See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

The Anti-KFC Protests Spell Trouble for Chinese Authorities Trying to Confine Nationalism to the Internet

Protests outside KFC. The banner said, "Boycott Japanese and American products, I am Chinese and will be a model. Kick KFC and McDonald out of China." Photos from letscop's Twitter.

Protests outside KFC. The banner said, “Boycott Japanese and American products, I am Chinese and will be a model. Kick KFC and McDonald out of China.” Photos from letscorp's Twitter.

For years, authorities under President Xi Jinping have stoked nationalistic sentiments in China as part of a larger campaign to push Chinese Communist Party ideology. Part of that effort includes “civilization” volunteers, who are recruited by the Communist Youth League and tasked with spreading the party's message online.

“Online” being the key word. It seems protesting in the street is a step too far for the Chinese government, which finds itself at the moment in the odd position of denouncing demonstrations against American fast food chain KFC — fueled by the very brand of aggressive nationalism they helped foment.

Since July 16, Chinese people in at least a dozen towns and cities have protested in front of KFC restaurants because they are seen as representing the interests of the United States. Many in China think US meddling helped lead to an embarrassing ruling on July 12, in which an international tribunal shot down Beijing’s extensive claims over the South China Sea.

Videos showing protesters confronting KFC customers have also gone viral on social media, where the rallies were organized.

‘An action to manifest Chinese determination and attitude’

The call to protest can be traced back to Zhu Jidong, the deputy director of the National Cultural Security and Ideology Construction Research Center under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The center organizes training courses for online commenters and is active in delivering ideological instruction on social media through its official account, @IdeologyTorch (思想火炬).

In reaction to the South China Sea ruling, Zhu suggested in a July 13 post on Weibo two days of boycott against American fast food companies:

#思想微評#[舉國不去肯德基和麥當勞消費:你能做到嗎?]舉國上下在某一天集中做一種舉動,就會形成大的震憾:倡議這個周六、周日(7月16日和7月17日),舉國不去肯德基和麥當勞消費,只須兩天,世界將為之嘩然。這個倡議,兩天時間,不會傷害任何人,但可以表明中國人的決心和態度!

#Mini Comment on Ideology# National boycott against KFC and McDonald's. Can you do this? The whole nation taking the same action on the same day will create a shock. Proposed for this Saturday and Sunday (July 16 and 17), national boycott against KFC and McDonald's. It takes two days to shake the world. This proposal will only take two days and it won't harm anyone. But it is an action to manifest Chinese determination and attitude.

On the same day, Global Times, which is owned by the official newspaper group of the Chinese Communist Party, published commentary saying that the South China Sea ruling spurred a new wave of patriotism.

Meanwhile, the Communist Youth League published a Weibo post citing research that says Chinese media outlets are “controlled by capitalists” which has resulted in homogeneous opinion in the public sphere. As the current ideological battle being waged online in China has “patriots” and “red” culture on one side and “US sympathizers” and “liberals” on another, some interpreted the post as suggesting that people take revolutionary action in response to the South China Sea arbitration against capitalistic liberal forces’ attempts to suppress patriotic sentiments and reactions.

Around the same time, an adapted version of Zhu Jidong's push for boycott quickly went viral on social media such as messaging app WeChat. Many assumed that these calls to action were coming from the Communist Youth League's online civilization volunteers because Zhu Jidong is a member of the League's think tank.

On July 16, as shown in video clips recorded by citizens, some patriotic youths started harassing customers at KFC asking if they had heard of the South China Sea arbitration and telling them to leave. The online call for boycott soon developed into street quarrels, fist fights and then widespread protests.

Some of the slogans used in the protests included:

你们吃的美国肯德基,丢的是老祖宗的脸。
将来打仗的话,每一颗炮弹都是你们赞助的。
如果吃了肯德基,将来都是汉奸。

Those who eat in the American KFC is trashing the face of your ancestor.
If there is war in the future, you are sponsoring their bullets now.
Eating in KFC makes you a Chinese traitor.

The patriotic juggernaut rolls on

The real-life protests crossed a line set by the party and the government. On July 16, the Communist Youth League attempted to cut its ties to the demonstrations, claiming that they were initiated by “fans of the US” on Weibo.

But the KFC rallies continued and by July 18 had spread to more than a dozen cities. Worries swirled that if the mobilization got out of control, it could threaten the country's economic security.

To cool down the patriotic sentiments, propaganda authorities issued censorship instructions to all media outlets (via China Digital Times):

Once again, for the near future, do not hype or spread information related to illegal rallies and demonstrations. Pay close attention and delete inflammatory information.

On the same day, Hu Shijun, chief editor of Global Times, also tried to distance the publication from the protests by calling the participants “SB,” meaning “stupid ass.”

But the censorship instructions and public disavowals didn't stop the movement. On July 19, photos showing a group of primary school kids protesting outside a KFC restaurant in Shandong province went viral on social media.

Later, netizens discovered that the protest was led by a teacher during the students’ social learning program, which is organized by Tsingda Xuexi, an educational institution also affiliated with the Communist Youth League. Moreover, protesters were not only targeting KFC, but now also other US brands like Apple.

The party's opinion channeling machine then kicked into full gear to try to contain the situation. Major news portals published editorials denouncing the protests. The English-language editorial of state-owned newspaper China Daily questioned, “Why target firms for the sins of US and Philippines?

A Chinese version of the piece, written by an author using a pseudonym, labelled the protests as gaojihei (高級黑), meaning “second-level smearing” or patriotism taken too far. China Daily's Weibo account distributed it on July 19 with the title, “Visiting KFC and McDonald's = unpatriotic hypocrisy? We would be part of the second-level smearing!” A brief introduction read:

【吃肯德基麦当劳=虚伪不爱国?我们才不当高级黑!】爱国是不吃肯德基和麦当劳,是打人、砸车、抢东西?当缺乏常识的人,热衷于做别人的老师时,那就是愚昧的开始。少一点冲动,多一点常识。少一点抵制,多一点实干。这便是正确的爱国方式,你的样子,就是中国未来的样子。

Visiting KFC and McDonald's = unpatriotic hypocrisy? We would be part of the second-level smearing! Patriotism is boycotting KFC and McDonald's? Patriotism is to beat up people, smash cars and rob? When people without common sense are eager to become the teacher, this is the beginning of a dark age. Less impulse, more common sense, less boycott, more concrete practice. This is the right way to love the country. Your face is the future face of China.

The article explained why a boycott would not work and how it could harm China's own economy:

在经济全球化的今天,衣食住行涉及的大大小小产品,几乎全是你中有我、我中有你的“混血儿”——国产家用电脑的CPU多是美国产的,而美国波音747的客机里也会有中国生产的零部件。
至于麦当劳和肯德基,我们早就成了他们的股东,抵制他们就是抵制我们自己。
更重要的是,麦当劳和肯德基涉及的上下游行业太多,那么多的中国老百姓在这条产业链上工作,他们没饭吃了你来养?

We are living in a globalized era, everything produced is a co-production — local computer brands have CPUs made in the US and Boeing 747s have parts made in China.
As for KFC and McDonald's, we are already part of their shareholders, boycotting them is boycotting ourselves.

Moreover, KFC and McDonald's have a stake in other industries, how many Chinese are working in the production chain, who will feed them if they lose their jobs?

‘Online patriotism and offline patriotism are different’

The KFC protests reveal that authorities have been playing with fire in their ideological campaign — if people enacted the beliefs that have been pushed on them, such as kicking out all foreign “enemies,” in the real world, China's economy would suffer the consequences.

The party and the government are well aware of the paradox, and that's why the line between online and offline nationalism must remain firm, journalist Song Zhi Biao argued:

线上爱国与线下爱国是根本不同的,这是共青团中央、环球时报、人民日报、胡锡进、诸多五毛大V深知的、而且是非常显著的界线。如果要跨过这条界线,需要许可,绝对不能擅自跨越,否则就是不守规矩,是要负责的。但爱国群众心里无界,不听招呼盲打盲冲。
官媒及传统爱国势力一致否定肯德基爱国事件,否认这些群众是由他们发动的,甚至不顾自个那些赫然在目的煽动性微博,竭力甩锅,乃至于把黑锅推给传说中的公知 […]

Online patriotism and offline patriotism are different. The line is clear to the Communist Youth League, Global Times, China Daily, Hu Shijun and government opinion leaders. The line cannot be crossed without prior approval [from the top] or else someone has to take responsibility. However, the line does not exist among the patriotic masses; they would just do what they think is right.

State mouthpieces and patriotic organizations all spoke out against the KFC protests, denying that they had a role in the protests even though they had distributed so many posts and incited nationalistic sentiments. They even created a conspiracy theory that the liberal public intellectuals were behind the protests. […]

Chen Pokong, a US-based political commentary writer, echoed Song's comments and saw the protests as an inevitable outcome of online nationalism:

既不能打仗,又不能抗议。于是,爱国贼们转谋下策。呼吁抵制外国商品,成为发泄手段之一。近些年来,爱国贼们一直忙不迭地呼吁。因为钓鱼岛,呼吁抵制日货;因为美国巡航南海,呼吁抵制美货;因为南海争端,呼吁抵制菲律宾货、越南货;因为萨德导弹防御系统,呼吁抵制韩国货……于是,摆样子的相片里,抗议的横幅越拉越长:“坚决抵制美日韩菲越货……”
口号喊得震天响,然而,现实生活中,抵制外国货的中国人,寥寥无几。于是,有些爱国贼们跑到肯德基和麦当劳等美式快餐店,高举红旗,高唱国歌,堵住门口,不准顾客进入。

[The reality] is that there is no war, and they are forbidden to have proper protests. Hence the patriotic thieves look for other ways to manifest patriotism, and boycotting foreign brands is one of the most frequently used tactics. In recent years, they have kept advocating — they boycotted Japanese products because of Diaoyu Island disputes, they boycotted US products after the US navy entered the South Sea, they boycotted Philippine and Vietnamese products because of the South Sea disputes, they boycotted Korean products because of the missile defense system… That's why in the photos, you can see the list of boycotted products keeps growing longer and longer: “We are determined to boycott the US, Japanese, Korean, Philippine and Vietnamese products….” The slogans are loud, but in reality very few Chinese people take action in a boycott. That's why some patriotic thieves decided to wave red flags and sing national anthems outside KFC and McDonald's fast food restaurants, blocking the entrances.

While official government sources blamed the protests on “second-level smearing” fueled by fans of the US, and others argued they were a spontaneous movement, some still

While the official patriots said the anti-KFC protests are second level smearing fueled by the U.S fans, others believed that the protests are spontaneously organized, some still believed the Chinese Communist Party and the government orchestrated the entire thing. On Twitter, @SANDY666712 wrote:

Look, China is full of democracy, freedom and human rights! This year, those who lead the protests against KFC are not ordinary people. Many are police, aunties from the party's residential committee and secondary school teachers and students who receive instruction from their seniors. Then the government steps in, releasing press releases and public notices to stop the rallies. They are manipulating from behind the scenes and benefiting from the action. Such tactics were used during the Cultural Revolution [a period of social and political upheaval in the 1960s and 1970s], they caught and released the ghosts who are controlled by the government. The performance is for outsiders.

Our work building bridges across cultures, languages and perspectives is more urgent than ever before.

Learn more about Global Voices »

Donate now

Close