Just after a week of the April 25 Nepal earthquake , the hashtag #GoHomeIndianMedia  began trending on Twitter in India. While the Nepalis thanked  India for the immediate help offered after the earthquake, the Indian media has been criticised largely in Nepal for its insensitive reporting.
Some thought that the relief work has been used as a public-relations opportunity  for the Indian government.
— Shreeya Sinha (@ShreeyaSinha) May 5, 2015 
Others accuse the coverage itself of being insensitive and sensationalist. In one prominent example, an Indian reporter asks a Nepali mother  crying uncontrollably over her dead child’s body, “How does it feel—what are your emotions right now?”
An indian news reporter to a mother who's learnt her only son has been buried under their house. Q. How do you feel? #GoHomeIndianMedia 
— Prasanna KC (@KC_Prasanna) May 3, 2015 
Times Now reporter asks an injured woman did someone of yours die? She says my 10 year old daughter. He asks her the same thing 6 times ??
— Ratna Vishwanathan (@ratnadv) April 26, 2015 
Angered by the irresponsible reports in the Indian media, Nepalis online have started using the hashtag #GoHomeIndianMedia, which trended on Twitter for several days.
The anger has expanded beyond social media, as well. An autorickshaw was seen advertising the hashtag in streets of Kathmandu, for instance.
— Prakash Timalsina (@prakashujyalo) May 5, 2015 
Others say the Indian media has resorted to dirty gimmicks and showed a lack of basic humility in the earthquake's aftermath. This is not, incidentally, the first time India's reporters have faced such criticism. During the Uttarakhand flash floods , which killed over 5,000 people, some Indian media outlets saturated the airwaves with scenes  of extreme grief, depicting flood victims at very vulnerable moments, which some critics said was closer to disaster exploitation than news reporting.
Some Indians have signaled online that they are ashamed of their own media's behavior.
— Keerthivasan (@kvasan_c) May 4, 2015 
Other Indians have started using the hashtag #DontComeBackIndianMedia.
— SINGH (@Punjabi_AAPian) May 3, 2015 
For some, like Krittivas Mukherjee, who published an op-ed  in the Hindustan Times, much of the problem with Indian reporting in Nepal has to do with a “self-serving narrative” and “sense of condescension.”
Not everyone, of course, is eager to close the door on India's news media. Smita Sharma, a journalist based in New Delhi, wrote  on Dailyo.in that naysayers should take a moment to consider if they're seeing the bigger picture:
It is time for course correction before #GoHomeIndianMedia hashtags overshadow all the good work done by many journalists, who too are mortals, and brave challenges to tell the world stories of those in pain.
While some grievances might lose perspective, general concerns about the Indian media do raise questions about its sensitivity, or lack thereof, in disaster situations. India has more than 100 news channels, and they all compete with one another in a fierce pursuit of “target rating points “. Every news channel wants to be the first on the ground and with an exclusive  report. In the race to be first, especially during major disasters when so many people are tuning in, some media outlets fail to prioritize ethics and professional standards.
Others worry that networks are hiring too many amateurs, putting people in front of cameras before training them properly. Sunita Shakya, a writer of Nepalese origin, complained about this alleged trend in a blog post  for CNN, where she compared the Indian media's reporting to soap operas.
Natural disasters present enormous ratings opportunities to the news media, but they can also fundamentally challenge the integrity of the press. The Indian media's struggles in Nepal are a fresh reminder of the difficulties in responding to mass suffering.