Israel: Defense Budget Vs. Social Justice

This post is part of our International Relations & Security coverage.

One of the major results of the social justice protests in Israel in the last year has been a renewed debate about the budgetary priorities of the state. The social justice movement (also known as #j14) demanded a more equal distribution of wealth in Israel, including funneling a greater share of the budget to welfare services for the population such as subsidizes housing, free education, and better medical services, at the expense of current budgetary priorities – namely, the defense budget which always keeps rising.

Blogger Tomer Israeli [he] explained the logic shared by many #j14 protesters:

רק אם נוכל להקטין באמת נתח זה נוכל להגדיל במקומות אחרים. אחרת נמשיך להסתובב סביב הזנב של עצמנו ונמשיך למשוך מצד לצד את השמיכה הקצרה. האם יש לנו דעה בנוגע לתקציב? כי אם אין לנו דעה הרי שאין לנו כיוון משמעותי ודרך לשינוי סדרי העדיפויות במדינה.
Only if we really decrease this share of the budget [the defense budget] will we be able to increase it [the budget] in other places. Otherwise, we'll keep chasing our own tail and pulling the short blanket from side to side. Do we have an opinion on the budget? Because if we don't have an opinion, this means that we don't have a real direction and a way to change the priorities in the country.

Blogger Ziv Turner [he] blasted the current Israeli government for managing to simultaneously collect heavy taxes from the population that struggles to make ends meet, while increasing the deficit and not providing the population with adequate services. He writes:

תקציב הביטחון השוטף זה הבלוף בהא הידיעה של האמא של הבלופים בישראל. צבא עשיר ומנופח, עם מכפלות של זרועות ומטות מלחמה, ודל בחשיבה לטווח ארוך. לא נשארו לנו אויבים מסביבנו שיכולים להביא אותנו לקיצינו, שמאיימים על קיומנו. נשארנו עם נסראללה ואיראן. בשביל זה לא צריך כזה צבא מנופח.
The defense budget is the biggest lie of all lies in Israel. A rich and bloated army, with numerous arms and commanders, but without long-term thinking. We don't have enemies around us who can annihilate us, who threaten our existence. We are left with Nasrallah and Iran. For this we don't need such a bloated army.
The Defense Budget by Amitai Sandy

Cartoon of The Defense Budget by Amitai Sandy. Used with permission. Text from right-to-left: A-You, B-Me, C-the next war.

Writing in the blog +972 Magazine, Timna Axel discussed the influence of the defense budget and the occupation of the Palestinian territories on social inequality in Israel:

And then there is the slashing of social expenditures in the budget, which during the second Intifadah totaled NIS 65 billion, while the defense budget increased by NIS 15 billion. Cuts to child allowances and unemployment pay have caused a consistent rise in the poverty rate, and government income transfers designed to combat it make an even smaller dent in poverty now than they did in the 1980s. The report quotes economist Momi Dahan, who writes that “an in-depth analysis of the factors causing Israel to have more poor than any other developed country cannot overlook the fact that Israel spends seven percent of its GDP on defense, compared with 1.5 percent on average in the other developed countries.”

Blogger Yuval Ron [he] on the other hand, saw the settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories as a way to decrease the defense budget, writing:

חלקו הגדול של תקציב המדינה הוא תקציב הביטחון. תקציב ביטחון כה גדול מעכב ומונע פעילויות חשובות בתחומים חיוניים אחרים. הגנת גבולות המדינה על ידי הצבא בלבד ללא התיישבות היתה מטילה על המערכת הצבאית עול כבד ביותר הן מבחינת עומס כוח האדם והן מבחינה כלכלית. קיומם של ישובים בקו הגבול מקל על הצבא את הפעילות ההגנתית וחוסך למדינה כוח אדם וסכומי כסף ניכרים.
The largest part of the state's budget is the defense budget. The defense budget is so large that it delays or prevents important government actions on other necessary issues. The defense of the borders by the army alone, without the settlements, would place a very heavy burden on the army, both in terms of manpower and money. The existence of the settlements along the border make it easier for the army to perform its defensive actions and saves the state manpower and significant sums of money.
ISN logoThis post and its translations to Spanish, Arabic and French were commissioned by the International Security Network (ISN) as part of a partnership to seek out citizen voices on international relations and security issues worldwide. This post was first published on the ISN blog, see similar stories here.

Start the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.