- Global Voices - https://globalvoices.org -

Journalist's abduction raises concerns about media freedom in Pakistan

Categories: South Asia, Pakistan, Censorship, Citizen Media, Digital Activism, Freedom of Speech, Governance, Human Rights, Law, Media & Journalism, Politics, Protest, Advox
Matiullah Jan, a renowned journalist and critic of the Pakistan Military. Screenshot from YouTube video by Naya Daur TV. [1]

Matiullah Jan, a renowned journalist and critic of the Pakistan Military. Screenshot from YouTube video by Naya Daur TV.

On the morning of July 21, Matiullah Jan, a renowned journalist and critic of the Pakistan military, was abducted in Islamabad [2] by unidentified persons. He was released about 12 hours later in the city of Fateh Jang, about 46 km away from Islamabad.

The journalist's family have accused state security agencies of being responsible for the kidnapping.

About a week before Jan's abduction, on July 15, the Supreme Court of Pakistan initiated legal proceedings against him [3] for contempt of court over a “derogatory” tweet against the same court and its judges [4]. In the July 13 tweet [4], Jan criticised seven of the country's ten Supreme Court judges after they dismissed the presidential petition [5] accusing their colleague, Supreme Court judge Justice Qazi Faez Isa, of misconduct and living beyond his means.

The day after he had been kidnapped, July 22, Jan was scheduled to go to court to answer the contempt charges arising from his tweet.

What Jan's abduction says about press freedom

Matiullah Jan had just dropped his wife [6] to the school where she teaches when his car was intercepted. The incident, which was captured [7] by the school's CCTV system, shows that there was a brief tussle, during which Jan threw his cellphone into the school's premises. His kidnappers were able to retrieve the phone, however, after which he was taken to an undisclosed location.

Once news of the kidnapping broke, Jan's brother and friends went to the school, retrieved the CCTV footage and released the video [8] on social media. In short order, hashtags like #BringBackMatiullah [9], which called for the journalist's safe return, were trending on Twitter.

There were also pleas to end state interference in freedom of the press. Journalist Amir Mateen denounced pressure from the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media arm of the Pakistan Armed Forces and other agencies.

Twitter user Naila Inayat reminded her followers about the disturbing frequency of other forced disappearances:

Tweeting from his father's Twitter account, Jan's son demanded that the government bring him back, and that state agencies be held accountable for his disappearance:

Speaking to the media [16], Jan's wife Kaneez Sughra said that when she called him around 1 p.m., one of his cellphones was switched off and he wasn’t answering the other one. “Everyone knows who picked him up,” she said, referring to state security agencies. She added, “It is no secret about those who have been after him for years.”

In 2017, Jan was attacked [17] in Islamabad, but escaped unhurt. He and his children had been travelling to Bhara Kahu, 18 km away from Islamabad, when two motorcyclists coming from the opposite direction smashed the windscreen of his car by throwing a rock at it.

‘Twitter condemnations’

Jan's abduction has caused a stir in Pakistan, with the Islamabad High Court calling for an inquiry [18] into his disappearance.

During a National Assembly [19] session on July 21, opposition parties and journalists covering the proceedings staged a walkout as a sign of protest, and announced [20] that they would continue to boycott all sessions of the lower house until the government discloses where Jan had been taken and identifies those responsible for it.

The boycott has now ended, although those questions remain unanswered.

Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari said on social media [21] that she found Jan's kidnapping “very disturbing”, but was bashed by her followers [22], who saw it as her duty to ensure that Jan was rescued, not just tweet about it.

Meanwhile, the chairperson of the Senate Committee on Human Rights, Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar, tweeted that the Inspector General of Police would have to brief the committee on the incident:

However, Senator Sherry Rehman, a member of the opposition Pakistan People's Party [25] (PPP), suggested [26] that this “nonsense” of Twitter condemnations by ministers needs to stop: “Don’t take appeals on Twitter to condemn it; you have to either act or resign.”

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, along with rights activists and journalism organisations, condemned the abduction and expressed concern over increasing attempts to control the media:

Jan's kidnapping also prompted a small protest by journalists in Islamabad:

Jan's return and hearing

Attorney Shahid Abbasi, Jan's brother who is also acting as his legal counsel, said that he received a call from an unknown number informing him to pick up Jan from Fateh Jang. Jan later tweeted his gratitude for everyone who raised their voices in support of him:

In his court hearing, which went ahead as scheduled on July 22, Jan directly linked [36] his abduction with his contempt of court charges, saying [26], “On one side, people are not allowed to speak and on the other hand, those who dare to speak are being served contempt of court notices.”

At his court appearance, Jan was given two weeks to prepare his defence.

While the Supreme Court directed the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) police to submit a report on Jan's abduction and subsequent release, it also asked [37],”What are the state institutions doing? No agency or institution has the right to take matters into its own hands.”

In its 2020 World Press Freedom Index [38], Reporters Without Borders (RSF) ranked Pakistan 145th out of 180 countries, quite an indictment on the state of press freedom in Pakistan.

Jan's kidnapping is not the first time that a journalist has been manhandled or abducted; in fact, Prime Minister Imran Khan's government has been accused [39] of attempting to silence dissent [40]. Several media houses have experienced a financial squeeze [41], which has resulted in several publications going out of print and a large number of media professionals losing their jobs [42].