Financial Secretary of Hong Kong John Tsang made the budget speech for the fiscal year 2009-2010 at the Legislative Council on 25 of February. This is the first budget report after Hong Kong felt the pain from the downturn of global financial crisis. Unlike other areas, our government's finance remains strong. It is estimated that the government will still have a surplus of 18 billion HK dollars (2.32 billion USD) in 2008-2009, and will only have a 3.99 billion HK dollars (500 million USD) deficit (equivalent to 2.4% local GDP) in coming fiscal year. It is expected that the government is equipped to fight the crisis better than others, but when the budget came out, many criticize the government for being a miser in its spending, especially in time when people need real help, and that our financial secretary's salary is higher than the US president Obama.
A miser's budget
Brian Fong pointed out that when compared with Singapore, Hong Kong government is not spending enough to deal with the crisis:
While Brain Fong looks into the budget from a macro and accountant perspective, other concern more about its actual implication on people's livelihood. It seems that the “sweets” that given out taste sour or even bitter to many:
Cheong from Citizen radio pointed out that the so-called HKD 6,000 (USD800) tax rebate is a trick:
University student on sale at HKD4000!
As the unemployment problem is getting worse, preserving job is considered the most crucial task. John Tsang decides to put the university fresh graduate on sale with a subsidy plan. However, many people worry that the policy will distort the job market as it allows corporates to pay university graduates as low as HKD 4,000 (a bit more than US500), in which HKD 2,000 is government subsidy. Ping Sim is very frustrated about this:
Facebook: Hong Kong Financial Secretary deserves HKD4000/month only!
In the facebook, several groups have been set up to protest against the policy. The most popular one is Hong Kong Financial Secretary deserves HKD4000/month only!
The group recruited more than 2000 members in the past 3 days. And its statement said:
Since Financial Secretary can't get his job done(the reasons as below)
We are now hoped that he should have a internship on how to be a good Financial Secretary and receive $4000 subsidy monthly, until he knows how to get his job done.
1.Can't realize the difficulty of the people
e.g: Government has little method to help the middle class, because government expected they can help themsleve,for example, they can get money by mortgaging their house or using their own saving.
e.g:He refuses to reduce his salary and said that it is a “show” only. However, the government officers always do their “show in the street.
3.Making lose-lose situation
(Subsidize the internship for university graduate,employer can employ the degree holder with very cheap salary.Also, the competition edge for non-degree holder will be lowered. Both degree and non-degree holder lose.)
4.Suspicion of Conflict of Interest
(Both liquor and cigarette are harmful, yet he increase the cigarette tax by 50% and eliminate the liquor tax. He loves red wine and it is reasonable that it is Conflict of Interest)
5. (Advertise on TV to collect the opinion of Governemtn Budget, yet the outcome disappoint everyone.
(Chinese opera receive huge amount of subsidy from government, other art /culture field doesn't.)
(He said that jobless White-collar worker shouldn't expected to work as White-collar job. He don't realize that if they do blue-collar job, the problem is just shift to blue collar worker.)
(Someone asked him why would he receive the salary higher than US President Obama (He:3.8m/yr Obama:3.1m/yr), he explained that it is a different issue and unable to be compared.
However, when he explain why the salary of graduate internship is worth $4k, he said that his first internship in US has no salary, he use the pocket money from his mother. Hence the graduate can get $4k is already better than him)
There are more than 100 wall posts in the group, most are frustrated comments, like this one (with my translation note on Chinese term):
This is another ” 8萬5″ (translation note: 85 thousand refers to the housing market policy of the former Chief Executive Tung Chi-wah, which distorted the market during the last financial crisis after 1997)…… Another time the government wrongly price the society's asset, another time we are suffered as 負資產! (translation note: negative-equity)…. Obviously not only the local university students/ graduates suffer, the overseas ones (You too! you no longer worth as much as before. The norm changed), the sub-degree holders, the grassroots, the cleaners and guards working downstairs, and every manpower in HK too (the norm changed right, we've got price-cut, you've got price-cut too), EXCEPT THOSE WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT APPARENTLY…. because the government never has a sense of how things outside 政府合處 (translation note: central government office building) is doing! They never put themselves as the ruling ones and never thought they have so much influence on how the marketer's perception! If they think they got no influence to the society, why the hell we pay tax and let them in the ruling chair! DOWN DOWN 4-TSANGS!
Smokers are even more outraged as the cigarette tax has increased by 50%. Kahui complains:
Even if you have a job, you are worried about getting fired soon. Well… you want to relax by having a cigarette, but the fxxking government rises the tax, and so heavily!
Got nothing to eat / smoke, we can only walk through the window instead of the door! (translation note: meaning kill oneself)
Why don't the government officials rise their wine tax?
Having so high a salary and enjoying cheap wine.
You pay the game by yourself, sxxker.
Helping university graduates with 2000,
And be so sure that companies won't fire other employees.
How do you know?
If they got fired, are you going to take them in?
Among the political parties in the Legislative council, probably only the League of Social Democrats could show the grassroots’ frustration by interrupting John Tsang from reading his report (see the youtube here):
However, their action has been criticized by the government, pro-establishment politicians and the pan-democratic alliance. Dadazim, a journalist comments that LSD can attract grassroots support more than the pan-dem's “rationalists”, even though it is a sign of despair towards local politics:
Seeing the three LSD guys scold at John Tsang, it is rather entertaining. The grassroots can only depend on themselves, they seldom have expectation on the government high ranking officials. You can't deny that many grassroots would love to see John Tsang's stunned expression.