Palpable hope swept across the continent  following the inauguration of Muhammadu Buhari as Nigeria’s president on May 29, 2015. President Buhari defeated the incumbent, Goodluck Jonathan.
Not only was this unusual, but the attendant concession of defeat by Goodluck was a new one in a continent saturated by sit-tight leaders . However, there is another element – albeit still untold – of this election: the social media story.
This will not be the first time social media played a part in Nigerian elections. The 2011 general elections bears an imprint of the power of social media in Nigerian politics. Goodluck Jonathan was the first Nigerian president to join Facebook; he wrote a book, “My Friends and I”; and also declared his intention to run for the presidency in 2011 on that same media. This, according to Nigerian journalist, Tolu Ogunlesi  lead to the faddification of Facebook in Nigerian politics:
President Jonathan took the shine off the IBB [Ibrahim Babangida ] presidential declaration in Abuja by choosing that morning to announce his own bid on Facebook . Ibrahim Babangida launched a YouTube campaign  video, and had an aide boast that he had become an avid Facebooker.
Similarly, one of the reasons attributed to the goodwill enjoyed by Muhammadu Buhari’s re-branding and eventual ascendancy to the presidency was propelled by his social media strategy. CNN journalist Lauren Said-Moorhouse  reported:
Social media has globally become one of the most important tools for candidates during election campaigns — and Nigeria's race was no exception. Cynthia Mbamalu, programs manager at Nigerian youth charity YIAGA, said platforms like Twitter and Facebook helped the Buhari campaign to reach population pockets that they could have otherwise missed.
“Social media provided the opportunity to connect with Nigerians, especially young people,” she explains. “For the first time in a long while there were tweets targeted mainly at promoting the person of General Buhari and the party's vision for Nigeria.”
It was, therefore, not surprising that President Buhari in his inaugural speech  acknowledged that “the Nigerian press is the most vibrant in Africa.” Also, his tacit gratitude to his supporters and critics on social media was not lost on observers: “My appeal to the media today – and this includes the social media – is to exercise its considerable powers with responsibility and patriotism.”
Social media propelled the political ‘war’
Twitter in Nigeria is a vibrant pool of conversation. This mirrors Nigerian society itself, which “is such a vibrant place that even the most mundane is crackling with energy.” Christian Purefoy , director of news and entertainment channel BattaBox, asserted in 2012, “With the explosion of mobile phones (and their video cameras!) and the coming of the internet – there are now the tools in the hands of every Nigerian to explore, share and make their voice heard.”
Twitter became a battleground for supporters of the two main presidential candidates, Buhari and Jonathan. The “war” was atrocious and divisive with each party dug in firmly in their respective trenches. Those who were indifferent watched keenly and later made up their minds.
However, a different conceptualization of political participation was conceived in Twitter Nigeria, namely “Fencism .” As I explained in a piece for The Scoop earlier this year:
Fencism is not neutralism! I have my political bias but I will not be bullied into displaying it on Twitter. Fencism is objectivism, realizing that both candidates have their flaws and not turning a blind eye – as many do – on them. Fencism is having the courage to tweet for and against any of the candidates. Not being held under the fanatical slavery of ‘my candidate better pass your candidate’. Fencism also means that I will vote on that day but will not waste my precious time only tweeting about the elections.
This stance was contentious as some Twitter users thought it was hypocritical and a cover-up for hiding entrenched political bias.
However, the war got real on the blogosphere as the election results were being collated. Tony Egbulefu reported:
Late in the evening on Saturday, March 28, Social Media users hit the net with the report that President Goodluck Jonathan had lost in the two Aso Rock polling units. The post went viral in an instant and buoyed hope in All Progressives Congress, (APC) supporters that such loss by the president within the perimeters of the seat of power could only be an indicator of matters that could go worse for him in the wider, far-flung political spaces. It turned out that the president won in Unit 021, which was located nearer to the seat of power with 293 votes against Buhari’s 263, while Buhari won in Unit 022, located in the outer reaches with 348 to 302. […]
No matter the perspectives, it is a hard fact that the social media proved handy in bringing anxious Nigerians up-to-speed with the voting outcomes. From Facebook alone, many became certain of the direction the wind would blow, well ahead of President Jonathan’s Tuesday evening concession of victory to Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, and Prof. Attahiru Jega’s early Wednesday morning election returns.
Propaganda and hate speech
Besides the campaign rants and mobilization that was present on the Nigerian blogosphere, this election also witnessed a cross pollination of news from social media to mainstream media. Since netizens offer more opportunities of immediacy, the Nigerian mainstream media had to play catch up many times.
However, the downside of this was that traditional media fell for unverified news that sprang from social media during the elections. It was a season of propaganda unlimited, Opeyemi Agbaje  opined:
This was one Nigerian election that was decided largely on account of propaganda and messaging! The [opposition] APC’s “change” message was compelling and the campaign stayed on message throughout the campaign. This effective message was complemented with devastating deployment of propaganda, often false or contrived but which most voters believed. President Jonathan’s and [the People's Democratic Party]’s communication machinery was in response hapless! A […] ruling party could be so completely incoherent in its communication that it soon became portrayed in the media (and sometimes in its own mindset) as a de facto opposition party. The election also marked the coming of age of social media as a critical force in Nigerian politics, for good or bad!
Emmanuel Onwubiko  gave a glimpse of the hate speech prevalent in Nigeria’s blogosphere during the elections:
It is regrettable that the popular social media platforms like FACEBOOK, TWITTERS, and INSTAGRAM among others have become potent weapons for near diabolical attacks targeted at political opponents as Nigeria prepares to hold one of the most contentious general elections in over five decades or indeed since after Nigeria gained her so -called flag independence from the British overlords in 1960. The 2015 General elections have been turned into a theatre of hate speeches and campaigns colored in a form that defies logic and common sense. Various politically motivated hate speeches about various candidates and especially the two leading Presidential candidates of All Progressives Congress and Peoples Democratic Party have been bandied. I am sure if experts should collate analyses of contents of the social media this year, Nigeria will rank tops because arguably more than 40 million young Nigerians who have since graduated and have no means of livelihood have found solace in the various social media platforms and are busy churning out divergent messages.
Nonetheless, the truth is that Nigeria’s social media ecosystem has undergone an amazing transformation over the years. Whether or not it evolves into a platform that propels or hinders change is a story for another day. What is obvious is that henceforth, no Nigerian politician can afford to run for a national election without sharpening his social media presence and/or engagement.