See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Netizens Think the Controversial Confucius Peace Prize Is Suspiciously Convenient for Chinese Authorities

Chinese president Xi Jinping welcomed Zimbabwe President Mugabe's visit in August 2014. Photo from Xinhua.

Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomed Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe during a visit in August 2014. Photo from Xinhua.

When Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe was awarded the Confucius Peace Prize in mid-September, human right activists, in particular those working in the African continent, scoffed at the idea of the word “peace” being associated with a leader regarded around the world as a dictator.

Some took the award as an attempt by China to use ancient Chinese thinker Confucius to justify their authoritarian governance model by associating a figure like Mugabe, who has been in power for 35 years.

The Chinese government, however, no longer has a part in the award, but despite authorities’ efforts, many netizens remained ignorant of the fact or skeptical.

The Confucius Peace Prize was initiated by a committee attached to the Association of Chinese Indigenous Arts under the supervision of the Chinese Ministry of Culture in 2010 after Liu Xiaobo, a Chinese dissident and democracy activist who remains in jail, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The first Confucius prize was awarded to Taiwan politician Lien Chan for his contribution to peaceful dialogue between mainland China and Taiwan.

In 2011, the prize committee was registered as an independent organization, the China International Peace Studies Center, in Hong Kong, and it awarded the prize to Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, igniting intense controversy.

For this year's award, Mugabe, 91, is reported to have prevailed against Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates and South Korean President Park Geun-hye. Qiao Wei, the president of the judging committee of the peace prize, said, “Mugabe is the founding leader of Zimbabwe and has been trying to stabilize the country’s political and economic order ever since the country was first founded. He brought benefit to the people of Zimbabwe.”

However, he rejected the prize, worth roughly US $80,000 dollars, after learning it has no official link to the Chinese government, according to Zimbabwean local media NewsDay.

Blurring the line with praise

Over the past decade, China has significantly expanded its investments in Africa, where it has been accused of cooperating with corrupt leaders at the expense of workers’ rights. Some observers theorized that the prize was a political gift — as revealed by the scandal surrounding Sam Pa, the most powerful middleman in China-Africa trade, the Hong Kong tycoon's businesses are associated with Chinese intelligence and state-owned companies. Pa was placed under US sanctions in 2014 for allegedly aiding Mugabe’s regime. In fact, Mugabe's family has a US $7.5 million extravagant villa in Hong Kong, and his daughter is now a student at City University.

Of course, all the above activities have no official association with the Chinese government, as both the Confucius Peace Prize and Pa's “Queensway” group are registered in Hong Kong.

While the Chinese government emphasizes that it has nothing to do with the prize, the Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece Global Times has been vocal in its praise of the Confucius Peace Prize, serving as the main media outlet to spread the news of the annual award. Hence, even mainland Chinese netizens are confused and believe that there is certain link between the prize and the party. Some have raised the question of why are all those authoritarian regimes and rogue governments supposed to be the “friends” of Chinese people?

‘Who is protecting the scammers?’

All the same, comments that are critical of the prize have been censored on Chinese social media. Rong Jian, a cultural expert, questioned the credibility of the prize by checking out the background of the committee:

第六届孔子和平奖授予津布巴韦总统穆加贝,原以为这是谁恶搞的笑话,没当回事,谁知居然是真的。看看这些评委都是谁吧,主席叫谯达摩,看这名字,谁知道他的来历?是从哪个江湖出来的?再看看这几个教授,谁认识他们?还有一个孔子艺术家得主,谁听说过这人?真是世界奇葩多,中国妖孽盛。

I had thought it could be a joke that Zimbabwe's President Mugabe was awarded the Confucius Peace Prize. But it’s real. Let’s look at these committee judges. Who knows the president, Qiao Damo, and his experiences? Who knows the other professors? And there even is a Confucius Art Prize recipient. How many oddities there are in China!

The relatively tame comment was scrubbed from Twitter-like platform Weibo. He raised a more critical question next:

这个孔子和平奖的山寨性质已被确证无疑,但奇怪的是,这样一个有辱国格的垃圾奖,几乎招致所有获奖者,包括今年获奖者穆加贝的拒领,却在中国堂而皇之的举办了六届;更奇怪的是,我前几天发帖揭露,转发量甚大,却两次被屏。究竟是谁在纵容和保护这些个江湖骗子呢?

The copycat nature of the Confucius Peace Prize is clear. What's strange is such a garbage award has insulted the country and almost all the award's recipients, including Mugabe, who has refused to take the award. But the award ceremony has been hosted in China for six years. What's ever stranger is that when I questioned the credibility of the prize, the post was deleted twice. Who is protecting the scammers?

Lingxu Puzi, a well-known online commentator, mocked the Mugabe's “contribution” to the world, and was also censored on Weibo:

中国人民的老朋友、津巴布韦总统穆加贝荣获2015“孔子和平奖”。他在位28年,津巴布韦元从他1980年上位时的1:1.5美元,到今年贬值为350000000亿元:1美元。人均寿命从1980年的61.22岁,下降至2006年男性37岁、女性34岁。其所作所为,是孔孟之道的反面典型。他惟一的贡献是,彻底解决了该国的养老问题。

Zimbabwe's President Mugabe, “the old friend of Chinese people”, won the 2015 Confucius Peace Prize. Since he won the election in 1980, the country’s currency has sharply devalued from 1:$1.5 in 1980 to 35000000 billion:$1 [in 2015], the average longevity has fallen from 61.22 years [life expectancy was 59.1 in 1980] to male 37 years and female 34 years in 2006. What he has done is just the opposite of the model of Confucianism. His only contribution is that he thoroughly solved the country’s pension problem.

‘They shine a light on each other’

On Twitter, overseas Chinese dissent He Qinglian believed the prize accurately reflected the authoritarian nature of the Chinese government:

China's Confucius Peace Prize was awarded to Zimbabwe's president, dictator Mugabe. The international community was shocked. The opposition party and human right activists found the award disgusting. Comment: It is consistent for the Chinese Communist Party to present the prize to Mugabe. Zimbabwe should have its own version of a peace prize and award it to Chinese President Xi Jinping. They shine a light on each other.

@MyDF pointed out that the communist party has a history of insulting the Confucius:

The last time the party insulted Confucius was in 1966, when the red guard blew up the tombs in the Confucius linage and dug up five corpses: the 75th generation Kong Xiangke and his wife, the 76th generation Kong Lingye and his wife and concubines. This time the insult is awarding the African dictator, butcher Mugabe with the Confucius Peace Prize.

Indeed, in the past two decades, the Chinese government has actively promoted Confucius to educate the world about the Chinese model, characterized by an emperor-like autocratic ruling party.

China has funded and set up nearly 500 Confucius Institutes in the world since 2004, mainly in the West, including the US, Canada and Britain. These institutes facilitate many foreign college students to study Chinese; however, the classes must avoid discussion of sensitive topics, such as dissidents, Tibet, the Tiananmen democratic protest, and the Falun Gong, a religious sect outlawed in China. China aims to build worldwide 1,000 Confucius Institutes by 2020.

Start the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site