Written byVeronica Khokhlova
- English
- हिन्दी
- Ελληνικά
- Italiano
- Español
- русский
- українська
- Română
- Malagasy
- عربي
- Esperanto
- 日本語
- Português
- srpski
- Nederlands
- Français
- বাংলা
- Deutsch
- Filipino
- 繁體中文
- Aymara
- македонски
- bahasa Indonesia
- Shqip
- नेपाली
- ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ
- Magyar
- polski
- اردو
- Dansk
- ଓଡ଼ିଆ
- Igbo
- Yorùbá
- Swahili
- ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
- čeština
- فارسی
- Қазақша
- Türkçe
- 한국어
- Български
- Svenska
- Ўзбекча
- Català
- 简体中文
- አማርኛ
- كوردی
- မြန်မာ
- پښتو
- ⲛογπίⲛ
- עברית
- Tetun
- ភាសាខ្មែរ
See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.
Learn more about Lingua Translation »
This site is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Please read our attribution policy to learn about freely redistributing our work Some Rights Reserved
1 comment
Afgantsy: A superlative book indeed. A thin and disenchanted vision, respectful of the true problems of the comparison among models of development doped versus traditional worlds. The “great” European and American wise would have done better to go to take lesson from the diplomat.
They have believed to be able to revolve the golden rule of the imperialism: first not to invade Russia , second not to invade Afghanistan only changing the name : “humanitary mission” instead of ” invasion”. But it’s not enough…
The italian ex diplomat Giulio Terzi di Sant’agata has also reversed the meaning of “disaster” with “success”…
Emilio