Debating Darfur: Bloggers question Sudanese ambassador to U.N.

“What does Sudan want?” “Who do you think are arming the rebels?” These deceptively simple questions were posed to the Sudanese ambassador to the United Nations by members of the panel at a Reuters Newsmaker event in New York on 24 May, 2007. His answers were evasive, and the debate was full of awkward moments. The ambassador even blamed the violent conflict in Darfur on climate change at one point. The other panelists disagreed.

Global Voices’ Sub-Saharan Africa Editor, Ndesanjo Macha, live-blogged the event and was invited to pose questions directly from Sudanese bloggers in the Q&A session.

Reuters Newsmaker event New York Ndesanjo and Rebecca blogging

There was a quiet gasp from the audience of journalists and opinion-makers when they heard where the questions were coming from. New York is very, very far away from Darfur. Somehow it brought the room closer to the tragedy to know someone in the region was listening.

powered by ODEO Ndesanjo asks question

Here is the second question Ndesanjo asked, right before the end:

powered by ODEO

At the last Reuters Newsmaker event there was a live webcast which made it easier for bloggers to listen and ask questions while it was happening. This time, the full audio recording of the event has been added to the Reuters website later (here) and video clip (here). Just click to see how depressingly far from any resolution the conflict is.

The speakers represented the US Department of State (Lauren Landis), the United Nations (Mia Farrow), the International Crisis Group (John Prendergast), and NBC News (Ann Curry).

“Will you say yes to peacekeepers?” asked the moderator. The ambassador hesitated. “Yes, for African Union peacekeepers supported by the United Nations,” but it was a conditional response. He said he only wanted peacekeepers, after durable peace was established (good luck).

“It’s their policy to destroy that rebellion by killing the supporters. They don’t want witnesses. They don’t want an effective peacekeeping force,” said Prendergast. He called for sanctions against individual senior leaders. And he called them war criminals. “Until there is a cost for continuing to arm militias they will continue the killing in the villages. They will continue bombing civilian targets,” he said.

I blogged the event on openDemocracy's blog. And here's the Reuters account.


  • Raye Howard

    U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said that his top priority is to make ‘swift movement and progress on Darfur issues’ and I believe he will. But still I wonder how long should we stay on this dialogue track? How many people will die before our global community stops talking and moves in to provide protection for our children. Doesn’t the severe human rights violations occurring here require immediate action?

  • Annah

    How many people died before the UN intervened in Rwanda? How many must die in Kenya before the UN sees fit to send a peacekeeping force?

  • Awab Almalik

    The UN don’t understand that there are places that they cant reach due to tribal disputes they have more co-operation with the Sudanese Government and charities that wont send in helicopters in fear of having them shot down need to remember its not about how much money you lose its about how many people you reach

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.