Egypt: Jihad Hackers

Is Jihad spilling from the ground on to the virtual world? Egyptian blogger Marwa Rakha writes here (and here) about how the internet has affected the ongoing debate between the secular and Islamic camps in Egypt.

She writes:

It is no big secret that the number of Egyptians who believe that Egypt should become a secular nation are increasing. Mainly, intellectual bilingual well-educated people have realized that inter-faith strives are holding the country back.

And for sure both Secular and Religious Egyptians along with their debates and struggles have made their presence felt in the blogosphere and on Facebook groups. Rakha explains:

On the other hand, the number of Islamic fundamentalists and Muslim Brothers is increasing. Their jihad methods have evolved from swords, bombs, banners, stickers, and tapes to invade the world wide web.

And for sure there are more weapons both camps can use besides arguments and discussions on the internet battlefield. Rakha explains:

Facebook's liberal activists were the main target of hackers who took over accounts, changed the name of the owner, sent out messages to his or her friends, deleted the account altogether, sabotaged his or her groups, and used obscene pictures and words to totally defame that person.
Groups that were hacked began posting offensive messages about the admins who lost control over the group and the hackers had more access to more people who do not think that Egypt is an Islamic country. Other than hacking, they created fake accounts that mimicked those of known liberal writers and activists.
One of the activists said “my account was hacked which is painful, especially that I had previously lost all my content while joining a network and I had to start all over”
Another activist said “I personally suggest for group owners to have always a backup account as well and both of them admins; I learnt this tip from other group owners. As for not using my own self I don't like the idea. I prefer being me, if there are sick people out there its their problem. Facebook was meant for us to get together decently and to get to know each other normally; if I need to go through all this hassle I'd rather then not use it at all.”


  • Ahmad

    (Off topic)

    The explanation by of the word “jihad” correctly couples it with the word “crusade” as a strife for self perfection, or struggle for a [just] cause, as well as a holy war in the name of religion.

    However, while the word “crusade” seems to have had its roots in the infamous military campaigns of the middle ages, before it was generalised, the Arabic word “jihad” has the opposite history.

    “Jihad” was a general term referring to personal/community strife for betterment, and later gained the specific meaning of holy war against the nations’ enemies, which definition – according to the time this usage came into existence – were people of other non-muslim nations.

  • What Ahmad says is true and it’s neccesary to be spread so that people know the difference between the real ‘jihad’ and the violent jihad.

    I’d say also that is very dangerous mixing History (crusades of middle age and mujahidin nowadays) and making parallelism, it’s dangerous only because there’re some people using this concepts as an excuse to continue attacking arab countries and islam.

    Happy A’Id for all the muslims… Kollo sana wentuh tayibin. Sa’id ‘Aid!!!

  • […] مدون. Blog owners took extreme measures to protect their blogs and to warn others of fraudulent blogs and fake profiles. So as you can see, a blogger has become a social and political criminal whose only crime is being […]

  • […] hanno preso misure estreme onde tutelare i propri blog e avvertire gli altri dell'esistenza di blog fraudolenti e profili falsi [in]. Come si può vedere, il blogger è diventato un criminale sociale e politico il cui unico […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.