Award-Winning Hong Kong Political Cartoonist Refuses Self-Censorship · Global Voices
inmediahk.net

Arto's award-winning piece (full image inside text). Via inmediahk.net
Arto is a cartoonist from Hong Kong who won Best Political Cartoon in the 2016 E-Citizen Awards, organized by the civic groups Hong Kong In-Media (inmediahk.net) and the Culture and Media Education Foundation to promote original reporting, political cartoons, video documentary and photography online.
Below is an interview with Arto conducted by Betty Lau, which was originally published in two parts in Chinese on inmediahk.net on December 17, 2016 and January 23, 2017. The English translation is published on Global Voices as part of a partnership with inmediahk.net.
Arto started participating in local protest movements in 2010 when Hong Kong's Legislative Council passed a budget for the construction of the Rapid Railway connecting China's Shenzhen to Hong Kong. He said:
看到整個制度如何不堪，你沒可能不出聲，身為一個香港人。
It is impossible for you not to speak up against the rotten system if you identify yourself as a Hong Konger.
Previously a graphic designer, he only started drawing online in 2011. At first he drew for fun; he published his first set, titled “Golden Creature Card,” on the popular platform Golden Forum. From there, he became an online celebrity. Later, his work became more political:
你真係對於那些事一種義憤、有一種感受，就變了畫那些事。
When incidents trigger emotion, anger, they turn into drawings.
But it is very difficult to develop a career as a political cartoonist in Hong Kong. Sometimes, his clients ask him not to use the name Arto on jobs because the name is too political.
In 2016, as he was gathering his online works into a book, the publisher asked him to remove some politically sensitive content. At first, the publisher referred to a drawing related to Chinese President Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party as sensitive. Then they wanted him to remove content that carried China’s national flag and the flag of Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, arguing that the works might violate the National Flag and National Emblem Ordinance and the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem Ordinance.
A publisher told Arto that some of his work may have violated the law. Below is one of the pieces accusing the Hong Kong chief executive of destroying Hong Kong's core values. Image via inmediahk.net.
According to the two ordinances, anyone who desecrates the flags and emblems by publicly and willfully burning, mutilating, scrawling on, defiling or trampling on them risks a fine of 50,000 Hong Kong dollars (approximately 6,000 US dollars) and three years in prison.
Arto said:
我覺得非常非常之無稽。畫時事嘢，好難避免畫這些圖案[…]而且我覺得是過份憂慮，香港出版界從來未試過因為國旗法，而不能直接出國旗或區徽。
The incident is so ridiculous. How can you avoid flags in political cartoons? […] They worried too much. So far there is no case against Hong Kong publishers using those ordinances.
He then contacted another small publisher and all the works were printed without issue. He criticized the self-censorship practices that are currently common in Hong Kong as pathetic:
你是在揣摩政府可能因此控告出版社，導致要收書。我覺得這有違我畫時事漫畫的精神。如果我退讓，以後都有這些制肘，不能畫五星旗、區徽，是不是極之荒謬呢？
You speculate that the government may sue the publisher, and so decide to censor the work. The whole incident goes against my principles. If I give in, similar things will happen again and again and eventually no one can draw the national and regional flags and emblems. Isn’t that ridiculous?
With the space for political cartoons in printed media is shrinking, Arto releases his works mainly online. His award-winning cartoon, “After the reinterpretation of the Basic Law” was first published on his Facebook account with thousands of likes and shares.
Arto's award-winning piece. Via inmediahk.net
He drew the cartoon after China's Standing Committee of the National Congress exercised its unrestrained power to interpret Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, known as the Basic Law, in November 2016. That “reinterpretation” was in response to two Hong Kong lawmakers who altered the wording of their oaths to pledge allegiance to “the Hong Kong nation” instead of Hong Kong as a special administrative region of of the People's Republic of China.
The Standing Committee, China's top legislative body, said politicians who do not correctly swear the oath will be barred from office, preempting a local court's ruling on whether the two independent lawmakers should be disqualified for their actions. The move was criticized by many as hampering Hong Kong's autonomy.
Arto could only express his anger and sense of helplessness over the situation through drawing. The result was a cartoon featuring the statue of Themis, which is a symbol of justice erected outside the old Hong Kong Legislative Council and currently at the Court of Final Appeal, draped by China’s national flag. The weight of a hammer and sickle, the symbol of the Chinese Communist Party, tips the scale she's holding.
Arto attached the following comment to his work:
話說，最不守法律、最缺乏真誠的黨，要以法律裁決別人是否真誠。
The most insincere, unlawful party wants to use law to judge whether a person is sincere.
Arto believes that political cartoons can stimulate people to think deeper on complicated politics:
用輕鬆的手法，讓人一眼看懂事件的大概，再去讀比較複雜的資訊，就如一個踏腳石。我一直都以這個想法，去畫時事漫畫
By using humor and light-hearted presentation, [the cartoon] can help people to develop an impression of social and political events. Then they may have the motivation to read more concerning the events. It is like a stepping stone. This is my philosophy when drawing political cartoons.
Social media has helped him in his creative journey:
在傳統紙媒，你真係要揭那幾頁才會看到時事漫畫，普通一個師奶可能只看頭版或娛樂版；但網絡就不同，可能無端端在飲飲食食、生活瑣事的帖子之間，有個時事漫畫彈出來。
In conventional printed media, you have to flip a few pages and find the cartoon. But ordinary readers may just read the front page and entertainment news. The internet is different, the cartoon can pop up anytime when you are eating a meal or sharing your status about everyday life.