Recent events in Eastern Europe show a rise in antisemitism rhetoric, including in European Union (EU) members like Bulgaria and other EU candidate countries.
In November, monuments to the Soviet army in the cities of Plovdiv and Sofia, Bulgaria, a country that was a close ally of the USSR during its existence, were vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti. Russia's foreign ministry spokesperson, instead of condemning the graphic show of anti-Semitism, used the fact to try to revise the history of the rescue of the Bulgarian Jews during World War II.
Bulgaria joined World War II on the side of Nazi Germany, and as such perpetrated the Holocaust of Jews from Macedonia and Northern Greece in 1943. However the pro-fascist authorities faced difficulties in exterminating the rest of the Jewish population, who were mostly saved through efforts by domestic pro-democratic forces and the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. On September 9, 1944, after the Red Army occupied the country, Bulgaria changed its government and switched its support to the Allies.
The attempt to exploit the anti-Semitic graffiti for propaganda purposes, and present the USSR as savior of Bulgarian Jews, resulted in pushback from the Bulgarian foreign ministry spokesperson, the American Jewish Committee, as well as different media outlets and influential bloggers.
A worrisome aspect resulting from the debate, however, was that because the graffiti appeared on Soviet monuments, right-wing political parties in Bulgaria largely gave the anti-Semitism a “free pass”, under the guise that opposing communism is more important.
A string of recent incidents
This isn't the first instance fo anti-Semitic graffiti in Bulgaria. In 2016, visiting UK-based musician and writer Rachel Susser noted:
I started counting the swastikas sometime in December. Most days I would see at least one, but usually there were more. There were two between my apartment and my favorite bakery, and four on the way to my dance class. More than five visible through the bus window on the ride between Sofia and Plovdiv. Eleven in the first two hours of the drive north through the mountain pass toward Veliko Tarnovo. There are other neo-Nazi, white supremacist, and ultra-nationalist symbols, too.
Adela Peeva directed a 2017 documentary titled “Long Live Bulgaria” about rising nationalism in smaller cities in the country. In an interview with Bulgarian public television, she explained that what she saw were strong nationalistic views among those populations, combined with anti-Semitism and hate of the Roma population. A prime example can be seen in the opening scenes of the film, including the trailer below, in which a schoolboy states, “The national holiday is not for the foreigners or for the Gypsies.”
In October 2017, Bulgarian literature critic Dimitar Kambourov was accused by a number of prominent figures, and at least one Jewish organization, of using anti-Semitic speech in his review of the documentary “Angel Wagenstein – Art Is A Weapon”, about the life of screenwriter Angel Wagenstein, including his time in a Jewish brigade during wartime Bulgaria. After the uproar, Kambourov's review was taken down from the portal “Kultura” (culture), with an apology by the editor-in-chief. Another news outlet, Liberal Review, published a story, in which the author said that Kambourov has written in the past other racist texts.
Like the November graffiti, where anti-communism was used as an excuse for anti-Semitism, the heated discussion around the movie review was also focused on the fact that it was presented through an anti-communist point of view.
In 1943, the deportation of 48,000 Jews from Bulgaria was stopped, but only after 11,343 people were already sent away from the occupied territories in Northern Greece and Macedonia. In February 2018, Bulgarian far-right extremists continued to honor the memory of one of the proponents of the Holocaust (assassinated by anti-Nazi fighters in 1943), by holding a parade in the center of Sofia, the capital, in his honor.
A wider regional trend
Veni Markovski, an anti-fascist digital activist in Bulgaria, told Global Voices:
The result of all of the above, is a clear sign that more educational work is needed, and one could hope that Bulgaria would take the lead and confront anti-Semitism.
He's not alone in warning about the need to do something about anti-Semitism. Civil society activists from Central and Eastern Europe have been sounding the alarm about increasingly emboldened hate speech against Jewish people and apology for perpetrators of the Holocaust, as well as about the dangers of allowing it to pass with impunity.
For example, at a November 13, 2017 march of far-right nationalists in Warsaw, marking the anniversary of Poland's independence, chants calling for the country to be free of Jews were heard, according to the Times of Israel.
In Macedonia, a candidate for the EU, social media users took the occasion of Holocaust Memorial Day, January 28, to revisit a short-lived scandal in 2011 involving the country's current president, Gjorge Ivanov, who was elected in 2009 and 2014 with support by right-wing populist party VMRO-DPMNE.
In 2011 a newspaper called Shpic revealed that Ivanov, who previously worked as a political science professor, had co-written a university textbook which defined anti-Semitism as “hating Jews more than necessary.” Several months later, that newspaper was shut down by the government. The textbook is still in use.
Од неисцрпните бисери на #хорхе:
„Антисемитист е човек што ги мрази Евреите повеќе од потребното“
Извор: „Политички теории – Антика“; автори: д-р Ѓорге Иванов и д-р Светомир Шкариќ
Бонус: Звездан Георгиевски „Антисемитизам во претседателскиот двор“ > https://t.co/ABrH0f6FAs pic.twitter.com/CgcjflqgMv
— Neb. Gelevski – Bane (@banekoma) February 2, 2018
Tweet: One of the endless ‘pearls of wisdom’ by #Jorge [derogatory nickname for Gjorge Ivanov]:
“An anti-Semite is a person who hates Jews more than necessary”
Source: “Political theories – Antiquity”; authors Gjorge Ivanov, PhD, and Svetomir Škarić, PhD
Bonus: [link to an article by journalist] Zvezdan Georgievski “Antisemitism on the presidential court”
Photo: Excerpt from the book with the quote underlined, and photos of Ivanov and Škarić.
While not as common as in Bulgaria, swastika graffiti do pollute the walls of Macedonia too. Over the last several years, when graffiti of this nature appears, or when there is the occasional vandalism against the Jewish Cemetery in the southern city of Bitola, the public pays very little attention, and the perpetrators are not brought to justice.
An exception to the established practice of ignoring neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic hate speech is a recent announcement by the Macedonian police about the results of an investigation after swastika graffiti painted on the memorial museum of the uprising against fascism as well as some other buildings in the city of Prilep. On March 7, 2018, they issued an announcement that they filed charges against a suspect identified as K.D. (15) under the Criminal Code article 264 for “damage or destruction of protected objects, cultural heritage or natural rarities”.
Widespread understanding of the coded neo-Nazi symbols such as those displayed on the Plovdiv, Bulgaria monument is low. When in March 2016 a Macedonian right-wing politician and former member of parliament, Todor Petrov, used a megaphone branded with “SS 14 88″ (meaning Schutzstaffel, Fourteen Words, Heil Hitler) at a nationalist rally, the only reaction came from the then-European Union mediator of the negotiations between political parties, Belgian expert Peter Vanhoutte.
Several media quoted his Facebook post expressing outrage, but there were little additional actions by domestic actors or institutions. Petrov, who has close ties with VMRO-DPMNE, the former governing party which presents itself as center-right and as such is a member of European People's Party, has since stopped using the megaphone. However, he continues to participate in numerous hate-filled public events organized by their proxy groups, and is currently engaged in rallies and diaspora announcements against the negotiations regarding the Macedonia name issue.
Civil society activists and other progressive forces in the region have been warning for years about the corrosive effects of hate speech on social cohesion. It's no coincidence, then that in recent months, European institutions and NATO have declared that confronting extremism in the region is one of their top priorities.
I still can’t get it where is something rightist on (neo)nazism. Do they support individualism or free markets? Or they’re more for collectivism, society strictly organized by principles defined by their leaders and economy serving the state? Nazism means national socialism (here fits one of the Hitler’s quotes “Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites…” https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler ), brother of communism (with their love-hate relations and parallels). For me both are clearly leftist totalitarian ideologies.
Hello Tibor. The first reason why “right-wing” label is used for neo-Nazis and other kinds of fascists is that they most frequently identify themselves as such.
It is true historically that many of the leaders of such parties like B. Mussolini started their careers in politics as socialists or “leftists.” However their main ideological differences from socialists and communists is that they (even though they share some similar ‘values’) they have shown that they ascribe greater importance to ‘values’ associated with the ‘right’. For instance, chauvinistic nationalism and racism (as opposed to internationalism or cosmopolitanism preached by the Communists and to lesser degree socialists), adherence or ‘revival’ of ‘tradition’ (including whenever possible cooperation with the dominant Churches and various forms of conservationism) as opposed to Communist promotion of the value of the new, modern and ‘the future’, role of women (birth machines versus equal members of society – even though in Communist countries often more in theory than in practice), as well as–and possibly the biggest distinction since the 1930s–collusion with “top capital” class instead of dismantling the power of the economic elite (nationalization of industry and agriculture perpetrated by Communists).
Clear left vs right ideological differences are very hard to find across the political spectrum now days, possibly ever since the 1930s. Many analysts propose several dimensions, like attitude towards personal freedom vs state power. So even within the “left” there were/are huge differences between anarchists and communists, and there were many variations between communist parties resulting in very different kinds of socialism practiced around the world where they were in power – for instance in USSR and Yugoslavia. And the USSR under Stalin and USSR after Stalin seem like two quite different places to live… Often the differences are so great that the different ‘brands’ are named after their leaders like Stalinism, Maoism, Titoism, Hoxhism…
The contemporary populist parties which are mostly self-defined as right-wing seem like a mish-mash of different ideologies, if they have any ideology at all except ‘anything that can get us more votes/keep us in power.’ In Eastern Europe (or post-socialist countries) there are incredible mixes of policies in which such parties engage in – from neoliberal ‘free market’ dog-eat-dog health system to ‘pure’ socialist nanny state for some key groups like pensioners or farmers. At the same time they provide subsidies for oligarchs.
It’s a mess if you try to apply any ‘classic’ political science theory on them because they are inherently inconsistent (and a lot of time was lost until this was more widely understood) and syncretistic . As Umberto Eco put it “Syncretism is not only, as the dictionary says, ‘the combination of different forms of belief or practice’; such a combination must tolerate contradictions.” http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/
What complicates this issue even more is that in many cases in Eastern Europe the current “right wingers” are “turncoats” who were totalitarian Communists when Communism was in power. For instance in Macedonia the longest-ruling family (both literally a family and “a family” in mafia sense) has been part of the government for several decades… first the pater familias was Communist big shot (and army secret service operative) both within the party and as manager of state companies, then after independence he become government minister of police. Several years later his nephew become first minister of trade, then minister of finance, while his son got ever more senior jobs in the ministry of defense. A decade or so later, the nephew become prime minister, the son the chief of secret police, and ruled for 11 years… Their political transformation over these 3 decades run from hard-line communist towards even more extreme nationalists, but always ready for compromises in any form if that would help them retain power…
ok, but yes and no, see fights between chinese and russian national versions of communism, quasi cooperation in european neonazi scene (small example here soon), today they are able to honor both Hitler and Putin together, key industry nationalization is one of the programming points of slovak LSNS (see also “To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies” https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler even reality was a bit more complicated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Hitler's_views_on_economics ), in fact their main economic program is usually ‘whatever could be popular’, (and above promised) Mazurek from LSNS in Poland 2017: “All the Islamists can see … we never, never betray our Christian faith … God, honor and fatherland”, the same person in Slovakia left Church because “I regard Christianity as the cause of most of the evil in Europe … And I do not consider Christianity as European … I am sick of it” https://dennikn.sk/blog/943968/krestan-mazurek-v-polsku/