See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

What It's Like to Come Forward About Sexual Harassment in the Russian Opposition

A supporter of Alexey Navalny joins a crowd outside the Russian parliament. Photo: Vladimir Varfolomeev / CC 2.0.

A supporter of Alexey Navalny joins a crowd outside the Russian parliament. Photo: Vladimir Varfolomeev / CC 2.0.

It’s election season in Russia, with a national vote scheduled to take place later this year in mid-September. In December 2011, the last time the country went to the polls to elect the men and women who make up the federal parliament, apparent voter fraud helped spark mass protests in Moscow that briefly challenged the political stability that has characterized Vladimir Putin’s now 16 years in power.

Today, the anti-Kremlin opposition movement isn’t doing so well. The opposition’s best hope for getting even a handful of candidates on the ballot was dashed recently, when the so-called “Democratic Coalition” collapsed. To make matters worse, hackers later sabotaged the primary voting of the one registered party within the coalition. And now allegations of unchecked and unpunished sexual harassment—on the campaign team of the Russian opposition's most visible face, Alexey Navalny—are boiling to the surface.

The latest blow

Earlier this week, Russia’s democratic opposition suffered its latest blow, when Alexey Navalny appeared on Dozhd television to answer viewers’ questions live on the air. One of the questions was from Maxim Katz, who helped manage part of Navalny’s Moscow mayoral campaign in 2013. Just before the actual election (there’s some dispute about whether it was two weeks or four days before the vote), Katz changed roles within the campaign, and he and Navalny's camp have been estranged ever since.

Katz asked Navalny to explain why he’s declined to support Katz’s various political efforts since Navalny lost the mayoral race, including Katz’s Moscow city Duma run in 2014 and Duma deputy Dmitry Gudkov’s current reelection campaign, which Katz now manages.

In his response to Katz, Navalny didn’t mince words, calling him a “dishonest” “con man.” Navalny went on to list various political disagreements with Katz, arguing that Katz’s support for a former Moscow city official accused of hiding assets contradicts the principles of anti-corruption activism, which is Navalny’s primary activity. Katz soon responded in a blog post, detailing his work in the 2013 mayoral campaign, and accusing Navalny of slander.

More than a squabble about strategy

Arguments like this, between oppositionists about the best organizing strategies, are not uncommon in Russia. What happened next, however, was uncommon: Catrin Patyulina, another staffer in the mayoral campaign, publicly accused Navalny’s campaign manager, Leonid Volkov, of sexual harassment. Hours after Navalny’s appearance on Dozhd TV, the popular photoblogger (and Katz’s longtime friend and business partner) Ilya Varlamov published a long text written by Patyulina, where she said Volkov stalked her, showered her in text messages, and cornered her at the campaign headquarters—all after she says she made it clear to him that the attention was unwanted.

Patyulina says Volkov fired Katz when he suspected the two had become romantic, arguing that Katz’s ouster was not the result of political differences, as Navalny claimed on television. According to Patyulina, when she told Navalny about Volkov’s sexual harassment, Navalny responded, “And I thought he only wanted to fuck you! But it turns out it’s not that simple.”

Not only did Navalny refuse to take disciplinary action against Volkov, but he later supported Volkov’s decision to remove Katz, Patyulina says. After the campaign, when Patyulina returned from Cuba on a vacation with Katz, Navalny replaced her within his anti-corruption organization, allegedly accusing her of being “one of Katz’s spies.”

Volkov responds

Navalny has refused to comment any further about his past with Maxim Katz, which apparently includes any reactions to the sexual-harassment accusations against Volkov, who remains one of Navalny’s closest political allies. Volkov, meanwhile, has responded. In a Facebook post that he says is his final word on the subject, Volkov focused mostly on demonstrating that Katz indeed deserved to be fired, arguing that he was lazy and, at one point, even threatened to go to the police, if the campaign adopted a controversial plan to stage a sit-in at Moscow’s election commission, in the event of widespread voter fraud.

Volkov addressed Patyulina’s accusations, too, denying that he harassed her. Like many who have criticized Patyulina for going public, Volkov drew attention to the fact that she published screenshots of his text messages to her, where he flirted with her persistently, aggressively, and unrequitedly. “Publishing personal messages is unethical,” he argued, likening her revelations to the hidden camera footage defaming oppositionists that regularly airs on pro-Kremlin television networks. Volkov then shared his thoughts on being in love:

Мне не хотелось бы подробно комментировать: да, был влюблен; да, ухаживал; нет, не домогался; нет, все было не совсем так, как Катя рассказывает; мы общались на протяжении нескольких месяцев, и там были, понятно, разные эмоциональные моменты, как с положительным, так и с отрицательным знаком. […] Влюбленность — прекрасное состояние души, желаю его всем почаще испытывать, даже невзирая на то, что ваши смски, процитированные три года спустя, могут казаться вам самому и вашим друзьям очень глупыми и несколько дней над вами будут шутить смешные и не очень шутки. Это все равно того стоит.

I’ll just say this: yes, I was in love. Yes, I courted her. No, I didn’t harass her. No, it wasn’t the way Katya says—we chatted for a few months, and there were different emotional moments, both good and bad. […] It’s wonderful to be in love. I hope everyone gets to experience it, even if your text messages, quoted three years later, might seem to you and all your friends to be very stupid, and for a few days you’re the butt of a bunch of funny and not-so-funny jokes. It’s still worth it.

As evidence that he did not harass Patyulina, Volkov pointed out that they both appeared together on stage at the Techcrunch Moscow event in December 2013, where they discussed their work on Navalny’s campaign. The event was three months after the election. “How’s that for ‘harassment’ and ‘deadly insults’?” Volkov asked rhetorically, parroting a phrase that Patyulina never used.

Leonid Volkov and Catrin Patyulina present at Techcrunch Moscow. December 13, 2013. Photo: Facebook

‘He knows what he did’

Patyulina told RuNet Echo that her decision to accompany Volkov to the Techcrunch event is unrelated to Volkov’s conduct during the campaign. “I wanted to talk about my work of which I'm proud. We met in public and never met again,” she says.

Patyulina says she decided to go public with her story within 15 minutes of hearing Navalny’s comments on Dozhd TV. “I wasn't prepared at all, so I started searching through my archives in order to find proof [of Volkov’s harassment].” She says she scrambled to put her story into words, sending it to Varlamov at about 5 in the morning, the next day.

Asked what she makes of Volkov’s response, Patyulina said, “I think he's trying to make my words less significant and discuss other matters. He certainly knows he violated my personal boundaries and—though I said that I didn't want any of that—he continued his pressure.” She cites an email sent in September 2013, where Volkov apparently apologized for creating an unhealthy office environment. “He might think he was ‘just in love’ or something,” Patyulina says. “But when we discussed it later, I pointed out that it was harassment, and he never denied it.”

Following Patyulina’s revelations, initial reactions to the story had surprisingly little to say about sexual harassment. As already noted, Volkov focused much of his response on dissecting Katz’s record as a campaign manager. Katz’s response, too, concentrated on debunking these accusations. Curiously, both Patyulina and Volkov don’t even write the term “sexual harassment” in Russian, spelling it out in English, like a foreign product.

‘Feminist bullshit’

Virtually the only public figure to shine a light on sexual harassment in this story has been Maria Baronova, who’s currently running for a spot in the Duma. (Until recently, Baronova was running parallel to Lyubov Sobol, one of Navalny’s closest allies, and someone Katz once fired from Navalny’s mayoral campaign.) Baronova’s Facebook post has attracted 146 “likes,” but many of the comments dismiss Patyulina’s accusations.

Interpreting the leaked text messages, critics say Patyulina reciprocated Volkov’s advances. Others, particularly the well-known publicist and editor Dmitry Olshansky, seem to believe that Patyulina committed a greater offense, when she shared Volkov’s text messages. Olshansky also argues that sexual harassment is impossible without “physical harm” or “direct threats.” He calls Patyulina’s claims “feminist bullshit.”

Patyulina told RuNet Echo that she hoped she’d never have to revisit her experience with Volkov, but she “couldn’t stand the lies” about her friend, Maxim Katz. Responding to our questions about her story, the attention seemed to surprise her. “Nobody else is interested in this,” she said.

According to sociological survey data, at least a quarter of the women in Russia say they've experienced sexual harassment in the workplace. This figure has remained relatively unchanged since 1999. In June last year, federal lawmakers rejected a legislative proposal by Russia's Association of Attorneys to make sexual harassment a criminal offense. If you'd like to know more about Russians’ legal rights in matters of sexual harassment, visit the website of the Center for Social and Labor Rights. (In Russian.)
  • Kris

    Waiting for the essay on: “What it’s like to come forward with an interpretation of the Russian language Internet?”

    The diagnosis of N’s nonacceptance of any cooperation with K as the result of “a squabble about strategy” and thus to be disregarded is an amazing slippery slope, on a par with the move from ‘sexual herasment’ to ‘feminist bullshit’.

    • Kevin Rothrock

      I’m absolutely not suggesting that disagreements like those between Navalny and Katz should be disregarded. This is simply not that story.

      • Kris

        Agreed. Then why are you not telling that story? As it stands, your article is about the “apparent coverup” of the sexual harassment incident as a proper explanation why Navalny has distanced himself from Katz. Catrin unambiguously uses the harassment story in this context.

        Concerning the harassment: It would apt to provide here the translation of Catrin’s text in full.

        • Kris

          “Arguments like this, between oppositionists about the best organizing strategies, are not uncommon in Russia.”

          Ehm.

          As a deputy head of N’s campaignin 2013, Katz threatens the campaign headquarters with reports to police (i.e., Russian police in Putin’s Russia); announces publically that elections are lost before final results are out; denounces publically N’s appeal to fight for the 1,5% separating him from the second round; writes a blog on the theme what I did as a mastermind of a (failed, but successful enough) campaign, again, at the time the election results are not yet out and no official statement by N’s team is released; claims straight after the elections that N’s opponent is a better mayor, and that no one in N’s team believed in his victory.

          Pretty uncommon even for Russia.

          There was no public interaction professional or personal between N and K since then.

          Now the story that you tell goes along Catrin’s lines: Навальный выбрал дальнейшее сотрудничество с тем, кто явно был неправ, но был лоялен ему лично. Макс в эту ситуацию попал вообще из-за банальной ревности Волкова. Конечно, Навальный должен был это остановить, а не врать теперь в прямом эфире “Дождя”.

          It is clear to many that N. is hardly ‘slandering’ K. for calling him professionally indecent, when K. insists N. explains his ignorance of him and his political activivities after the compaign. The reaction to Catrin’s post (and yours) is negative not because of the public ignorance of the sexual harassment story, but because the story, unfortunately, is soaked in highly questionable political manoeuvres of Katz willing to ‘clear his reputation’ as he and Catrin repeatedly state. Both her motivation to tell the story at this time and her conclusions allegedly defend Katz against N’s ‘slander’. Moreover, K. himself concludes the story—i.e., the story which has begun as a coming forward about sexual harassment—as the story about N. being scared of a new young charismatic leader (meaning himself) instead.

          You are right; this is exactly what it is like to come forward about sexual harassment in the Russian opposition. But what are you doing?

          • Kevin Rothrock

            I appreciate that you feel the conflict between Navalny and Katz is essential to telling Patyulina’s story. I agree, to a degree, and that is why I summarized it in this article. I respectfully disagree that reactions to her sexual-harassment accusations have nothing to do with the public’s ignorance of sexual harassment. Yes, the Navalny-Katz conflict is why we now know about Patyulina’s accusations, but her claims (and Volkov’s denial) is a separate, also very serious issue.

            Reading over people’s reactions, I’m aware that many of Patyulina’s critics believe she’s only scheming to injure her boyfriend’s rival (and, by extension, people assume that my article is part of Katz’s “information war”). I think this, too, is a manifestation of attitudes about sexual harassment in Russia.

            I also don’t share your skepticism that the contretemps between Navalny and Katz are terribly unique. As a close observer of politics within the Russian opposition for several years, the nature of their disagreements seems to me to be perfectly ordinary, however heated. As I said before, that is a story worth telling, too. But I told a different one that’s equally important, in my view.

        • Kevin Rothrock

          “Catrin unambiguously uses the harassment story in this context.”

          I plainly address in the text above Patyulina’s stated motivations for the timing of her revelations. I’ll also say that I’m uncomfortable with your phrase “uses the harassment.”

          • Kris

            “I agree, to a degree, and that is why I summarized it in this article.”

            This addresses my initial concern with your article. You see a girl coming out with the story; she does it for wrong reasons and keeps insisting on a wrong kind of retribution (she wants N to admit lies about Katz)… fine, whatever helps. You take up this convoluted story in its entirety, including every political insinuation and accusation she makes (omitting weaker moments in her actual harassment story… fine, whatever helps the course). Such a story only adds to the ignorance of the herassment (which is OK, since your are not writing for the Russian audience), but it also injects a new portion of ‘slander’, which your readers have no means to detect.

            For the story you want to tell, it would be much more potent to disregard the heated political backgorund; or if you were keen to include it, perhaps, a much more detailed background on Katz-Navalny defamation story should be necessary.

            You are right, no one cares about the actual harassment story—even the people bringing it up. P keeps posting she wants N to admit he lies about K, while Katz on his Periscope today: “Навальному надо просто извинится за ложь, которую он расспространил; а так же Волкову за секшуал херрасмент может, или может нет… и все, и спокойно этот вопрос может быть улажен.” No one cares, as long as N acknowledges K.

            Your article would be critical about the ignorance of the sexual herassment in Russian opposition, if you would address the motivation/retribution/reception involved, while distancing from the political context althogehter. This would indeed be a cold shower. This is not a story about the “apparent coverup” but a story about no one gives a ****, even the parties involved.

          • Kris

            As apparently no one minds the picture in the office of the cheaf editor of Эхо Москва.

            Thank you for your answers!

          • Kevin Rothrock

            Venediktov has done far worse than this. Don’t forget his revelations in this interview, which nobody seems to remember:

            http://www.maximonline.ru/longreads/interview/_article/aleksej-venediktov/

            Возвращаясь к теме покаяния – давай вспомним грехи молодости.

            Какие там у меня грехи? Банальный московский мальчик, школа, институт, потом работа в школе. Просто нет места преступлениям… Ну секс с ученицами…

            Секс с ученицами?! Скукотища какая… Ну ладно, расскажи, что ли.

            А что тут такого? Со старшеклассницами – это в школе обычная история.

          • Kevin Rothrock

            When I say “coverup,” as relates to Patyulina’s alleged sexual harassment, it doesn’t mean that Navalny “lies” about why he fired Katz, but that he apparently took no disciplinary actions against Volkov, following Patyulina’s complaint.

  • Kris

    *harassment

  • Anonymous

    It’s not just people in power, at least in the U.S. Black males in the State of Maryland (state near Washington, D.C.) do this everyday. They are usually dark skinned, ghetto black males who seek to rob the dignity and safety of all women: blackmanleaveusalone [dot] wordpress [dot] com

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site