Taiwan, ‘the most dangerous place on Earth'? Not according to Taiwanese.

Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen's response to the Economist. Image from Tsai's Twitter.

British magazine The Economist's cover story on Taiwan this week elicited strong reactions on Taiwanese Twitter, with many users showing astonishment at the headline, “Taiwan: The most dangerous place on Earth.”

The Economist's story focuses on the tensions between the United States and China and depicts the self-ruling island as an arena where these hostilities play out.

Many users criticized this choice of framing:

Others sarcastically mocked it:

Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen also tweeted a reaction on April 30, saying that Taiwan was “at the front lines of democracy worldwide”:

Taiwan stands on the front lines of democracy worldwide. As long as the people of Taiwan remain united and uphold our core values while responding prudently to regional developments, we can overcome the challenges posed by authoritarian expansion. I trust that our like-minded partners, having seen the risks involved, will rise to this challenge and work together to maintain peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific.

While the story's headline is exaggerated, the military threat is indeed real. China has claimed sovereignty over Taiwan since 1949, when the Kuomingtang lost the Chinese civil war and fled to the island. Since Tsai Ing-wen, of the pro-independence Democratic Progress Party, was elected present in 2016, China has doubled down on the nationalist rhetoric, with the slogan “unifying Taiwan by force” becoming ever more popular — and military drills across the strait ever more frequent.

The U.S. has long adopted a policy of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan, in which it provides political and military support to the island without openly promising it would defend it in the case of an attack by China. But in President Joe Biden's administration, American officials have been increasingly calling for an explicit pledge of Taiwan's defense.

On April 14, ahead of a visit by U.S. emissaries to Taiwan, Beijing sent 24 military aircraft, including fighters and nuclear-capable bombers, into Taiwan’s air defense zone. Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council stressed that the military action was to show Beijing’s determination to stop Taiwan’s independence.

Two days later, in an exclusive interview with the Associated Press, China’s Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs Le Yucheng warned the U.S. against playing the “Taiwan card.” He also implied that China is open to resorting military force:

China firmly opposes any form of official engagement between the United States and Taiwan. Whether low-level or high-level, official engagement is what we firmly oppose. The United States should not play the “Taiwan card”. It is dangerous. The one-China principle is China's red line. […] We are prepared to do everything we can for peaceful reunification. That said, we don't pledge to give up other options. No option is excluded.

Although the threat from China is real, some found that The Economist’s story framing echoed China’s fear-mongering tactics, while also undermining Taiwan's position:

Others urged Taiwan to develop a diplomatic framework that is able to stand up to China’s threats without relying on the United States alone.

Taiwanese citizens have widely praised its officials for their handling of the COVID-19 outbreak — there have been only been 12 deaths on the island by the disease since the start of the pandemic. Taiwan has seen a GDP growth of more than 8 percent in the first season of 2021 despite China’s economic sanctions and military drills. A large number of Hong Kong protesters have also taken refuge in Taiwan in face of Beijing’s political persecution following the 2019 anti-China extradition protests.

@letsupupup thus describe this paradoxical status with a common Chinese expression:

The most dangerous place on earth is the safest place.
#Taiwan’s status is the key to world peace
#Enclose China


  • While adhering to One China policy as the foundation of US-China relationship, it is fundamentally inconsistent to coming to Taiwan’s aid in helping the latter assert for independence. You can never win over China’s goodwill as long as you are being instrumental keeping a part of it severed from it. Its corollary would be something like China helping Hawai to secede from the US. Therefore, in the interest of international peace and amity, America should instead play a catalytic role for integrating Taiwan with the rest of China peacefully even as its democratic order is kept intact. It would mean helping negotiate a version of an agreement that is better than the one signed between the Great Britain and China for the handover of Hong Kong.

  • McaV

    Hawaii likes being part of America and Taiwan likes being a free, independent nation, whereas China’s “goodwill” destroyed the democratic government in Hong Kong; therefore, the corollary is the destruction of democracy in Taiwan by China using the same fundamental tactics. Centuries of insecure, suspicious emperors in China continue primitive attacks on fellow Chinese people and Uyghurs. Remove the cameras and set Winnie the Pooh free all over China, Hong Kong and Xinjiang.

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.