Close

Support Global Voices

To stay independent, free, and sustainable, our community needs the help of friends and readers like you.

Donate now »

See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Sudan Elections 2010: The good, the bad and the ugly

On April 11, 2010 citizens in Sudan went to the polls for the first time in 24 years. A whole generation that was born, raised, educated and graduated under one totalitarian government rule has been able to cast their vote.

Sudanese elections would pave the road for a 2011 South Sudan referendum, which might change the geographic boundaries of the largest country in Africa forever.

Please join me in finding out what is happening in the Sudan from bloggers in Sudan and the Diaspora.

Writing in her blog post Observing Sudan's elections, Fatma Naib says:

The process was supposed to start from 0800am Mecca time. I arrived at a polling station in central Khartoum, where voting began more than an hour late.

But the delay did little to dim the fervour of several 60-year-old women, who were waiting eagerly for the voting process to start.

I asked some of them of how they felt. Khadija, 63, said that she was excited and this is her “right” as a Sudanese. I noticed that there were a lot of older women and soldiers who came early to cast their vote.

While at the polling station, she noted that there were not many young Sudanese in the 18-35 age group:

I didn't see many young Sudanese in the 18-35 age group. Perhaps this will change in the coming days.

The process was observed by local and international observers. The Carter Center was there and Jimmy Carter, the former US president, came to watch the process unfold. When asked about what he thought of the polling procedures, he said that everything seemed “orderly”.

A member of “Girifna” group (which means We Are Fed Up or  Disgusted) states: “I voted for the first time in my life yesterday in the first Sudanese elections in 24 years”:

I voted for the first time in my life yesterday in the first Sudanese elections in 24 years. The first vote I ever cast was in an election that is rigged and predetermined. I debated whether I should even cast it because all the opposition candidates had pulled out, and there was so much evidence of foul play during the registration period and leading up to the elections, that it seemed pointless. I voted anyway, partly because my candidate was still on the ballot despite having pulled out, and because I wanted to exercise my right to vote against President Bashir and the ruling National Congress Party (NCP).

Girifna calls for Observer Missions to stop lending credibility to Sudan’s Elections:

International observer missions have so far been subject to severe government intimidation. The Sudanese government harshly criticized the Carter Center after publication of its report on March 17, 2010 which detailed significant violations in the elections process throughout all stages including fraud and repression of speech and other freedoms. The report also described the uneven playing field for political parties and unequal access to media suggesting technical advises to enable National Election Commission (NEC) to handle the electoral process.  Since then the Sudanese government has on multiple occasions threatened all international observer groups more broadly.  On March 22 President Omar al Bashir publicly threatened to cut off the noses and fingers of internationals who “intervene in internal affairs” and endorsed any delay of elections. He repeated this threat on April 5 in Jazeera State. Threats to international actors who intervene to oppose any postponement of the poll—such as for example, the United States Special Envoy— are conspicuously absent.

In the same article, the group argues that international observers are undermining local observers:

This silent acquiescence by international observer missions in the face of increasing repression also undermines the attempts of local domestic observers to monitor the process. Today, for example, a number of local organisations, all of which have been internationally recognized as independent civil society experts, were summarily informed they would not be permitted to participate as election monitors by the NEC. The NEC refused to provide either a copy of this determination in writing or reasons for the decision. The silence is contributing to the climate of fear and insecurity which is unfolding around the elections, adding to both the apprehension and probability of violence and greater repression.

The Sudan Tribune is of the opinion that the presence of international observers in Sudan serve the interest of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP).

BlackKush concludes that the whole process is turning out to be a sham:

If the elctions are not going to be free and fare in the North, how will it be in the South? Is it not the same elections, same ballots and same NEC? When there are no explanations, the conspiracy theories abound and I like what I hear, because it goes with what I believe a long time ago that it is going to happen: that SPLM is handing Northern Sudan to NCP and NCP is handing Southern Sudan to the SPLM. That will be the results of the elections, each ensuring their grip in power. And the oppositions parties, they can go to hell.

The opposition have already sensed this and said the SPLM cut a deal with NCP. Are they right? Maybe. Bashir has threatened to postpone the crucial referrundum in the South in 2011 if SPLM withdraw completely from the elections aor asked for delays. For the SPLM, 2011 is much more important than the elections.

Finally, Sudan Thinker questions the role of the United States of America in this historic elections:

why do the US envoy to Sudan and Jimmy Carter seem to express a rather optimistic, albeit cautious views about the event? Well, to answer that, one first needs to notice that the US administration took a position contrary to that of the opposition parties in Sudan.

While many in the opposition wanted the elections to be postponed, the US pressed that they should continue on time, regardless of boycotts and threats of more boycotts by the opposition. This is because America views the historic event within the bigger and more important context in which it is happening: the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which has milestones and a timeline designed to lead to the Southern Sudan referendum in January 2011.

7 comments

  • Tyler

    A valuable and concise compendium of informed commentary. Nice work.

  • Thank you, it was nice finding deferent opinion on the net about what is happing in the Sudan. thank you for reading.

  • Great job Mahid. Well informed indeed. Keep it up!

  • thanks Hisham, i am happy that it turn out to be well informative, if it wasn’t for the encouragement of sonala and the help and the review of ndesanjo i would not have known how i would have accomplish this work. i am indeed very thankful for that.

    Mahid

  • Ali

    We don’t care waht America think, or do they need to solve thier own problems. 1.50 T. Budget dif.

  • Very useful overview, Mahid. Glad to have you as part of the GV community.

  • EthanZ, thanks you very much for welcoming me to GV and it has been a great experience so far being part of this community. Thank you for the welcome.

    Ali, my friend I guess the problems that some of us Sudanese people have is that we look outward for trouble where we have enough trouble in our own country. if you mean America as in the USA then I think you need to know that the trouble that we have in the Sudan is not caused by the USA or EU or even china. Well china is another issue. well let me point an issue that I have pointed several times before, i would like to point out that the Sudan today is not the Sudan today because of Global politician, I would like to also state that we need to remember that the Sudan we know has been destroyed by its own people from militaristic regimes to regimes that clam to be Islamic and have nothing to do with Islam. The west is not the enemy nor is global politician who might have a say from time to time, the people who destroyed Sudan, are from Sudan themselves, these people who claim to be Sudanese, for long have destroyed their country with dictatorship ruling and brother fighting brother in the north-south war and in the introduction of communist ideas like the that of the dictator Jafar numari and much, much more. Now Ali my friend if this answer is not what you expected then tells me what you think and i would be happy to reply. thank you for your comment and looking forward to hearing from you soon.
    Mahid

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices!

Submitted addresses will be confirmed by email, and used only to keep you up to date about Global Voices and our mission. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Newsletter powered by Mailchimp (Privacy Policy and Terms).

* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site