According to Myanmar Facebook users, their posts are being taken down by the popular social media company for containing the word ‘kalar’.
Although the etymology of the word is still debated , it is traditionally used to refer to people of east Indian origin or as an adjective meaning “Indian” in general. Facebook is censoring the word “kalar” or ကုလား (in Burmese script) as part of its initiative to tackle the problem of widespread hate speech on the Burmese language social network.
In recent years, the rise of radical nationalist movements has given the word an extremely derogatory connotation. ‘Kalar’ is used by ultra-nationalists and religious fundamentalists to attack Muslims in Myanmar especially the Rohingya minority in the northwest part of the country.
But in this effort to combat hate speech in Myanmar, the company has censored a good deal of viable content from its platform.
‘Kalar’ may be commonly associated with racism today, but the word on its own does not necessarily constitute hate speech. Context matters — many people have reported that posts in which they discussed the use of the term, or expressed concern about its usage, were censored as well.
Moreover, there are several Burmese words with completely different meanings that contain the same string of characters as ‘kalar’. For instance, chair in Burmese is also written ‘kalar htaing’, which contains the same characters, as well as other words such as ‘kalar pae’ (split pea), ‘kalar oat’ (camel) or ‘kalarkaar’ (curtain).
Aung Kaung Myat , writer, explained on Facebook the different meanings of words that sound like ‘kalar':
A post made by one of my friends was deleted today because there was the word, kalar, in it. However, he was wittily asking his friends if they know where he can cure his lower back pain by using a pun. The phrase, ku la — ‘cure’ (ku) + question word (la) in Burmese language — bears striking resemblance verbatim with the racist term but they are wholly different in context.
There have been various reactions to this initiative of Facebook. Zin Win Htet  thinks that it will reduce hate speech posts of radical nationalists, but also stressed that Facebook needs to be more analytical before it removes any post suspected of promoting racism:
ကု@#လား ဆိုတဲ့ word ကို Facebook Team က manually ဖျက်တာမဟုတ်ဘူးလေ.. ဒီတိုင်းစကားလုံးကို တိုက်စစ်ပြီး auto လုပ်သွားတာ.. အဲတာကြောင့် status ကအကြောင်းရာဘာရေးရေး နားလည်မှာမဟုတ်.. ဖြစ်သင့်တာ တိုက်စစ်တဲ့ method (may be Regular Expression) မှာ ကပ်ရပ် စကားလုံးတွေပါ validate လုပ်ထားသင့်တယ် ကု@#လားထိုင်တို့ ကု@#လားပဲတို့ အစရှိသဖြင့်.. ကောင်းတဲ့အချက်ကတော့ မျိုးညစ်အကောင့်တွေ hate speech တွေလျှောက်ဖြန့်နေတာကို ကောင်းကောင်း သမလို့ရသွားတာပဲ.. မဘသ လဲဦးကျိုးသွားပြီ.. ခုချိန်မှာ nationalism ကို စောစောစီးစီးဦးချိုးပစ်သင့်နေဘီ..
Facebook team is not manually deleting the word “Kalar”. It automatically filters the word. That's why it won't understand any status you write. What it should do is that they should carefully analyse post and validate using the words beside it. For instance, “Kalar Htine” (chair) and “Kalar pae” (split peas). The good thing is that these dirty nationalists who are spreading hate-speech will have a pretty good lesson. Now it's time to curtail their nationalism.
While the move may send a strong signal to those spouting hate speech, the efficacy of this strategy might not last long. The experiences of social media platforms in China, such as Sina Weibo and WeChat, have proven that keyword censorship often becomes a game of cat-and-mouse , wherein social media users will simply begin using a new word or alternate spelling  of the censored word in order to keep expressing their views.
Writer Aung Kaung Myat  described how Facebook started to remove his posts when he simply notified his friends that the word ‘kalar’ is already banned on the social network:
…when I discovered this new policy of Facebook, I made a post telling my Facebook friends the word is banned. Ironically, my post was removed by Facebook and I was banned from liking, posting, and sharing content on Facebook for 24 hours because the post “doesn’t follow the Facebook Community Standards”.
Facebook has removed numerous posts by people who do not have any negative intentions or who were simply trying to show their opinions against the hate speech used by radical nationalists.
Patrick Murphy  wrote that his post not related to hate speech was taken down:
Chan Myae Khine  believes Facebook should have done more before launching this initiative like consulting the Burmese Internet community:
Facebook  might have good intention to minimise racism in Burma through their platform but that's not how it works. Censoring such words will just bring more hatred among different communities. Plus, they seemed to initiate that without proper local context nor tech support hence banning words like “chair” and “pea curry”. Even when they found out that they made mistakes, they don't attempt to rectify wrongly deleted posts. If only they could respect a bit more to 15 million user base that's generating a great revenue for them, it'd be great.
Facebook's automated censorship has made users to mock its approach. Instead of taking it seriously, users are now making fun of Facebook by deliberately writing the word ‘kalar’ in non-hate speech context to see if their posts would be taken down.
Here are some screenshots of Facebook posts that have been removed despite containing nothing resembling hate speech:
Over the past five years, Myanmar has seen the rise of extreme nationalist ideology and religious fundamentalists who have been using social media to amplify their voices and influence. Hate speech is blamed, among others, for stirring  communal violence in Myanmar, especially in the Rakhine state where clashes between Muslims and Buddhists displaced thousands of residents.
Facebook was criticitized for its failure to tackle the rampant hate speech occurring on its Burmese pages. But instead of simply deciding to censor the word ‘kalar’, it should have reviewed and learned from ongoing initiatives  that aim to combat  online hate speech in Myanmar that focus on context, rather than code.