The Chinese Communist Party is launching a year-long campaign to clean up the party to do away with corrupt elements in its organization, state-run news agency Xinhua recently reported.
But many Chinese netizens have expressed skepticism toward the campaign, arguing that democracy with the open participation of the people, and not a closed internal process, is the best way to get rid of corruption.
In a high-level party meeting on June 18, 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping explained the slogan of the party's clean-up campaign: “Look in the mirror, tidy yourself up, wash your body, and treat the illness” (照镜子、正衣冠、洗洗澡、治治病):
Look in the mirror is to reflect upon the working style. Make yourself clean and disciplined. Find out the differences [between you and the people] and thus the direction. Tidy yourself up is to keep yourself straight according to the morality and discipline of the party. Wash your body is to engage in self-criticism and reflection in alignment with the campaign spirit. Treat the illness is to punish those party members who are corrupted so as to save the patient [the party].
However, this is not the first time the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] has expressed a determination to fight internal corruption. There have been at least four major party clean-up campaigns and numerous smaller-scale ones in CCP history.
The first clean-up was conducted in 1942 before the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC). The main purpose of the campaign was to consolidate the leadership of the CCP under Mao Zedong. A large number of CCP members were labelled as “anti-revolutionary”, “traitors” or even “spies”. The political slogan at that time was also “self-criticism” and “treat the illness”.
The second clean-up [zh] against party bureaucracy and corruption happened soon after the establishment of the People's Republic of China. About 320,000 CCP members was dismissed, but more than one million new members was recruited.
The third party clean-up campaign happened between 1957 and 1959 against rightists, who criticized the Soviet collectivism model, namely the ideologies of Leninism and Marxist-Leninism. and thus created a potential threat against the one-party dictatorship. Around 550,000 intellectuals were prosecuted and many of them died before the vindication in 1977 marking the end of the Cultural Revolution.
The most recent party clean-up was launched by Deng Xiaoping, the engineer of China's economic reform between 1983 and 1987 to eradicate the supporters of the Gang of Four, a controlling political faction during the Cultural Revolution led by Mao Zedong's last wife that eventually fell out of favor, and prepare for the the country's Open Door policy.
Against such historical background, people's responses towards the announcement of a new clean-up effort were rather skeptical. Many stated that democracy is the key to a successful and thorough clean-up of party corruption.
“Ma Ning's Weibo 2013″ (马宁的微博2013) is a CCP member and has been through three clean-up campaigns since he joined the party. He wrote on popular Chinese microblogging platform Sina Weibo:
掐指一算，自我入党以来，已经历了三次整风 […] 每次都讲党风关系到生死存亡，危机意识不可谓不强。但是党风依旧不佳，廉政依旧遥远。根本问题不解决，恐怕就不会有什么结果。
Since I have entered the party, I have been through three clean-up campaigns so far. […] Every time, it's the same old story that party morality is a matter of life and death. But so far nothing has changed and we are far from being clean. If you don't touch the fundamental problem, there won't be any results.
Wen Jinrang (汶金让), a law professional, believed that the campaign has to include people's participation:
Without involving ordinary people to criticize and educate the officials, the campaign will never achieve the purpose of clean-up, self-improvement, self-reform. The officials are so cunning these days, they will never reflect and correct their behaviors.
@Song Zude: [party clean-up is good, just worried that it remains at the ideological level] They have identified the problem and want to solve it. However, who should be responsible for the clean-up? Those who are in high ranking positions are usually more corrupt, so how can they be responsible for cleaning up the low ranking officials? Moreover, all of them have embedded interests and entangling relationships. The slogan can't achieve anything without people's participation. Give them the vote and the corruption will vanish.
@”Jilin investigative reporter”: We have been through the “Three Talks” (Campaign to Talk about education, politics and morality in 1995) and “Three Represents” (in 2002), all of these are just ideological campaigns. The key of the campaign should be people's participation. We are now dealing with a group of corrupt party leaders and officials who have no responsibility and pay no respect to people. Only by giving people votes can the problem be addressed.
Apart from giving people the right to vote, many, like “Hello to God” (问候上帝—), pointed out that the party should allow dissent in order to monitor officials:
@”Hello to God” A new wave of clean-up has begun and it is necessary to correct the four major misbehaviors of officials. There are two possible explanations for the lack of opposition voices within the ruling party: 1. All the decisions are correct; 2. It is a dictatorship. Thus, the leader should allow opposition view and this is the only way for democracy.
@”My country is so sick”: Without law, the clean-up will turn into political prosecution.
@”Commercial world — wise and strong” : What is clean-up? Reform?? It sounds as if they know nothing about law. What does it mean for rule of law in this clean-up campaign? And what is the role of our judiciary in the campaign?