Cambodia: Campaign Against Wearing of Short Skirts

Around 100 people including teachers and students held a rally on Sunday March 28 in an effort to stop female students from wearing short skirts. The campaign was expected to have more participants if its original plan to march through the streets of Phnom Penh was approved by the City Hall. Still, the campaign organizer, Seang Bunheang, Director of Khmer Teachers’ Association reportedly applauded this gathering as a success in sending the message of urging the Ministry of Education, academic institutions, teachers, female students and their parents to stop female students from wearing short skirts. This appeal is hoped to preserve Khmer Culture and discourage female students from vigorously adapting western culture:

“I had the idea to organise the campaign because I want to improve Khmer culture [and retain the culture] that we had many years ago – some Khmer women change their manner by copying other cultures and do things such as wearing short skirts or sexy clothes in schools and public places. That can destroy our culture,” says Seang Bunheang as quoted from Phnom Penh Post.

Acknowledging the the move could be seen as an undue pressure on women, the organizer repeatedly claimed it is justified for promoting Khmer culture.

I don’t force [women] from wearing short skirts, but I want to take care and improve our Khmer culture, “We have to take care in order for other countries not to look down on us.”

Seemingly, this campaign has been welcomed by major ministries, Cambodian Independent Teachers’ Association, and some students. For example, there is support from Pov Sam An, deputy director of the Ministry's Informal Education System Department who reportedly agrees that female students should not wear short skirts. He also cited the existing mandatory rule instructing female students to wear only long skirts.

“All female students have to wear their skirts under the knees in school, and it is good that the Khmer Teachers’ Association campaign will remind people of this, I cannot accept that some female students in private or state schools wear such short skirts to school,” said Pov Sam An.

Even the Secretary of State of the Ministry of Women's Affairs, San Arun, also welcomed the rally by sharing a similar opinion about the need to preserve Khmer culture. She allegedly claimed that “the trend towards shorter skirts was part of an ill-advised attempt to copy other cultures – a move she suggested could destroy Khmer culture if left unchecked.” Interestingly, she linked the short skirt as motivation for men to rape:

“Wearing short skirts and sexy clothes is a reason to cause rape cases to occur because all men, when they see white skin, they feel like having sex with them.”

This provocative statement has caught the attention of a prominent blogher Kounila Keo who posted this on her facebook page, which later sparked several comments. Here is an interesting remark by a commentator:

“This is like saying women in the Middle East who walk outside of the places they're allowed to, are asking to be raped. I think the Secretary is perpetuating a negative cultural attitude between genders. I'm sorry but women and short skirts are NOT the problem…I find that the leaders in Cambodia are part of the problem. If they want to positively change attitudes of the people, they need to start providing an avenue to discuss about these gender issues–not condemn those who are ultimately in ‘ownership’ of their bodies.”

This idea is shared by Sim Socheata who sent a letter to Phnom Penh Post's editor, “Don't blame women for men's lack of self control”:

“We are witnessing that women and girls are blamed for being raped and sexually harassed for the kind of place they decide to go, the kind of dresses they decide to wear and the length of those dresses. Instead of calling for women to stop wearing short skirts, the Khmer Teachers Association could have marched against male perpetrators who rape women and girls, men who commit violence in the family, male teachers who sexually harass their students.”

While majority of those who commented on Kounila's facebook page believe that wearing short skirts is not the problem, Chanroeun Pa who also joined this debate wrote about the link between cultural integration and safety of women:

I don't completely agree with the secretary of the MoWA, and I don't really support the school girls to wear short skirt either. It is obvious that wearing short skirt is a Western style. In fact, there is nothing wrong with wearing the short skirt for the school girls in general. Instead it is an art or beauty of dressing for girl. But wearing short skirt which is too short in an inappropriate way and in wrong place is a great danger for the person herself. And therefore, this requires a consideration about the different cultural values between Cambodian culture and the West. We have to accept that new culture which emerges from the interaction with other culture is sometimes overwhelming. And the ground somehow is suitable for the seed to grow well. We will, should not ignore the sensitivity of sexual taboo in Cambodian society either. There is a saying about choice of cultural adoption, “You can either adjust your head to fit your hat, or adjust your hat to fit your head.”

Meanwhile, another blogger, Mean Lux is not in favor of the anti-short skirt campaign and issues this warning:

For protesters against wearing short skirt, facebook maybe next in their list to be banned to preserve the in-their-view Khmer tradition.

As expected, this campaign has received much attention. The debate is still ongoing with another social activist Chhay Sophal, writer for Open Institute, wrote “ទស្សនៈ​ពី​ការ​ស្លៀកពាក់​បញ្ចេញ​សាច់”, “View on Skimpy Dresses.” He randomly interviewed young females in the capital and two other provinces to survey their opinion on the campaign. Though many respondents agreed that the ban on wearing short skirts is viable for academic institutions, they think it should not be applied in public spaces. Strikingly, the belief that wearing short skirts induces rape cases surprises the respondents:

“កាល​ពី​មិន​ទាន់​មាន​ការ​ស្លៀក​ពាក់​ខ្លី​បែប​នេះ​កាល​ពី​បណ្ដា​ឆ្នាំ​មុនៗ និង​ជំនាន់​មុនៗ តើ​មិន​មាន​​ករណី​ការ​ចាប់​រំលោភ​សេពសន្ថវៈ​មែន​ទេ​ឬ​អី ហើយ​តើ​បុរស​ៗ​ពិត​ជា​មិន​មាន​អារម្មណ៍​ចង់​រួម​ភេទ​មែន​ដែរ​ឬ​អត់ បើ​ពួកគេ​មិន​បាន​ឃើញ​សាច់​ស​ខ្ចី​របស់​នារីៗ​នោះ? នារី​វ័យ​ក្មេងៗ​ទាំង​នោះ​បាន​សំណូមពរ​ថា មនុស្ស​ជំនាន់​មុន​មិន​ត្រូវ​បន្ទោស​មនុស្ស​ជំនាន់​ក្រោយ​ឡើយ ព្រោះ​សម័យ​កាល និង​ការ​វិវត្ត​វា​ពិតជា​ខុស​គ្នា​ពី​ជំនាន់​មួយ​ទៅ​ជំនាន់​មួយ។”

“Were rape cases avoided in the past when there were no skimpy outfits? Will men have no sex feelings if the girls would not wear short skirts? The girls request the elders to accept the reality of social evolutions instead of blaming their acts”

Sophal highlighted that the respondents also reflected on the basic rights and freedom of individuals as guaranteed by the Constitution and international rights conventions. Further, the respondents appealed to the government to improve the rule of law and take serious intervention for social security rather than focusing on the short skirt matter:

សេចក្ដី​ថ្លៃថ្នូរ​របស់​ជាតិ​មួយ​គឺ​ត្រូវតែ​ទប់ស្កាត់​ការ​ជួញ​ដូរ​មនុស្ស និង​ការ​ជួញដូរ​គ្រឿងញៀន ការ​លុបបំបាត់​ទេសចរណ៍​ផ្លូវ​ភេទ ការ​លុបបំបាត់​ការ​កេង​ប្រវ័ញ្ច​លើ​ស្ត្រី និង​ត្រូវ​តែ​គោរព​សិទ្ធិ​ស្ត្រី ហើយ​ផ្ដល់​តួនាទី​ស្ត្រី​នៅ​ក្នុង​សង្គម​ប្រកប​ដោយ​សមភាព​យេនឌ័រ ការ​ផ្ដល់​សេវា​សាធារណៈ​ និង​ហេដ្ឋារចនាសម្ព័ន្ធ​សង្គម​ឲ្យបាន​គ្រប់គ្រាន់​ដល់​ពលរដ្ឋ ការ​បង្កើន​ការងារ​ឲ្យ​មនុស្ស​ធ្វើ ត្រូវ​មាន​ការ​អភិវឌ្ឍ​ទាំង​នៅ​ទីក្រុង​និង​នៅ​ជនបទ មិន​មាន​អំពើ​ពុក​រលួយ​ជា​ប្រព័ន្ធ ត្រូវ​មាន​តម្លាភាព និង​មាន​យុត្តិធម៌​សង្គម​ជាដើម។

In order to maintain the dignity of the state, there must be measures to prevent human trafficking, drug, sex tourism, and exploitation on women; importantly, there must be respect on women's rights together with gender mainstreaming in order that gender equity is feasible. Also, there must be sufficient social services and infrastructure to all in addition to the increase of employment and balanced development in the urban and rural area where there is no systematic corruption or simply transparency and justice must be ensured.

Regardless of the mixed views on this campaign, the trend is observably and likely to target girls rather than the main violators. Earlier there was also an attempt by the state to impose a girl curfew – which was justified by claiming that it would promote safety of women against being harmed at nightclubs or other entertainment areas. Groups asserted that it is better to strengthen the rule of law and restrictive policies on the nightclub itself.


  • […] 5, 2010 The culture thugs are at it again. Around 100 people including teachers and students held a rally on Sunday March 28 in an effort to […]

  • lux

    good work.

    Cambodia-internet fortune teller: short skirt > pornography > internet pornography > facebook > political active website > full internet censorship!

  • Even though being a Westerner I agree with the government that it is good to preserve some Cambodian cultures and I do not like short skirts. I guess I would even understand a ban in school, because we also have these discusssions the West (at least in Germany).

    However, this does not mean that I would support a ban. Instead, there should be a shift in attitudes of people. I cannot say that I do not feel attracted by short skirts (obviously I am a boy), but I would not go out with such a girl, because it looks like she was changing the guy each day.

    Yet, considering that there are other values in Combadia I could somehow still support a ban. I mean: In Germany you are not allowed to walk on the streets naked, so why should Cambodia not say: „We do not want people to walk around with very short skirts (male case: only underwear or something similar).“ It’s just a different thought and I somehow do not have the right to say anything about this. I can just share my thoughts and how we know it over here, but it is your decision. Even if I lived in your country, I would have to keep quiet, because I am not a Cambodian :)

    Moreover, I totally disagree with the statement that short skirts lead to rape. As mentioned in the article, there have been (are?) such opinions in Western countries, too. Yet, we cannot say that it is the female’s fault if she gets raped, it is the male’s fault.

  • Ardell

    My initial response to this issue is: uh-oh.
    It is one thing to have a dress code in schools, but a govenment ban on what women (or men for that matter) can or cannot wear could lead to trouble.
    Honestly, it makes me think of some countries in the Middle East that have such harsh restrictions on women and their clothing, and the brutalities women suffer as a result. If there is actually a ban on short skirts, how will this be enforced? Will police officers go around with tape measurerers or something? This seems like the kind of thing that could lead to violence and further censorship of women (like the girl curfew!?). Hence the uh-oh.
    Also, while I am all for preserving different cultures, I do not think it is up to the government to force laws protecting the nation’s culture. It should be up to the people to maintain their culture if they so choose. But if a woman wants to wear a short skirt, against her culture, that should be ok too. Culture is an ever-changing thing, and it shouldn’t be forced.
    Lastly, the statement that showing skin provokes rape is absolutely ridiculous. Rapists will rape, and adjusting the way women dress will not stop the sick minds from committing rape.

  • seng bee

    I think it’s not good for Cambodian girl because it’s not the Khmer culture. So all girl should wear the skirt under the knee. It’s for Khmer culture.

  • Ray Beng

    Khmer culture is much more than wearing long or short dress. This issue is silly and useless as well as potentially harmful for people. Culture comes from people and not the other way around.

  • Sandra

    I think the governments of countries should definitely be involved in setting standards for their country’s morality. It may be pointed out that short skirts were only introduced after Darwin’s theory that there might not be a God became wide spread. Until then everyone in every country knew the facts that there is a God and He is watching us and will judge what we do. It obviously does encourage women to act promiscuously, and men to take what is placed before them. You have only to search the general standards of morality since 1965 when short skirts were first introduced, to see that it is not healthy for society or cultures or anything else.

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.