See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Another Pretend Election Yields Predictable Results in Azerbaijan


Mehriban Aliyeva, First Lady of Azerbaijan, does not make much use of her seat in parliament. Wikipedia image.

In a result that surprised nobody, the ruling party belonging to the ruling family cruised to a comfortable majority in Azerbaijan's November 1 parliamentary election.

Nevertheless, while there is nothing new about the New Azerbaijan Party loyal to President Ilham Aliyev recording a crushing electoral victory, there were some interesting features that marked this vote out from others in the past.

For one, ballot stuffing was no longer a hurried affair taking place in the final hours of election day. Already in the morning, independent observers were reporting serious violations:

Fraud. Precinct 12, at both polling stations 30 and 23, ballot stuffing. [Tweet from early on in the vote].

Carousel voting was also more efficient and better organised than in previous years. Women, students, and other mixed groups were responsible for going from one polling station to another and casting multiple votes:

[Journalist Ulviyya Ali took these pictures]: Precinct 21. Polling stations 1 and 2. People brought here for carousel voting.

This video footage below shows another dose of ballot stuffing in Surakhani's 3rd precinct. This time with the precinct chairman caught in the act.

Some Azeri officials even laughed as they cheated the citizenry, according to local reporters. Certainly the shame factor vis-a-vis vote rigging has long ago disappeared.

It has been replaced by a brute determination and confidence, embodied in the claim of newly elected MP Aflatun Amashov that “if there were violations then they were minuscule, and they wont have impact on the outcome of the elections.”

These were moreover the first elections that were not observed by any credible international monitoring mission. OSCE’s ODIHR, OSCEPA and the European Parliament all cancelled their missions ahead of the election.

The only international observers present were the representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. But PACE’s past relations with Azerbaijan have been overshadowed by ‘caviar diplomacy’ and the compromised reports of prior monitoring missions.

Thus it was disappointing if not shocking when a PACE representative made the following statement:

Despite over 1,200 registered candidates, some 500 pulled out of the parliamentary race leaving 767 candidates running for the 125-seat parliament. Key opposition parties withdrew candidates from the race. The opposition bloc of the National Council boycotted the vote completely.

Perhaps the safest seat in the house went to President Iliyev's glamour-obsessed wife First Lady Mehriban Aliyeva, who ended up returning to office with 96.7% of votes.

Except that returning to office is a misnomer. Aliyeva has been an MP since 2005 but has rarely been seen in the legislature at her nominal place of work. No changes are expected.

According to the results announced by the Central Election Committee (CEC), New Azerbaijan did old Azerbaijan proud, securing 71 seats, while so-called independent parties and candidates — described by opposition parties outside the parliament as “fake opposition” — took the remaining seats.

The CIS observation mission — composed of representatives of other former Soviet states that also have problems holding free and fair elections — was satisfied with the outcome, noting the vote had been ‘organised well':

That is one way of describing the process. Another was coined by a local Twitter user:

[President Aliyev pictured] No! Stay home, we will fill [the ballots] out ourselves!

  • Ramil Iskandarli

    I think that CoE PACE Observation Mission has a precise report on Elections, which says that election day was calm and peaceful across the country. The voting process was observed to be adequate and generally in line with international standards. Voters had full and unimpeded access to polling stations and there were no incidents reported by the observers. It has nothing to do with “Caviar policy”, because, if it would work, OSCE would also observed elections and had the same observation report at PACE did. Selective approach to countries on human rights issues is the real reason of why international organizations (except CoE PACE) do not want to see any development in Azerbaijan.

  • Nihad

    The number of observers is not important for observing a democratic election. The most important thing is the created conditions, the satisfaction of the voters with the voting process and the opinion of the groups monitoring the election. Which is why OSCE/ODIHR’s refusal to observe the parliamentary election in Azerbaijan can’t cast shadow on the legitimacy of it.

  • Aqil Aliyev

    Observers from Italy, PACE satisfied the legitimacy of the elections. the refusal of the OSCE / ODIHR to observe parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan can not cast a shadow on the legitimacy of it.

  • Narmina Abbasova

    The voting process was observed by PACE to be adequate and generally in line with international standards. But if you blame Europe`s top HUMAN RIGHTS body in “caviar diplomacy”, then hey you have big big problems in Europe.

  • Gurban Gurbanov

    Not surprised with such a biased approach.

  • Rashid Mammedov

    The PACE has already given the true assessment to the elections in Azerbaijan.

  • Rubaba Abdulla Mammedova

    It was easy to predict even before the elections that such black campaigns against Azerbaijan will take place.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
Email Frequency

No thanks, show me the site