Snowden Hides in Hong Kong, US-China Diplomacy Takes Center Stage · Global Voices
Owen Guo

It's like a Hollywood movie: a former CIA worker leaks top-secret documents and seeks refuge on enemy soil, only to drop out of public view as the scandal heats up.
Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old American tech specialist, recently revealed himself as the whistleblower who leaked details of far-reaching telephone and Internet monitoring by the US government. Snowden was in hiding for about three weeks at a Hong Kong hotel before he reportedly checked out on June 10, 2013. He is still believed to be in Hongkong but his exact whereabouts remain unclear.
The explosive revelations by Snowden coincided with Chinese President Xijinping's two-day US visit to build rapport with President Obama. Before Xi left Beijing, media speculated that the US would pressure China on the cyber espionage issue that has vexed the two nations for months. The US said China has repeatedly committed cyber espionage that targets American companies and government agencies, a charge China has resolutely denied.
The saga might help Beijing score political points, an expert was quoted by The Wall Street Journal as saying. In the meantime, media frenzy surrounding Snowden has created a wave of nationalism in the blogosphere in China, with many netizens seeing US government's vast snooping as a chance to strike back.
Edward Snowden, who leaked US surveillance programs, talked to Guardian newspaper. Screen grab from Youku
Yang Rui, anchor on the English channel of China’s national broadcaster CCTV, commented on the popular microblogging service Sina Weibo:
中国政府咋办？一位年轻有良知的美国人需要帮助！BBC披露：前中情局雇员Snowden 说美政府可随意监听千万计的世界任何人的电话，监看任何人的电子邮件，美国NSA国家安全署可以进入九大网络公司服务器如脸谱，谷歌和雅虎。目前29岁的 Snowden滞留香港，他面临被引渡回国。美指责中国搞IP偷窃，它自己呢？
What should the Chinese government do? A young and conscientious American needs help! According to BBC: Former CIA employee said the US government can monitor at will millions of phone calls and emails anywhere in the world, NSA can access servers of nine Internet companies like Facebook, Google and Yahoo. The 29-year-old Snowden now remains in Hong Kong, he faces potential extradition. The United States accuses China of IP theft, what about the US itself?
Zhang Jiang, a journalism professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University, wrote on his Weibo account:
Edward Snowden的举动不止于载入新闻史，他以公开身份揭露美国官方应该增加了自己的安全系数。美国政府即便以“反恐”为由，也不能如此监控大量公民电话和电邮通信，其他国家也要引以为戒。
What Edward Snowden has done will go down the history of journalism, his coming forward in revealing what the US government [has done] should make him safer. Even under the name of anti-terrorism, the US government is not in a position to launch large-scale monitoring of citizens’ phone calls and emails, other countries should take this as a lesson.
Fan Haitao, a Chinese student at Columbia University in the US, summed up the divided nature of the debate:
美国人Edward Snowden目前跳出公然揭秘美国政府对电话、网络和电子邮件的监控目前让政府又处在“是否违宪”的风口浪尖。看了电视新闻，主要观点分为两派。国会议员认为政府监控没有问题，有法庭的监视并且监控的电话只出现时间没有名字。但是另一边观点认为，即便是监控也应该举办听证会，让公众决定。
US citizen Edward Snowden has made revelations that the US government has monitored phone calls, Internet and emails, the government is now facing a firestorm of constitutional violation criticism. After watching the news on TV, I found there are two factions. Members of Congress believe it’s fine for the government to undertake surveillance, it is overseen by the court and besides, the phone calls monitored contain time and duration, not names. Another faction claims that hearings should be held concerning the surveillance, so the public could decide.
Outspoken scholar Wu Zuolai came to US's defense:
有些国家用于反恐怖，有些国家用于侵犯人权，民主国家，公共信息很难用于造恶，专制国家，窃听公众信息是为了更好的专制。
Some countries use [surveillance] to counter terrorism, other countries use it to violate human rights, public information in democratic countries is rarely used to do bad things, authoritarian states instead use it to seek better authoritarianism.
Others, like Ahua de Yisaka Dao, questioned why Snowden would end up in Hong Kong:
我俩讨论了很久Edward Snowden的事情，这真是堪比大片的情节，觉得他选择来香港太诡异了，难道他真的不知道香港早已不是真正的自由港，而是被中共控制的吗？向来只有中国人去美国申请政治避难，要是现在来一个美国人向中国政府申请政治避难，这件事就精彩了。。。。
We two discussed the case of Edward Snowden extensively, this is like plot from a blockbuster! I think it was very weird that he came to Hong Kong, didn't he know that Hong Kong is no longer a free Hong Kong, instead it is controlled by the Communist Party of China? We've only heard about Chinese seeking political asylum in the US, it would be interesting if an American sought political asylum from the Chinese government….
Lvqiu Luwei, a well-known TV journalist who has 2.7 million followers on Weibo, wrote:
对Snowden来说，香港安全吗？如果在港申请政治庇护，会有漫长的审查时间，这段时间内，申请人可以合法居留，但是不能工作。媒体都在找他，千辛万苦找到一家酒店，结果被告知，一个叫这个名字的人今天退房了。去哪儿了？重庆大厦吃咖喱？
For Snowden, is it really safe for him to be in Hong Kong? If he sought political asylum here, he will have to wait a long time for necessary procedures, within this time, he could stay legally, but couldn't work. Media were all looking for him, they finally found the hotel [he stayed], but were informed that a person with this name had checked out. Where has he gone? Would he be eating curry in Chongqing mansion?
The Guardian and The Washington Post broke the story of US government spying programs on June 6, 2013 without naming him as the source, but Snowden later outed himself as the person behind the leaks. In a video interview published online, Snowden said he had chosen to flee to Hong Kong due to its “commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent”.
Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to Chinese rule in 1997. Under the extradition treaty the island city has with the US, Snowden still risks being sent back and prosecuted. The Chinese government has yet to officially comment on his case because of a three-day holiday.
However, Chinese media outlets have picked up the juicy story, filtering out Snowden's reference to Hong Kong as a place of “free speech”. In mainland China, Internet censorship is commonplace, and legions of the so-called Internet police are tasked to monitor politically edgy content.
So it's no surprise that while many Chinese netizens praise Snowden, some say he fled to the wrong place, implying that Beijing's heavy-handed policies are exerting increasing control over Hong Kong.
Former China Google head, Kaifu Lee, applauded Snowden on Weibo:
观看了Snowden的采访后（http://t.cn/zHT8ZsQ），我佩服他的原则性和价值观，鄙视美国Prism计划。但是他确实触犯了美国法律（泄露国家机密）。所以最合适的结局可能就是得到政治庇护了（冰岛？）。
After watching the interivew of Snowden, I admire his principles and values and I despise Prism programs of the States. But he did violate US laws( leaking State secret). So the best result probably is that he get political asylum( Iceland?).
One netizen named Fengmao Lingjiao wrote:
选错了地方。在一个人性价值观沦落的地方寻求庇护，其结果就是被当作筹码出售。大陆是BOSS，BOSS是无节操的原始商人，有杀戮与买卖的传统。兔死狗烹，鸟尽弓藏的“交易理念”，一直在被执行：曾经的地主，曾经的右派。。
[He] picked the wrong place. To seek asylum in a place where humanity is declining and value being eroded, the result would only be that [he] would be used as a tool. Mainland is the boss, boss is a barbarian businessman without morals, it has traditions of slaughter and [dirty] dealings. The philosophy of “kicking out someone after service is complete” has prevailed: [The government] was once the landlord and rightist.