Japan: Bloggers on food crisis feast, G8 over Skype?

The G8 Summit at Toyako, Hokkaido [ja], ended on June 9th after three days of meetings, leaving a bitter aftertaste for some bloggers in Japan. With a total cost for organization and security estimated as enough to treat millions of HIV patients, and protests by thousands of farmers and activists from around the world, the event was not without its controversy.

The G8 Summit - New CHITOSE airport (in Sapporo)
The G8 Summit – New CHITOSE airport (from Flickr user mujitra) CC-BY

Many bloggers questioned the high costs of the event, pointing out how environmentally unfriendly it was. Blogger gooorii, on the other hand, considered some of the outcomes of the G8 summit to have been positive:


With such a pile of issues to be discussed, state leaders can have discussions but I don't think that they will be able to come to a conclusion very easily. As a just viewpoint from an international perspective, the inclusion of the “abduction issue” in the Leaders’ Statement, and the condemnation of the illegitimate presidential election in Zimbabwe in a joint declaration, place pressure on the countries concerned, and this I think is a good thing.


The greenhouse gas issue, which was an important topic this time, was discussed by the G8 on the second day. Mr. Fukuda was hoping to set a longterm goal of a 50% reduction by 2050, but the U.S. suggested that “discussions without major CO2 producing countries (China, India, Brazil, etc) are pointless” and apparently he was not able to get approval from the U.S., which I think is obvious.



But in any case, the need for reduction measures is the same for each country, so I think that the mass CO2 producers meeting on the third day, sitting at the same table, will all be at the same starting line for beginning discussions.

The Oxfam G8 Big Heads at Big Letters Performance
The Oxfam G8 Big Heads at Big Letters Performance (from the Oxfam Flickr page) CC-BY-NC-ND

Blogger jg96aqkg, meanwhile, points out the irony of the G8 dinner:


Apparently subjects including environmental problems, countermeasures against global warming, the rise in petroleum prices, the food crisis and North Korea's nuclear problem were discussed, but as an ordinary person I have no idea what sort of effectiveness this will have.


Some media criticized [the meeting], questioning whether they [the G8] understand the feelings of people who are suffering from hunger as [the G8 attendees] feast on food heaped on at tables in the conference venue where the food crisis was discussed.


They are participating to represent their country so I couldn't care less what kind of luxurious meals they are eating, but I hope they will do this in a way that respects the dignity of life of every person in the world.

Challenge the G8 Peace Walk
Challenge the G8 Peace Walk (from Flickr user skasuga) CC-BY-NC-SA

Blogger mkj2 also picks up on the theme of the G8 feast, and writes:


The story about the dinner that's going to be served for the leaders.
That there is going to be a lot of locally produced food on menu with good stuff like crab and asparagus.


I am not really bitching about the food.
From the food to security and what not, a large amount of taxpayer's money is spent.
That itself is ok.
Because leaders from around the world are gathering and discussing various issues.


Please, for god's sake.
With so much money and effort put into it, if the gasoline prices do not go down, and the food prices do not go down, how are they going to take responsibility [for all of this]?

Toyako from the windsor hotel
Toyako from the windsor hotel (where the G8 Summit meetings were held, by Flickr user veroyama) CC-BY

Finally, blogger fookpaktsuen makes a novel proposal:

四国や九州からの警察の動員2万人余。……で地球温暖化が主要議題、ならこのサミット開催こそ「地球に優しくない」のが事実。もう国連活動に収斂されていいのでは? テロ襲撃が危険視されるなら各国首脳が一同に介せずSkypeで会議すれば良し。会場からほど遠き農牧地帯で120名のサミット反対デモにデモ参加者上回る数の警官が防備。異常。

Over 20,000 police officers were mobilized from Shikoku and Kyushu… and global warming is the main agenda, while the fact is that holding this summit is itself “earth-unfriendly”. Can't they just converge this within UN activities? If terrorist attacks are considered a threat, then instead of all state leaders getting together, it's better to have the meeting over Skype. The number of police on defense was larger than that of the 120 protesters in the anti-Summit demonstration, [which took place] in a rural area far away from the summit. It's absurd.

(For more pictures of the G8 protests, see pics at the account of Flickr user Powless.)


Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.