Malaysia: Blogger Detained by Police

Several Malaysian bloggers are reporting that blogger Nat (Nathaniel) Tan of jelas.info was detained earlier today (July 13) by Malaysian police . KTEmoc writes

Police took Nathaniel Tan of PKR away for questioning, without providing any reason at all. They entered his office at about 4.45 pm today, and told Tan to follow them to the Bukit Aman police headquarters. The policemen also requested that Tan bring his notebook computer with him. It is believed that he is being questioned on matters relating to certain postings on the Internet.

Nathaniel works for a political party called Parti Keadilan Rakyat or PKR. Tian Chua, the information chief of PKR offers some background information on Nathaniel Tan.

Nathaniel is a 27 year old graduate from Harvard University. We began to know each other last year and became good friend. Early this year, I recruited him to work under KeADILan’s Information Bureau.

Free Nathaniel
Image from Mob's Crib

Police initially denied having taken Nathaniel but later at night they admitted to it. Malaysian bloggers find the action puzzling. Maverick SM commenting on a post at Mob's Crib says

This is truly a sad day for democracy in Malaysia. Nat had never being subversive nor acted in anyway that would have threatened the security of the nation. How could the authorities be so misinformed? Democracy is dead!

Detained blogger's colleague John thinks that the establishment is trying to make an example out of Nathaniel for “those who dare to make a difference”.

There is also some speculation that one of Nathanial's post earlier this week (about an ongoing spat between the deputy internal security minister and the inspector general of police) might have caused the detention.

UPDATE: It seems that the police is looking for information on a comment that was left on Nathaniel's post on mentioned above. 4896 has an update on his blog .

Nathaniel's younger sister Cheryl is logging the latest developments on her own blog.

Links to bloggers talking about Nathaniel:

Elizabeth Wong

The Sensintrovert
Reduced and Recycled
Lucia Lai
Rocky's Bru
S.K.Thew
Susan Loone
Jeff Ooi
Politics 101 Malaysia
Bullets of Quills and Ink

25 comments

  • Dan

    I would like to be one of the first people to stand up and say a big thank you to Datuk Toh Kin Woon for your words quoted in the article “Gerakan Man: Don’t Gag Bloggers” in the New Straits Times. Although the government does not agree with what you are saying – the people in this country do agree with you and it is the people that the govenment work for and should respect.

    Please visit http://hygen.net/blog/?p=71 and post your thanks to Datuk Toh Kin Woon and show your support for Malaysian Bloggers & Malaysian human rights in general.

    Thanks!

  • Peter

    To Madhaterz (message 7),

    Look not much farther, and how could you forget North Korea and China? And Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Russia, Poland . . . perhaps as close to you as Singapore, Indonesia?

  • Dan

    Yes there are a few other countries that are as repressive as Malaysia aspires to be if they pass strict new laws as proposed.

    Looking at that list and the likes of North Korea and Iran etc… What kind of people want to build a nation associated with that kind of repression and breach of human rights?

    I think there must be something in the water at parliment in Malaysia!

  • deutscruber

    The law is the law so dear mr nat should know the law after all he works for a political party called Parti Keadilan Rakyat so dont they make sure that people who work for them know the law or what.

  • deutscruber

    Well he should not have spoken out against his Government. That is treason and traitorous in any country so Nat ought to apologise quickly and publicly to the Malaysian Government I am sure they could do without a Malaysian traitor in their midst. I mean they have a hard enough job as it is with all the different factions there so all Malaysians support your Country and that means your Government.

  • Peter

    deutscruber(message 15):

    Not in the USA, the UK, Germany, Japan, South Korea, even Taiwan . . . where any individual can freely speak against his or her government without fear of prosecution. SPEECH alone cannot constitute treason. Only speech coupled with ACTION can.

    UGH! Such small-minded governments who cannot deal with different opinions!

  • deutscruber

    Yes but Peter, he knew the Law and in all the countries you mentioned if you break the law you usually get areested so he broke the law intentionally, so what did he expect a medal, different countries different laws, obey the laws that are there and the authorities will give you no problem I am sure the Malaysian Government know what they are doing when they make these laws so it is for a reason and just because you don’t agree with that reason you shouldn’t break it just to act macho and make a name for himself among dissidents. They arrested him quite legally to prevent possible anarchy so prevention is better than cure with possible anarchists.

  • Trunks

    Very simple.
    An intolerant king is a TYRANT;
    An intolerant religion is a CULT!

  • deutscruber

    while you are beimg tolerant your political enemies will decipher that as weakness and will be intolerable themselves in their haste to topple you and the Government opponents and terrorists are the real intolerable ones stirring up unrest and Nat Tan is intolerable by being intolerant himself. So what is he? a bigger intolerant tyrant perhaps who is intolerant of the Government. That’s intolerance for you.

  • Peter

    Oh well, then in many ways anarchy is way better than absolute autocracy. I would never hesitate to celebrate whenever I see a totalitarian regime get toppled from its roots – like the former USSR, the European Eastern Bloc (concluding with Romania’s Nicolae Ceausescu).

    Above the law there is Right or Wrong. Merely being legal does not mean it is justifiable. Last year in Hong Kong our lame government passd a law in such a rush that “enabled” them to confiscate all domestic poultry in the territory without compensation. YES, It is “law.” So what? NO, It is WRONG!

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.