- Global Voices - https://globalvoices.org -

‘Export restrictions’ prevent US ventilators from reaching Barbados — but citizens question tactics

· Written by Janine Mendes-Franco

Categories: Caribbean, Barbados, Citizen Media, Health, International Relations, Politics, COVID-19
[1]

COVID-19 masks; image by Prachatai [1] on Flickr; CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 [2].

Check out Global Voices’ special coverage [3] of the global impact of COVID-19.

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries face a growing need to access critical medical supplies like test kits, personal protective equipment and ventilators — much of which has to be imported.

The rush to secure resources has prompted moves by powerful governments like the United States, whose recent restrictions regarding such equipment has sparked controversy.

In a press conference on April 5, Barbados’ minister of health and wellness, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Bostic, said [4] (at 33 minutes in the timeline) that 20 ventilators bound for Barbados had been “seized in the United States.”

He did not provide further details.

There was initially some confusion over whether the ventilators in question were the same machines that had been donated [5] by Barbadian-born pop star Rihanna [6], but it was later confirmed [7] that these were a different batch [8].

Despite the setback, Minister Bostic maintained that Barbados had enough ventilators [9] to meet the island's current demand (not counting the more than 150 secured from various other sources) — and that the government had an “open cheque” for the purchase of critical supplies.

The island currently has [7] about 48 available ventilators; as of April 5, only three of the country’s 56 COVID-19 patients needed to use them.

Despite this, the move to bar the export of the ventilators did not go down well [10] with Caribbean netizens [11]:

The US Defense Production Act

While there have been acts of philanthropy during the COVID-19 pandemic (China, for instance, donated [16] thousands of test kits to Trinidad and Tobago), such humanitarian gestures are counterbalanced by what some are interpreting as acts of selfishness [17].

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, for instance, threatened retaliation [18] after the Trump administration, on April 2, 2020, reportedly instructed healthcare equipment manufacturer 3M to stop its export of protective masks to Canada and Latin America.

The US government was able to do this [19] by triggering [20] the Defense Production Act [21], which — in addition to allowing the Department of Homeland Security [22] and the Federal Emergency Management Agency [23] to secure any medical supplies it deems necessary — can also force private-sector manufacturers to give the government precedence when fulfilling orders.

3M, however, pushed back [24], saying that clamping down on exports achieves the “opposite” effect and has far-reaching humanitarian consequences.

Several other countries [25] have also voiced concerns about the United States’ approach to dealing with COVID-19 supplies.

Even US hospitals have been reporting [26] that federal agents have been “seizing orders,” and medical staff has complained about the lack of transparency surrounding the process.

The US government, however, says it is employing a data-based approach to determine where supplies should go.

Was ‘seized’ the right word?

Shortly after the Barbados health minister spoke at his press conference he went on record [27] to suggest that “‘seize’ might not have been the correct word”. He explained, “It has to do with export restrictions being placed on certain items.”

For clarification on what these restrictions entail, Global Voices reached out to the Barbados Government Information Service, which referred our questions to a representative of the minister; at the time of publication, there has been no reply.

The Barbados government has not announced how it plans to respond, but discussions are reportedly [27] ongoing between Barbados’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the United States Embassy.

On April 9, however, Barbados Today reported [28] that the public affairs officer at the US Embassy, Larry Socha, said his office hadn't “received any updates from the Government of Barbados regarding the alleged incident.”

The embassy says it is awaiting those details in order to continue to work with the country in defeating COVID-19.

An opportunity for Caribbean innovation?

The incident didn't stop people from labelling [29] US tactics as modern-day piracy [25]:

US Embassy spokesperson Socha also weighed in [28] on this “unfortunate” aspect of the narrative, suggesting that it “is being propagated by certain individuals and organisations to divide the international community”:

There is nothing more important right now than the international community coming together and those individuals and organisations that are promoting a narrative of division are doing the citizens of their own countries and other countries a disservice.

Facebook user David Coulthrust, however, saw an opportunity [36] for the Caribbean region:

Can a very brilliant engineer in Barbados make ventilators? I suggest we act now. Can the UWI [The University of the West Indies] accept this challenge?

Such a move wouldn't be without precedent, as one Twitter user was careful to remind people:

One Jamaican scientist, for example, is reportedly [41] awaiting patent approval for a cannabis-based drug to help treat COVID-19 symptoms.

In desperate times, however, many regional governments are surely hoping [42] that the lesson of COVID-19 will not be one in which “might is right:”