Rallies have been held daily in the South Korean capital of Seoul for two weeks now, protesting against the country's Free Trade Agreement  (FTA) with the United States, which was ratified by the National Assembly of South Korea on November 22, 2011. Citizens have expressed deep discontent with the government and the ruling Grand National party, for ramming though the agreement despite strong public opposition, as well as a distrust of the mainstream media who rarely report on any anti-FTA protests.
Reports on the protests
The most recent protest on December 3, gathered several thousand protesters  [ko] across the country. One of South Korea’s most influential citizen journalists, Media Mongu (@mediamongu ), tweeted [ko] a photo of the protest:
종로1가 대로 경찰병력에 고립. 경찰 사방에서 해산경고 방송 중. 사거리 일대 시민들 가득 지켜보고 있음.pic.twitter.com/yyfK9pf8 
Kwon Soo-hee (@tkawlsdlftls ) tweeted [ko] that although the authorities blame the protest for causing traffic jams in the busy streets of Seoul, it is in fact the police and their over-reaction that is creating the problem:
교통체증도 경찰이 먼저 도로를 점거하고 버스를 줄줄이 대니까 그렇지요. 버스를 타고 지나가다 보면 버스에 타고 있는 사람들도 FTA반대집회에 참여는 못하고 있지만 경찰 욕을 엄청 합니다.
As intense protests continue and are unlikely to die out soon, net users have been sharing tips  [ko] on how to stay safe and how to respond to police investigation. Bak Chan-hong (@mindgood ) tweeted [ko] the public defenders’ phone numbers in each province.
For and against
Although the government, the ruling Grand National Party and most mainstream media claim the FTA with the United States is crucial for the export-dominant South Korean economy, some liberal media, citizen journalists and activists stress that it profits only the few huge corporations directly related with the export, whilst negatively impacting small local businesses.
They have also expressed deep concerns over toxic clauses in the agreement, such as the investor-state dispute (ISD) system, which permits an overseas investor to sue the country via an international dispute settlement agency.
The majority of normal citizens are voicing strong opposition and silent elites have started speak out too. Judges who usually take conservative sides and rarely express their opinion in public have criticized the deal. Last week, one senior judge's long Facebook post  [ko] criticizing the current president and the free trade agreement with the United States came under fire. The Supreme Court has decided to refer him to the ethics committee for violating political neutrality.
Warning the agreement could undermine the nation’s judicial sovereignty, about 170 judges have signed a petition  [ko] requesting the Supreme Court form a task force to re-negotiate the deal, which they plan to file soon. Bak Chan-hong (@mindgood ) sided  [ko]with the judges’ decision:
판사들의 한미FTA재협상 요구가 거세지자 외통부는 충분한 이해가 없이 발언했다고 반박했군요. 그런데 외통부는 수백건이 넘는 협정문 번역오류로 국제망신을 당했지요. 이 정도면 이해부족보다 더한 자질부족이지요.
Well-known movie directors have publicly denounced the deal and lampooned the authorities. After the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade commented “if stepping on me [an expression of strong determination that they would do anything to make it work] would help end controversies surrounding the trade deal, let them do that”, famous movie director Jang Jin  said [ko] on the South Korean Saturday Night Live television show, “Many people wish to know the exact location and time [for the literal ‘stepping on’]. We encourage participation from our audience.”
Mistrust of mainstream media
The mainstream media’s silence has further fueled public anger, with many people looking to international media for reports on the deal. One group has translated a long New York Times analysis  [ko] from English to Korean and one net user posted a Japanese scholar’s analysis  on online citizen media via the WikiTree site with Korean subtitles.
South Korea’s most popular satirical podcast show, ‘I'm a Petty-Minded Creep’ (Naggomsu – read a Global Voices article  about the show) has become more popular then ever, reflecting South Koreans’ deep mistrust of the mainstream media.
On November 30, Naggomsu held a open-door talk concert in Seoul, as a way of protesting the trade deal and lampooned the president and political heavy-weights with allegations. Over 50,000 people showed up. The police, however, estimated the number of crowds at around 16,000 people.
Net users, such as Kim Seung-gyu, negates  [ko] the police's claim. (See this fantastic photo  of the talk concert that shows how large the event was, from South Korean grassroots online media outlet, OhmyNews)
내 회사퇴근하고 칼퇴근하고 거기갔소 추운날씨에 정말많이 왔소[…]내 숫자를 잘몰라 세어보진 못햇지만 그게1만6천이면 내 확신컨데 한국인구는 2000천만정도일거요. 내 좌파는 아니오만 좌파라치고 이번엔. 거리로 나가야하오.
Well-known professor and vocal critic of the president and the ruling party, Tak Hyun-min (@tak0518 ), was the concert director and he issued an embargo on journalists and reporters from mainstream conservative media, including Dong-a, Chosun, Joongang and Yonhap. These media companies have became extremely unpopular over the years for allegedly feeding people with biased, pro-government views on almost every issues.
Mr. Tak tweeted  [ko]:
제가 기존언론사들과 몇개 찌라시들을 공개적으로 취재금지 선언하는 것은 당신들의 한계와, 의뭉스러움과, 거짓말을 알기 때문이고, 그걸 알고 있는 내일의 관객들이 맘상할까 싶어 미리 막는 것입니다. 그냥 공연을 보세요.. 그건 환영이니까.
Naggomsu may hit a snag soon as the government tightens its control online. On December 1, the Korea Communications Commissions pressed through a bill that forms a new censorship task force team for filtering messages on social media and mobile applications.