Close

Support Global Voices

To stay independent, free, and sustainable, our community needs the help of friends and readers like you.

Donate now »

Ukraine: Forecasts

Taras Kuzio thinks there's a chance for Yulia Tymoshenko to become Ukraine's prime minister again.

5 comments

  • Ukraine Crisis: Recent Poll indicates no change in outcome of new election

    A public opinion poll taken the day after the Presidents decree calling fresh parliamentary elections indicates no change in the outcome of fresh elections. Up to 36 percent of Ukrainians will be disenfranchised by Ukraine’s electoral system as a result of Ukraine’s 3% threshold quota. Governing Coalition (223 to 243) Orange Opposition (174 to 207)

  • One big hurdle, Ukraine’s Constitutional Court

    Monday, April 09, 2007
    PACE: Ukrainian president had not enough legal grounds to dissolve the parliament

    Parliamentary Assembly Council of Europe (PACE) monitoring committee co-reporter Renate Wohlwend believes that the Ukrainian president had not enough legal grounds to dissolve the parliament

    http://ukrainetoday.blogspot.com

    The announcement by PACE is a serious blow to Yulia Tymoshenko and the President’s campaign for fresh Parliamentary elections. PACE had no alternative but to express its concerns over the constitutionality of the President’s decree dismissing Ukraine’s democratically elected Parliament. The dismissal of a Parliament by a head of state sets a very dangerous precedence that effects not just Ukraine but also Western democracy. Most Western parliamentary democracies have very strict limitations on the right of a head of state to dismiss a parliament.

    Yulia Tymoshenko had hoped that Europe would back the oppositions call for fresh elections. It has not.

    PACE has made the correct call. The actions of the President is a last gasp of a failed Presidency. The consequences of his actions seriously undermines Ukraine’s democratic development and rule of law.

    Media reports over the weekend have indicated that the President had met (in secrete) with members of the Constitutional Court on Friday in an attempt to influence the determination of the Court. Yushchenko wants the Court to defer its consideration and determination no the governments appeal. The President is of the false belief that if the Court delays its decision long enough the elections process will be secured and the President if need be will declare a state of emergency if protests continue.

    There are also reports that the President is ordering the Military to take control of the Parliament should the conflict continue and elections are not held.

    The Constitutional Court must not bow to pressure from the Office of the President. It must rule on the validity of the President’s actions according to rule of law. Any different or delay in it’s decision would results in ongoing conflict and division.

    – Extract Copy of News aralce published on RegNum —

    The main cause of the presidential decision [to dissolve the parliament] was his attempt to cease MPs changing their factions. I am afraid, legally, it is not enough to dissolve the parliament,” Renate Wohlwend said. The PACE co-reporter expressed hope that Ukraine’s Constitutional Court would speed up its consideration of the question whether Yushchenko’s decree was constitutional. “I am afraid, if it takes months for the Constitutional Court to rule whether the president was right or wrong, clashes in the streets can start between those, who support the opposition, and those, who support Yanukovich,” Renate Wohlwend believes.

    According to her, early elections will not help in settling the problem. “If the Constitutional Court decides to support the elections, they must be conducted. After the elections, Ukraine will be brought back to 2-3 years backwards in development of its democratic institutions and establishment of the rule of law,” Ms. Wohlwend said. “If the decree is pronounced unconstitutional, President Yushchenko will have to resign,” the PACE co-reporter believes.

    On April 2, the power crisis in Ukraine developed into a new stage. President Viktor Yushchenko signed a decree to dissolve the Supreme Rada and appointed a date for the early elections, May 27. The parliament and the government agreed to obey the decree, only if the Constitutional Court decides the decree does not breach the constitution. On April 5, Ukraine’s Constitutional Court confirmed that it opened the case on determining whether President Viktor Yushchenko’s decree to dissolve the Supreme Rada was constitutional and pronounced the case urgent.

  • Hello

    39% —- I thought that 20% from from the March Parliamentary elections was significant (as none of them were represented in the Parliament) but close to 40% is something for me to really reel from.

    39% is a powerful political bloc in its own right! and they will have NO voice in govt. So whose govt will this be?

    Certainly NOT of the people FOR the people. Perhaps a “POD” “Party of the Disenfranchised”?

    This is horrific news indeed.

  • Hello

    My deepest apologies pls. correct my comment post – it is 36% not 39%.

  • Hello: i agree 22% of the electorate was disenfranchised in the March Parliamentary elections.

    One possible alternative worthy of consideration would be the creation of 50 local district based electorates each electorate returning nine members of parliament on a 10% quota and the introduction of a preferential voting system where voters allocate in order of their preference (1, 2, 3 etc) candidates of their choice. There would not be a huge proliferation of minor parties. Such a system would do away with the imperative mandate system and would ensure that those elected are truly representatives of their electorate as opposed to just being party nominated hacks. The costs of campaigning for elections would be significantly cheaper and the introduction of preferential voting would ensure that all seats are allocated proportionally according to the voters choice.

    Adoption of preferential voting would also avoid the need to hold run-off ballots for the election of President saving 100’s of Millions of dollars in direct and indirect costs.

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Love reading Global Voices?

Help us understand our readers by completing a quick survey »

Close