Brazil: Will the Pioneering Internet Bill of Rights Pass?

The Marco Civil, a ‘bill of rights for Internet’ users in Brazil, will come to a vote on August 8, 2012. While the majority seems to support the approval of the law, some are against the broad freedom that the initiative will bring.

Since October 29, 2009, the Bureau of Legislative Affairs of the Brazilian Ministry of Justice (SAL/MI), in partnership with Rio de Janeiro's Law School (DIREITO RIO) from Getulio Vargas Foundation, has been working on the collaborative creation of Marco Civil da Internet (Civil Regulatory Framework for the Internet) [pt].

The document has been created through public consultation. The population was encouraged to participate giving opinions and commentary through an online platform [pt]. As a result, several changes have been made to the original text, eventually passing through the Civil House and making it to the Chamber in 2012. Unlike Internet-related laws addressing piracy or copyright infringement, the Marco Civil is not a criminal law, but a civil one.

In an article written by Ellery Biddle for Global Voices Advocacy, she contextualizes the implications behind the bill, as well as the process followed for its creation. This same process places Brazil in a pioneering position in digital policy and may well serve as a model for many other countries.

Infografia sobre o voto dos cidadãos online no Marco Civil, por Vote na Web.

Infographic on online citizen's vote on the Bill of Rights, by Vote na Web.

With such wide participation from the population, it was also expected that some would criticize and some would support the initiative. Many entities are in favour of the final version of the Bill of Rights. In a recent statement, Brazil's Internet Society (ISOC Brasil) [pt], a chapter fully recognized by the Internet Society (ISOC) [pt] declared its support to the approval of the proposal. The Comitê Gestor da Internet (CGI, Internet Manager Committee) [pt] also declared support [pt], stating:

Resolve tornar público seu amplo apoio ao parecer final do relator da Comissão Especial na Câmara dos Deputados, Deputado Federal Alessandro Molon, congratulando-o pelas alterações esclarecedoras e aprimoramentos precisos que promoveu no texto do projeto de lei (…)

Decided to make public its broad support for the final opinion of the Special Rapporteur of the House of Representatives, Congressman Alessandro Molon, congratulating him for the clarifying changes and precise enhancements that promoted in the text of the bill (…)

Several campaigns in support were created, and after the 2nd Internet Forum, which took place in the city of Olinda, in Recife, early July, participants decided to create a petition [pt] in support of the bill of rights. The intention was to get the most number of signatures as possible.

Netizens also commented on Twitter under the hashtag #marcocivil.

The Pirate Party (@partidopirataBR), a profile that defends access to information, sharing of knowledge and privacy rights, started a campaign urging MP's support in the approval of the project.

@luiza_erundina Deputada, contamos com sua presença e apoio à aprovação do relatório do #MarcoCivil na próxima semana!

@luiza_erundina MP, we count on your presence and support to the approval of the #MarcoCivil report next week!

Some politicians also showed support. In a video published by the Frente Parlamentar da Cultura, Federal MP from Paraná João Arruda describes Marco Civil as “the best law in the world concerned with the Internet”.

Yes vs. No

Despite such support, the bill still divides opinions. While the majority seems to support passing of the bill, some position themselves against it, because of the broad freedom that Marco Civil brings to the Internet.

According to the law, service providers (such as Youtube and Facebook) would not have any responsibility over the content being uploaded by their users, and wouldn't be able to remove content – even if offensive – without a warrant, because such attitude is seen as a violation of freedom of expression. Professor Marcelo Thompson, from the University of Hong Kong, explains:

If the online service provider knows with certainty it is hosting content crudely offensive to someone’s privacy, sexual orientation, children’s rights, you name it, and does nothing about it — actually, even if the provider explicitly acknowledges the offensive nature of the content, even if it acts out of sheer cruelty in leaving things as they stand –, its conduct will not carry any liability whatsoever.

Word tree do texto inicial e dos comentários do marco civil, criado por Transparência Hackday / Esfera para o Observatório do Marco Civil.

Word tree of the original text and comments on the bill of rights, created by Transparência Hackday / Esfera for Observatório do Marco Civil.

In an interview [pt] for the iPNews website, the president of the Comissão de Direito Eletrônico e Crimes de Alta Tecnologia (Committee of Electronic Rights and High-Technology Crimes) from OAB/SP, Coriliano Almeida Camargo, stated why he is against Marco Civil:

o projeto viola direitos de segurança, resposta e vedação de anonimato e defende a isenção de responsabilidade por parte de provedores, contrária a decisão do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), e para a Fecomercio-SP (Federação do Comércio de Bens, Serviços, Turismo  do Estado de São Paulo), a medida pode fazer da internet uma “terra sem lei”, pois se o Marco Civil for aprovado pode representar perigo para segurança de usuários da web.

the project violates the rights of security and response, [the prohibition*] of anonymity and defends the exemption of liability for providers [which is] against the decision of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), and the SP-Fecomercio (Federation of Trade in Goods, Services, Tourism of the State of São Paulo), the measure can make the Internet a “lawless land”, as if the Civil Marco is approved it may endanger security of web users. [*Translator's note: The Constitution of Brazil establishes that the expression of thought is free, anonymity being forbidden.]

On Twitter, Mario Marino (@gigantopitecus) also said why he opposes [pt] the bill:

O #MarcoCivil ao isentar o provedor da responsabilidade objetiva trata de derrogar a obrigação do Estado prover instrumento de identificação.

The #MarcoCivil, by exempting the provider of strict liability comes to waive the state's obligation to provide tools for identification.

The Blog MegaNão, an initiative against internet surveillance, reports [pt]  on several entities pressuring against the approval of Marco Civil:

As empresas de Telecomunicações e a indústria do Copyright estão fazendo forte lobby na Câmara dos Deputados para segurar o Marco Civil da Internet, esta pressão ainda conta com o apoio do Ministério das Comunicações. Os oponentes do Marco Civil já anunciaram abertamente que farão de tudo para atrasar a votação e que não concordam que a neutralidade da rede faça parte do Marco Civil.

Telecommunications companies and Copyright industry are strongly lobbying the Chamber of Representatives to put a hold on the Internet Bill of Rights; this pressure still counts on the support of the Ministry of Communications. Opponents of the Bill of Rights have openly announced that they will do anything to delay the vote and that they do not agree that net neutrality should be included in the Bill of Rights.

The vote is scheduled for August 8. The last voting day was expected to take place on June 11, but ended up being cancelled due to lack of quorum. Whatever the result, once again, Brazil has the chance to create new paths in the digital arena.


Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.