The Release of South Africa's “Prime Evil”: It's Time to Confront The Evil of Apartheid

Nicknamed “Prime Evil”, Eugene de Kock was the commanding officer a counter-insurgency unit of the South African Police that kidnapped, tortured, and murdered numerous anti-apartheid activists during apartheid era. He was recently granted parole after serving 20 years of his 212 prison sentence.

Pierre de Vos reacts to his release by arguing that it is time to confront the evil of apartheid, not only of De Kock who defended it:

What De Kock did was monstrous – far more monstrous than anything an ordinary beneficiary of apartheid did. Whether he deserves to be granted parole is, therefore, at the very least, debatable. But singling out De Kock as particularly evil is also comforting for those of us who benefited from apartheid and continue to do so because of its lingering effects.

It’s an archetypal example of “Othering”. We pinpoint one wrongdoer (the torturer in the attic) in order to obscure our own complicity in upholding and benefiting from the system in whose name De Kock committed his crimes.

Supporting the prosecution and conviction of De Kock and his continued incarceration, and insisting on depicting him as uniquely evil, allow us to avoid having to confront the fact that the system itself was evil through and through.

It helps us white South Africans who lived through apartheid (or whose parents did) to retain the idea that we were, for the most part, “decent” people – lawyers, accountants, government clerks, railway workers, doctors, school teachers, insurance brokers – who read and discussed the merits of good books and movies with friends, who went to the opera and the symphony concert, who swooned over the yodelling Briels, who cried when that dog was killed in that children’s movie, who treated our servants with condescending kindness. In our own minds we would never, ever deliberately endorse cruelty and violence towards others.

Yet, we benefited from the system whose very raison d’être was to oppress and exploit others and to uphold and defend the sham superiority of whites and what is ironically termed “Western civilisation” – the same “civilisation” that produced Hitler, Stalin, Vietnam and Iraq, and embraced and benefited from slavery and colonial oppression.


  • Dianne Lang

    AND no one has stopped blaming apartheid for every sin of the country since the apartheid laws were abolished. We have just replaced them with 119 race based laws to limit the minority from the work place. The rationale for that is the minority deserve it. They also must pay back. It is also the time for the oppressor to feel oppressed. This is all nonsense. We cannot turn yesterday around. We can’t cure the past. You cannot recall a bullet. We can only stop racial discrimination, find compassion and work together, joined by a shared humanity, to make this a better land to live in. The past should not be forgotten – so that it is never, ever repeated. There is no excuse, even if it is the excuse that the minority must now be punished for what their parents and forefathers did, for discrimination of any kind.

  • Lynette Ackermann

    Fomenting hatred by going into a state of moral hysteria may just backfire on De Vos — his family may inadvertently become included in the 70,000 whites who have already been raped, tortured and murdered in the ongoing ethnic cleansing of the whites. And then he will blame Apartheid, of course. Can the poor man really not find anything more positive to talk about?

  • […] par Ndesanjo Macha · Traduit par Samy Boutayeb · Voir l’article d’origine [en] · commentaires (0) Partager: twitter facebook reddit […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.