Russia: Creators of Election Violation Map Come Under Attack

This post is part of our special coverage Russia Elections 2011.

With less than a week to go until Russia's parliamentary elections, the Golos [ru] election monitoring association has been experiencing unprecedented pressure, including a break-in by an NTV television team, accusatory articles in major newspapers, and a call for the organization's closure signed by three parliament deputies.

The main reason for this pressure? Its popular crowdsourced Election Violation Map (, developed by together with

“You're Surkov's Propaganda”

On November 26, 2011, newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta published [ru] an almost stereotypical accusatory article about Golos’ associations. The article implied that Golos is a “fifth column” and an agent of United States foreign policy:

An example of electioneering violation. Photo by on Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0).

An example of electioneering violation. Photo by on Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0).

Среди партнеров “Голоса” называют такие структуры из США, как Агентство по международному развитию (USAID), Национальный фонд за демократию (NED), Национальный демократический институт (NDI). Более того, в организации не скрывают, что существуют на деньги, приходящие из-за рубежа.

Among the partners of “Golos” are institutions from the United States such as the United States Agency for International Development, National Endowment for Democracy, and National Democratic Institute. Moreover, the organization doesn't hide that it exists due to the funds that come from abroad.

On November 28, while Golos held a press conference in the Independent Press Center, a team of NTV journalists broke into the organisation's offices expecting to shoot footage that would be later used in an accusatory TV programme. Similar cases have previously involved independent politician Yevgeniy Roizman, former Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov [ru], Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko [ru] and many others.

Grigoriy Melkonyants, deputy chairman of Golos, managed to counter the aggressive (and still anonymous as their names are not disclosed) television journalists. He recorded everything and used the Internet-born technique of trolling (repeating the same slogan continuously and almost zombie-like to confuse one's opponent) saying “You're Surkov's propaganda” [Vladislav Surkov – first deputy chief of the presidential staff responsible for handling political issues].

The same day YouTube user videogolos uploaded the video [ru] of the break-in (~301,000 views so far):

In the video Melkonyants repeats the slogan 86 times. Later it transformed into a Twitter hashtag #высурковскаяпропаганда [ru]. As Alexander Morozov, chief editor of, noted [ru]:

это просто гениальный какой-то пример “встречного телевидения”. Снимая, видимо, на телефон или на любительскую камеру с руки, активист “Голоса” замучил юного корреспондента НТВ. Одной этой съемкой и мантрой “вы – сурковская пропаганда” этот великий человек мало того, что развалил атаку на “Голос”, но он еще и создал уникальный прецедент борьбы “альтернативного телевидения” с “традиционным”…

This is a brilliant example of “counter-television.” By shooting video, probably on a smartphone or an amateur camera, the Golos activist talked the NTV journalist's head off. Through only this footage and the mantra “You're Surkov's propaganda”, this great man not only dismantled the attack on Golos but also had created a unique precedent of the fight between “alternative” and “traditional” television…

True test of the Opposition

The attack on Golos would not be complete if no one had called for the organization's closure. Three deputies have written an appeal to the Investigative Committee of the Prosecutor's Office, to investigate the activity of the foreign-sponsored election monitoring NGO.

Surprisingly, only one deputy, Andrey Nazarov, belonged to the dominating United Russia party, whilst Anton Belyakov came from A Just Russia, and Maksim Rohmistrov from LDPR.

The appearance of other parties to support the call, parties which are usually the object of violations themselves, was considered by many as a proof of the tight control exercised by the Kremlin over political parties, even those that are considered to be opposing.

Popular journalist Oleg Kashin wrote [ru] that the reaction towards this letter was “the true test of the ‘oppositionness'” of those parties:

чтобы доказать, что они действительно хотят всерьез бороться за голоса, им нужно всего лишь исключить Белякова и Рохмистрова из фракций.

In order to prove that they really want to fight for the votes, they just need to exclude Belyakov and Rokhmistrov from their fractions.

The reaction of the two Opposition parties was quite different. Within 24 hours of the revelation of the conflict, all leaders of A Just Russia party had condemned Belyakov's support of the call for closure (although no one has dismissed Belyakov yet). LDPR simply ignored the case.

Gennadiy Gudkov, deputy chairman of A Just Russia's faction in Duma, tweeted [ru]:

Заявляю,подпись Белякова-его личная инициатива,идущая против линии партии(см.мое выступл.от 18.11 от фракции).Мы поддерж.все общ.орг-ции>

I announce, the signature of Belyakov is his private initiative, which goes against the party line (see my statement on November 18). We support all NGOs
Promotional banner for the Violation Map (deleted from

Promotional banner for the Violation Map (deleted from

Disappearing banner and the “Streisand effect”

Early on 30 November, bloggers noticed that, the partner of the Golos association on its Violation Map, had removed a banner promoting the map project from its website.

Alexander Kynev, an election expert, wrote [ru]:

Думаю она – карта нарушений – и есть главный объект движухи. Им нужно уничтожить канал аккумулирования информации о нарушениях. Так что объем давления можете представить

I think that the Violation Map is the main object of the action. They need to destroy the channel of accumulation of information about [election] violations. So, you can imagine the amount of pressure.

Mikhail Kotov, editor in chief of, and one of the creators of the Violation Map, explained [ru] away the removal of the banner with commercial reasons:

сейчас такой период, это коммерческое место стало востребовано коммерческой рекламой. Но с «Голосом» мы по-прежнему партнеры.

Right now we have such a period that this advertisement place is needed for commercial advertisement. But we're still partners with Golos.

The political undercurrent of the decision to remove the banner surfaced very quickly. Roman Badanin, deputy chief editor, resigned [ru] right after Kotov's interview, explaining that the Violation Map was among those things he had curated personally. After it became evident that the Violation Map “no longer suited the leadership and the owners of the website”, Badanin said to [ru], it would have been “cowardice” to continue the work.

It is important to note that two days earlier, Grigoriy Okhotin, editor in chief of, a portal that translates foreign articles about Russia into Russian, resigned after RIA Novosti (the owner of asked him to avoid political and negative topics. RIA Novosti in return has filed a lawsuit against Okhotin.

Again, the ease of interconnections and alliances enabled by networked technology, prove that even the loss of a main media partner is not a disastrous failure. Almost simultaneously with Badanin's resignation,, a popular blog platform (~1 million unique visitors monthly), announced [ru] itself as the main media partner of and placed the banner as one of its rotating ads.

It seems that induced the ‘Streisand Effect‘, whereby any attempt to contain the spread of information results in the opposite reaction. As popular blogger Oleg Kozyrev tweeted [ru]:

Почему у единороссов такие недальновидные деятели? Ведь очевидно, что теперь про Карту нарушений будет знать полстраны

Why are “United Russia” representatives so short-sighted? It is evident that now half of the country will know about the Violation Map.

A deeper trend

The Violation Map incident is just an indicator of a much deeper trend – the growing will for the need of change, exercised by free, non-falsified elections. In previous election cycles, most journalists would not have resigned and no big portal would have been brave enough to advertise election violation monitoring.

Aside from the deeper sociological undercurrent, technology plays a crucial role in all presented stories. Without trolling, Grigoriy Melkonyants would not have been able to confuse the experienced accusatory journalist from NTV. Without social networks, political party A Just Russia wouldn't have been able to denounce Belyakov's actions in calling to close Golos as fast as it did.

Finally, none of these events would actually have happened if Golos and had not united in producing the Violation Map. Golos has had an election violation database since 2008, but it never was as influential as it is now.

This suggests the success of the project relies heavily on its online mapping element (if any event gets concrete geographic coordinates it automatically gets more real and more appealing) and having a proper media partner.

This post is part of our special coverage Russia Elections 2011.


Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.