See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Uncle Sam's Ukraine Failure in Russia

America's shortcomings in the information war over Ukraine. Images mixed by author.

America's shortcomings in the information war over Ukraine. Images mixed by author.

Tensions are high in eastern Ukraine, where the first bullets are flying in what could become a major armed conflict. The violence might be only starting, but an information war between Russia and the West has raged for months now. Clearly frustrated with Moscow’s actions in eastern Ukraine, the US State Department openly denounced Russian propaganda yesterday, April 13, 2014, listing ten “false claims about Ukraine” by the Kremlin. The American government published a similar list last month, on March 4, criticizing Russian claims about Crimea.

The biggest audience for “the Russian propaganda machine,” as the State Department calls it, is undoubtedly Russia's own population. US officials showed little interest in appealing to Russian speakers, however, publishing both lists in English only. There appears to be no official Russian translation of the press release, though several media outlets have summarized the text in Russian and Ukrainian. The US Russian embassy’s official Twitter account, which has over 21 thousand followers, did post a link to the “ten false claims,” though just 15 people retweeted it.

Unsurprisingly, given the document’s unavailability in Russian, the State Department’s myth-busting announcement got little reaction from Russians. While Russian newspapers’ summaries about the US press release have attracted some reposts on Twitter and other online networks, most original feedback from Russian bloggers is decidedly negative. Many objections focus on the State Department’s implication that “Russian agents” are active in Ukraine. In what has become a familiar practice in the dispute about combatants’ origins, bloggers endlessly dissect photographs of the armed men in Ukrainian cities, debating whether someone’s rifle, vest, helmet, or who-knows-what-else reveals his true identity.

Of the Russian Internet users who reject the State Department’s comments, most seem content not to engage the report’s content at all, instead hurling abuse at the US government in general terms. “The enemy has an amazing talent [for lying],” wrote someone on LiveJournal. “How’s the State Department’s head so full of shit?” asked a Facebook user. “They lie with every breath,” another person wrote, adding, “At least our guys [in the Russian government] just keep quiet, but these people [the Americans] lie.” One blogger on LiveJournal commented on the State Department’s press release by arguing that the evidence of Russian involvement in Ukraine is minimal, compared to the (supposed) mountains of data that show the United States’ responsibility for a spike in Afghan opium production. For that reason, he claims, “sanctions against the USA make far more sense than another round of penalizing Russia.”

The US government’s recent outreach to Russian speakers about the events in Ukraine has been clumsy, to say the least. On April 8, 2014, the US embassy in Russia tweeted a link to a news story on Echo of Moscow’s website about separatists in Kharkov confusing an opera house for the mayor’s building. (The mistake, the report claims, reveals that the men were not locals, which implies outside intervention.) The embassy added to its tweet a hashtag that was supposed to say “the isolation of Russia,” but it misspelled the word “Russia.” Astonishingly, no one has deleted the tweet. (It is still online and available today). Within hours, Russia’s Foreign Ministry posted on Facebook a photograph of the misspelling, mocking the error and offering language assistance with any future “propaganda materials.”

Up to the present, votes in international institutions about the annexation of Crimea suggest that countries are likelier to sympathize with Ukraine and the United States than with Russia. As far as ordinary Russians are concerned, however, the Americans are waging a lousy information war.

8 comments

  • S Ennis

    The “Rosii” thing is reminiscent of the “peregruzka” fiasco, but it’s all beside the point in any case. Russians are in love with their own TV propaganda and are not that interested in hearing anything different – let alone from the State Department. What Kiselev and Co tell them is their “pravda” irrespective of whether it is true or not.

    • navre12

      They sound like our Fox News here in America; They never seem to promote the truth about our government either.

  • Will Stevens

    You might want to check out the State Department’s Twitter acct @UkrProgress, where weare pushing back on Russian propaganda in Russian.

    • Kevin Rothrock

      Thank you, Will. I should have addressed UkrProgress in this piece.

  • Uncle Sam may be busy fighting Russian propaganda, but what would President Lincoln say about the Ukraine crisis? Checkout http://accidentalrevolutionist.blogspot.com/ for an opinion on how Ukraine compares with the American civil war.

  • […] Uncle Sam’s Ukraine Failure in Russia […]

  • […] anders lautenden Behauptungen, Russland sehr stark. Aber dieses diplomatische Geplänkel im Moment verlieren wir im ganz großen Stil, weil wir uns ganz schön dämlich anstellen. Da hat Putin mit der Gaswaffen-Geschichte in Syrien […]

  • […] wäre mal eine willkommene Abwechslung von den ungeschickten Versuchen der US Diplomatie, mit ganz normalen Russen in Kontakt zu kommen [Global Voices Bericht auf Englisch]. Aber im vorliegenden Fall sind die russischen […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site