China has once again been hit by a violent attack targeting its civilians, prompting authorities to announce a crackdown on terrorism activities. More than 200 suspects have been arrested.
But for some, that isn't enough. Following the latest tragedy, some web users in China advocated for the collective punishment of terrorists’ families and associates to deter further attacks.
On Thursday, 22 May 2014, two vehicles drove through an open-air market and threw explosives in Urumqi, the capital of the western Chinese region of Xinjiang. Thirty-nine people were killed and around 90 people were injured, according to state media.
The police identified five suspects responsible for the attack, who all belong to the ethnic Muslim minority the Uighurs. The next day, Chinese authorities announced the launch of a yearlong crackdown on violent terrorist activities. President Xi Jinping called for the terrorists behind the attack to be “severely” punished.
Xinjiang has experienced a spate of attacks in recent years, with at least two happening in Urumqi. On 30 April 2014, a bomb hit the South Railway station of Urumqi, killing three people and wounding 79 others.
Since ethnic riots broke out in July 2009, leaving at least 197 people dead in Urumqi, violent attacks have begun to rise in frequency.
Chinese authorities put the blame on the Uighur separatists, including the attacks at railway stations in Kunming in March 2014 that killed 29, and have already stepped up security measures in Xinjiang. According to state media, more than 200 people were arrested and 23 extremist groups have been broken up this month. According to Xinhua agency, “many of the suspects were in their 20s and 30s and watched terror videos online to learn how to make explosives and other physical training.
China’s online community lamented the latest violence while also discussing the necessary punishments. In recent days, the “lianzuo” system (collective punishment) became the trending topic on Weibo. Lianzuo is an ancient tactic of Chinese governments. By putting several households into one unit, if any member of that unit commits a crime, all members of that unit would be subject to punishment. The word lianzuo, thus, reminds people of a form of authoritarianism that builds upon terror.
Wu Bihu (@吴必虎), a professor of tourism at Peking University, first brought up the issue and immediately heated up the discussion on popular microblogging site Sina Weibo:
Very few Islam extremists and terrorists are severely deteriorating the living standards of the Uighurs. I support some netizens’ opinion that it is very difficult to prevent and eradicate terrorism. They are not afraid of death, what can be done? Lianzou. Their families, their neighbors, and the monks at the Muslim temples should be collectively punished. Because they should be responsible for monitoring the terrorists. Civilization has to be achieved through barbarism.
Although he later apologized for his misuse of the word “lianzuo” and deleted the original Weibo post, many other netizens responded.
Famous critic and writer Lian Yue (@连岳) replied:
It’s given that the killers must pay for their crimes. And it’s hypocritical to advocate forgiveness for the terrorist. But to advocate for “lianzuo”, to depend on killing the innocent to crack down on terrorism, is like saving the fire with oil, which is even worse than the hypocrisy.
User @lalunazhan suggested that “lianzuo” should be first applied to another sever issue – corruption:
If lianzuo is applied to counter-terrorism, I suggest that we should begin it with anti-corruption. The embezzler’s family members, the promoted subordinates, and his direct superiors shall all be punished.
In contrast, those who live in Xinjiang are more likely to support the ‘lianzuo” system. Qian Quiren (@千求人) said:
Those who didn’t suffer the terrorism have no say in the matter. “Lianzuo” is the anti-terrorism experience that has been proved to be effective, learning from Russia and Putin. Why bother to criticize it? Come and live in Xinjiang for several years and then speak.
Another user, “@n919″ (@优雅的诗意), who also lives in Xinjiang, echoed Professor Su’s “lianzuo” policy:
Professors “lianzuo” policy is not impossible. Uighurs in Xinjiang have less awareness of the law, but they are big about their family. Everyone is responsible for the behavior of other family members.
Compared with the overwhelming anger, sadness and blessings that swept social media after the Kunming attack in March, the latest attack received less attention from netizens throughout China than from the Han Chinese who are living or used to live in Xinjiang.
The Xinjiang autonomous region is located in China's far west and is home to 8 million Han Chinese and 10 million Uighurs. Most Uighurs are Muslim and Islam is an important part of their life, culture and identity. The tension between Han Chinese and Uighurs has escalated in recent years, with the target of attacks shifting to civilians.
of course they should be punished too….
I only hope you’re joking. People who really believe their families/associates should be punished should themselves be thrown into the sun for being excessively stupid. Way to hunt witches, people.
should change the name for it to be more pc, just like MAD (mutualy assusured destruction) is not about nuking the hell out of your enemy its about deterrence, collective punishement is not about punishement “collective deterrence” would be a better name for it. exemple: i got 2 daughters getting into uni , my nephew spend 8hours a day in a moske and talks about jihad all the time, with no collective deterrence its not my problem, nephew blows up a subway station. with collective deterrence me my wife and my daughter might get hanged if he does some terrorist act, well then that uncle will very much try to reason him , call the authorities, or nephew might accidently fall from the 10th storey of the highest building in town for mysterious reasons.
we dont live in a perfect world and most people around are not “good” incentives are required for people to be good and facing up to psychopathic familly member is life threatning so it requires life threatning incentive