Arbitrary TV License Decision Undermines Hong Kong Freedom of Speech

Two new free-to-air television licenses were issued on 15 October 2013 to PCCW Ltd and I-Cable Communications Ltd. The decision should have been seen as a big step to opening up the monopolized local television market, yet the screening out of Hong Kong Television Network (HKTV), regarded as the most promising new competitor by the public, encourages people to believe that the Beijing government is operating behind the scenes.

As PCCW and I-Cable are existing paid-TV operators, the government's decision has not changed the monopoly nature of local media ecology – the most important public demand reflected in a consultation in 2009 carried out by the Broadcasting Authority. Frustrated by news, some netizens created a page, Support Hong Kong Television, and within two days, more than 437 thousand people have joined.

Facebook Group, Support HKTV called for a protest on October 20. Protest poster said: I want TV box, not black box.

Facebook Group, Support HKTV called for a protest on October 20. Protest poster said: I want TV box, not black box.

Monopoly of the TV market

As a global city, Hong Kong only has two free-to-air television companies and one of them, the Television Broadcasts Limited has monopolized the market for more than 40 years. For more than two decades since the early 1990s, the civil society has been demanding that the government issue more free-to-air TV licenses to new competitors. But so far it just issued one cable TV permit (operated by I-Cable) in 1993 and a broadband TV permit (operated by PCCW) in 2003. Both are paid services.

In response to the 2009 public consultation on the local media environment, the Broadcasting Authority called for public application of new free-to-air TV licenses and reviewed three applications in 2010. The Authority then suggested that the Government Executive Council issue three new permits in 2011. Since then the three applicants, in particular the HKTV, have been preparing to enter the market and the local people are full of expectation. However, the government eventually screened off the only new competitor, HKTV, from entering the TV market without giving any concrete explanation.

320 workers dismissed

Soon after the result was released, the entrepreneur behind HKTV, Ricky Wong, revealed in a press conference that he received an invitation to make the application back in 2010 and the high-level government source was very optimistic that he would get a license. To prepare for the venture, he sold City Telecom in 2012 and so far ahs invested more than one billion HK dollars to prepare for HKTV. Soon after the government announced the result, HKTV was forced to dismiss 320 workers. A drama director from HKTV, So Man Chong, expressed his frustration towards the Hong Kong government in an interview [zh] with the House News, an online blog portal in Hong Kong:


Our production team spent up to two year time [to produce one drama], our production is more professional than Hollywood. We devoted our heart [to prepare for the new TV station]. But the whole plan was screwed without giving any reason. So frustrated. I don't feel regret (for joining HKTV); The fault does not lie with HKTV and Mr. Wong. It is the government's responsibility. I am so disappointed with the government. I didn't want to join the Occupy Central in the first place, now I want to.

Another junior script writer, Chong Yuen Ping, shared [zh] in Facebook:


Operating a TV station from ground zero is very risky. The reason why we can still cling on is that we believe Hong Kong people demand better quality TV drama. The content should be more in touch with reality (ordinary families won't be living in 1000 square feet apartments). Use real life settings and don't avoid political topics. We want to speak for people and react to social concerns.


Yesterday all our dreams shattered, hidden among the political overtones, the interests of those in power trying to hide something. The decision has denied all our efforts. This morning the company announced plans to cut more than half of its employees. When Wong entered the room, we all clapped because we know that the decision is very heavy for him. Someone asked if he knows what is the reason behind the permit, he said the only reason is the unspeakable reason. Everyone knows what is the reason!

Political screen out

According to a leaked consultation document revealed by local newspaper Apple Daily [zh], HKTV was ranked number 2 in term of competitiveness and major government officials were supportive of the decision to issue three new licenses. Yet the recommendation from the government administration was over-ruled in the Executive Council. Many believe that the decision is political in nature and the final decision was made by the Beijing government.

Lam Shiu Bun pointed out [zh] that all media tycoons in Hong Kong have to win the trust of the Beijing government. Although Ricky Wong is a successful businessman, Beijing government may feel threatened by his management style:


Although Ricky Wong was appointed as CPPCC member of the Zhejiang province between 2008 and 2013 and has a pro-China outlook, it is difficult to predict the “magic boy” [Wong's nickname in the business field]. Back in 2008, he acted as the CEO of Asia Television [two of the current free-to-air television stations, Beijing mouthpieces in Hong Kong]. Back then, he stressed that ATV should not depend on mainland China and should not become another Central China Television channel. He also pointed out pro-communist TV does not have the market and people like anti-communist opinion. He had pissed off the red capital [mainland Chinese capital]. There are also rumors that Ricky Wong is familiar with Jimmy Lai [an anti-CCP media tycoon in Hong Kong] and that the future free-to-air TV would become an anti-CCP machine.

Many civic groups have spoken out against the government's decision. The Hong Kong Journalist Association issued a statement [zh] demanding that the government reveal the decision making process in detail. The Chinese University School of Journalism and Communication also issued a statement, believing the decision will eventually bring adverse effects for free speech in Hong Kong as the government can control the media organization by its arbitrary decision making process:

今次事件,造成極壞先例。發牌制度決策不透明, 將令有意加入廣播行業的經營者卻步。現正營運並有意續牌的廣播機構,也將要面對不明朗的處境。長遠來說,會影響本港的資訊和言論自由。

The incident has set an extremely bad example. The decision lacks transparency and will discourage future competitors from joining the broadcasting industry. Even for the existing operators, they have to face unpredictable circumstances when they renew their licenses in the future. In the long term, it will affect Hong Kong's information and freedom of expression.

The Support HKTV Facebook group has decided to launch a protest against the decision on October 20.

Start the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.