwan Policy Act as a move to deter China’s aggression. Isaac Stone Fish, an Asia expert, shared such a view:

On the other hand, pro-China views, like Victor Gao, a Chinese Communist Party-affiliated academia described [21] the Act as a “declaration of war”:

History will also record if the TPA, if adopted and enacted, will constitute a declaration of war by the US against China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and trigger a whole series of events which may completely and profoundly reshape the world…

In Taiwan, some commentators are also worried that the US legislation would provoke Beijing into taking more aggressive moves. But pro-Taiwan independent views, such as Chen Po-Wei, a former Taiwanese lawmaker, rebuked [22] the idea:

再次提醒,加強自己家園的安全性,不該被視為挑釁。台美雙方均沒有入侵中國、「反攻大陸」等意願。戰爭發動方,永遠都是中國,挑釁或敵意,也永遠只有中國。 把台灣抵抗侵略者說成台灣在挑釁,這種居心十分險惡,這是要阻止台灣強大的手段。 當你看起來足夠強悍,侵略你的成本越高,敵人就不敢輕易動手。

Please be reminded: strengthening our security should not be viewed as a provocation. Both Taiwan and the US have done nothing to invade China and have no such intention. China is the war initiator who picks fights and instigates hostility. Taiwan is the defender, and those who accused Taiwan of being the instigator have ill intentions. They want to stop Taiwan from gaining strength. The cost of invasion would be lifted when we are strong. This would deter the enemy from making the aggressive move.

Unlike the outpouring of pro-Chinese nationalistic material [23] that emerged during Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan trip, as the US senate passed the draft of the Taiwan bill, Chinese online influencers repressed their nationalistic sentiments and refrained from making pro-war comments on Weibo. They merely described the bill's content and recited the official Chinese stand. Some complained that related discussions were repressed as key terms like #TaiwanPolicyAct did not appear in the search trending list.

Following the US Senate’s vote on Taiwan, the European Union Parliament also passed [24] a resolution condemning China’s military aggression against Taiwan. The resolution stated that China’s provocative actions must have consequences on relations with the EU.