Pakistan: Goodbye Musharraf!

With the results of the elections in Pakistan becoming more clear, it is obvious that Musharraf, despite his promises hasn't won the confidence of the voters. Crow's Nest writes, reflecting on those associated with Musharraf.

In the election results of the year 33 former ministers who were closely associated with Musharraf have lost their seats. PML-Q has suffered losses to the seats of those who were stalwarts of the previous administration and were thought to be close to Musharraf himself. the results express more so a disgust and hatred with Musharraf and anything even closely related to him.

Meanwhile, contrary to expectations and despite the flaws, the electoral process appears to have been relatively free of rigging. KO writes

It seems like every single political commentator (which these days is most of Pakistan) was wrong about the elections being heavily rigged.

To be fair, there was a massive and transparent attempt at rigging by the outgoing government, and it would have been enough if the results had been closer – but the difference is so vast in the actual polling results that the rigging was just not enough!

Picked Politics has an account of a British resident.

I spent the whole days on roads, visiting different polling booths. The turn-out was slow but at some booths I saw crowds. In particular, seeing women voters in large numbers was reassuring. I also met British residents like myself, keen on voting. There were also Pakistani American and Pakistani Australian voters.

It was refreshing to see and talk to them but it was not surprising. Pakistan politics over the past few years have become international news with the world’s eyes focused on the region. These European and American residents of Pakistani origin were keen on making a difference.

Over at Metroblogging Lahore, the blog discusses the wins and losses in the city. The Pakistani Spectator seems to think that the outcome of this election signals a departure from tyranny. Pak Tea House asserts that the process and the outcome are a clear sign that the people of Pakistan have chosen to reject extremism of any kind.

They undo the Musharraf paradigm of ousting the two mainstream parties from the political arena; and instituting real democracy that is hostage to the bogey of Islamism and local feudal cliques through non-party local governments.

These elections are also a slap on the face of the global corporate media (and their backers, the global military machine) that had painted Pakistan as a breeding ground for Islamic extremism and dare I say terrorism.

Sepia Mutiny greets the news with a little caution, asking if this really is victory for the people of Pakistan.

So what will we see play out in Pakistan? There will be celebrations for a few weeks. Everyone will denigrate Musharraf some more for good measure. Then the people will see that their new democracy, probably composed of a weak and continually warring “coalition,” isn’t all that and that their leaders are as corrupt as they were the first time around. Eventually the new general in charge of the army will be forced to take over, just like Musharraf did eight years ago.


  • […] 21, 2008 Glad that our voice, faint as it might be, is being […]

  • I don’t think that the President should depart at this stage. He must continue. Pervez Musharraf has done some of the best works for the country. Massive development work was done on unprecedented scale even in neglected provinces like Baluchistan.

    Gawadar Port shall always be his big achievement. It is another thing that a thankless nation refuse to acknowledge his services. We cannot condemn President Musharraf just because of his military antecedents. It was the Pakistani nation who welcomed him when he arrived. We have to judge him upon his achievement, the works which he did while in office.

    For nearly eight years everything was good. There was nothing against the President. There was visible signs of progress and prosperity in the country. It was only after the Supreme Court issue and the unprecedented price hike of petroleum products that political parties who had lost all hopes of launching a successful campaign against him, did find an issue to talk about.

    Let me ask only one question to those who oppose the President? Does the president control the petrol prices internationally? If they answer in yes, then why have the prices not been lowered after the formation of the new government. In the petrol prices have been increased many times in a short period.

    At least President Musharraf is not accused to financial embazzlement

  • Mohammad Hussain

    With criminal military dictator Musharraf’s resignation the message should be loud and clear. It should be even louder since there will be no Bush-Cheney crooked duo to prop up illegitimate illegal unelected undemocratic power-grabbers in South Asia any longer. Under a most likely democratic US presidency in 2009 there will be major shift in US foreign policy. Things wouldn’t have changed much if Hillary Clinton had got the democratic nomination. In that case the Bush policy of muscle-flexing and propping up of military dictators and NGOs would have continued.

    Placing the national ID under the home ministry and establishing a spying cell on politicians under the police even after having a ISI-styled DFI in Bangladesh is taking us back to the Musharraf days just after his overthrow of Nawaz Sharif unconstitutionally.

    Are we actually backpeddling to the military days? Was this Bangladesh caretaker setup in 2007 a farce to deceive the people? In that case a violent overthrow of totalitarianism reminiscent of 1991 is imminent.

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.