Japan: “Why do we need nuclear power?”

This post is part of our special coverage on the Japan Earthquake 2011.

Debates over the risks and benefits of nuclear power plants have sparked worldwide, since an 8.9-magnitude earthquake struck Japan on Friday, 11 March causing widespread fear that the nuclear reactors of at least two power plants near Fukushima may be at risk of melt down. Thousands of citizens in areas at risk of radiation in the North East region are being evacuated in case the very worst should happen. There was an explosion at one plant in Fukushima on Saturday, 12 March.

Throughout the day, Japanese citizens shared their concerns on Twitter. Some urging against alarmist tweeting that could cause panic, and many more venting frustrations over safety risks.

Takuya Kawai (@himanainu_kawai) a teacher and leading social media personality in Japan belongs to the former category:

@himanainu_kawai: 原発では被爆しながら作業してくれている人がいる。そのことに感謝し場違いな原発批判は控えましょう。

@himanainu_kawai: There are people working in the nuclear power plant that are facing exposure to radiation. Let’s be thankful and refrain from nuclear power criticism now.
Satellite image showing earthquake damage at the Fukushima Dai-Ni nuclear power plant. Image credit: DigitalGlobe www.digitalglobe.com (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0).

Satellite image showing earthquake damage at the Fukushima Dai-Ni nuclear power plant. Image credit: DigitalGlobe www.digitalglobe.com (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0).

Others have questioned the wisdom of developing nuclear energy in such an earthquake-prone country as Japan:

@saltfish_nsk: 電力会社は、地震が原発にとって最悪の事態を引き起こす事は百も承知。そもそも日本は地震国。何故それが必要なのか、事故は原爆と同じ事。お上は過去から何を学んできたのか。

@saltfish_nsk: Electric companies know well enough that earthquakes could cause the worst to happen to a nuclear power plant. First and foremost, Japan is an earthquake country. Why do we need nuclear power? Any accident is the same as the A-bomb. It makes one wonder what have the government has learned from the past.

A blogger who describes himself as a pacifist and former officer of Japanese self-defence forces (@BND7) leaves little room for debate:

@BND7: 日本に原発は必要です

@BND7: Japan needs nuclear power plants.

A magazine editor and spare time musician says:

@gocci0515: 普段使いたい放題電気使ってるクセに、こういう事態になると「原発原発」ってよく知りもせずに毛嫌いする。じゃあ他のエネルギー源を教えてくれ。自分たちの存在自体が必要悪だって言いながら、事故に遭ってる関係者の気持ちを考えろ!原子力に代わるものがあればいいのにと一番願ってるのは彼らだ。

@gocci0515: People use as much electricity as they like on any given day, and then start spouting dislike for nuclear power when something like this happens, even though most people just don’t understand it that well. Then give us an alternative energy source! If you’re going to say that your existence is a necessary evil, think about how the personnel onsite must feel. They are the ones that most wish for an alternative to nuclear power.

Who is to blame?

Some critics have placed the blame for the catastrophic situation on the energy demands of large cities such as capital Tokyo.

@mokko0307: 福島とか新潟に原発があるのは東京とかの人のためなんだよね。無駄な電気使わなければ原発必要なかったし今こんなことにもならなかったのに・・・って思うと(´;ω;`) ほんとに電気の無駄遣いとかまじめに考えるべきですね・・・

@mokko0307: The reason we have nuclear power plants in Fukushima and Niigata Prefectures [regions] is for people in Tokyo and other big cities. If people didn’t waste electricity, there wouldn't be a need for these facilities and things like this wouldn’t have had to happen….. We should seriously tackle the issue of electricity waste.

Anger has been directed by some at a perceived last of interest or concern in the disaster and affected people, particularly in Tokyo. This tweet is from Saturday:

@cobayasu: こと渋谷に関して言えば、オーロラビジョンもいつも通り流れていたし、TSUTAYAも開 いていた。パチンコ屋は土曜日ということもあって混んでいた。福島の原発や、被災者の方々の現実とは無関係のように、渋谷は日常を取り戻そうとしている。 街にTwitter上の一体感や危機感は見えない…

@cobayasu: In regards to Shibuya [area in central Tokyo], the big screen display Aurora Vision is alight as usual, as are the shops. Pachinko parlours [amusement gambling arcades] are open, and it’s crowded like on a usual Saturday. Shibuya is working to regain its day-to-day life as if it has no connection to the reality of Fukushima’s nuclear plant and afflicted people. The feeling of unity and crisis on Twitter can't be felt throughout town.

Referring to how few companies had switched off their electric signs on the night of 12 March, @MasaKawaKAKA tweeted:

Japanese company Glico pays respects to quake victims with a blackout of its iconic sign in Osaka. Image posted by Twitpic user @MasaKawaKAKA.

Japanese company Glico pays respects to quake victims with advert blackout. Image posted by Twitpic user @MasaKawaKAKA.

@MasaKawaKAKA: この中で、状況を理解している企業は「グリコ」だけだ! http://twitpic.com/48r1o9

@MasaKawaKAKA: Glico is the only one company that understands the situation! http://twitpic.com/48r1o9

What to do?

As new problems with the emergency cooling systems of nuclear power plants continue to surface, there are many fearful tweets:

@WindyxLady: あの映像、原発やばいでしょ。風向きは被災地側。最悪の状況か? 海外に原子力に精通する作業のエキスパートの支援が必要なのでは。 国民にも話せないほど深刻な問題なのだろうか?

@WindyxLady: That clip of the nuclear power plant is freaking scary! The wind is blowing toward the stricken area. Could this be the worst situation? We might need some expert advice from overseas that are familiar with the workings of nuclear power. Is this something so serious that the government can’t tell its people?

A web programmer in Fukuoka Prefecture takes a fatalist stance:

@sino1945: まぁ…遠くにいる私が福島原発の詳細を知る必要は、ない。知ったところで、ね。現場の健闘と無事を祈るのみ。

@sino1945: Well… as someone far away from Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, I need not know the details. Can’t do anything even if I had information, right? I can only pray for the safety and efforts of the staff on the ground.

This post is part of our special coverage on the Japan Earthquake 2011.

Tomomi Sasaki translated from Japanese.


  • […] following the Japanese earthquake, where the risk of fire in nuclear power stations near Fukushima has revived the debate on nuclear energy. The journalist Alvaro Colmer Moreno in his blog Frente al escritorio [es] (In […]

  • […] 1986年、現在のウクライナのプリピャチで史上最悪の原子力事故が起こった。チェルノブイリ原子力発電所の事故である。それでも、300世帯がかの地へ戻り、今もそこで暮らしている。大地震で福島の原発の爆発の危険が高まると、原子力エネルギーに関する論争は再燃した。そして、チェルノブイリ事故も今また議論の的になっている。ジャーナリストのAlvaro Colmer Morenoは彼のブログFrente al escritorio [es](In Front Of My Desk)でLa Vanguardia 紙に2006年4月に寄稿した記事を掲載し、チェルノブイリ事故とその地域の現在の状況を解説している: Y, sin embargo, ahí vive gente. Algún tiempo después de que el gobierno decretara la evacuación sin condiciones de los 350.000 soviéticos que vivían en la ‘Zona de Exclusión’, varios centenares de personas decidieron regresar a sus antiguas poblaciones aun a riesgo de perecer a causa de la radiación. En un principio, las autoridades sanitarias prohibieron tal retorno e incluso instalaron una alambrada alrededor del área afectada. Pero la gente se las ingeniaba para regresar a casa y al final, viendo que aquello se convertía en el juego del gato y el ratón, el ejército permitió que esos ciudadanos volvieran a ocupar un territorio a todas luces contaminado. それでもなお、そこに住む人がいる。立ち入り禁止区域となった地域の35万人の住民に対し政府の退避命令が出てしばらくすると、生命に関わる放射能リスクがあるにもかかわらず数百人が元の居留地に戻っていった。当初、保健当局は帰還を禁止し汚染地域の周囲に柵を張り巡らしたが、それでも人々は柵を乗り越え元の家に帰り着いた。政府と住民との駆け引きはいたちごっこだった。ついに汚染地域を住民が占拠することを軍も認めた。 […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.