China: Cultural Revolution turns forty · Global Voices
John Kennedy

One interesting aspect of blogging in China is that the strict controls on newspapers, magazines, television and news websites from time-to-time leaves many bloggers with the responsibility and freedom to determine and define coverage of major issues and stories while mainstream media, despite all their resources, have no choice but to remain silent.
May 16 this year is one of those such times. Forty years ago today, Mao Zedong issued the infamous ‘notice’, a manifesto of sorts, which sparked the power and class struggles that kept the Cultural Revolution going and saw millions of lives wasted until his death in 1976.
The competition one would normally see between rival media outlets seems to have been left behind by Chinese bloggers for a more results-based sharing model in which content is seldom repeated and individuals pursue their own interests which leads to a greater whole.
Starting off strongly but informatively is the Big Shapeless Bull (大牛无形) blogger who posts and translates two American magazine covers from the mid-1960s and suggests better ways to search for Cultural Revolution-related information online:
今天是个纪念日…知道这个日子而故意不说或者回避,甚至要打击知道这个日子并且说出来的人,比希特勒更法西斯.
顺便说一下,在今天的百度,你不可能用文化大革 命直接搜索出你要的东西,百度会告诉你:您输入的关键词可能涉及不符合相关法律法规的内容。
The Democratic China Blog II blogger seems to have received this advice as a post today contains a documentary on the Cultural Revolution from Hong Kong public television station RTHK, as well as some astute blogmentary:
文革是中共的官场现形记,2000万无辜中国人在文革非正常死亡.邓小平说过:”文革这样的事在英国、法国、美国这些西方国家是不可能发生的.”我们需要弄清的是WHY?!
On journalist-blogger Priest Liu's MSN Spaces blog we see a full copy of the forementioned notice [zh], matched by veteran blogger Nick Wong but also including the numerous additions to the document as the goal of the Cultural Revolution took its many twists and turns. Other posts from earlier in the week leading up to today include mention of China's first ever Cultural Revolution museum which opened late last year in Shantou, just northeast of Hong Kong and a look at Guo Yushan's Sohu blog dedicated to martyrs of the revolution. A short historical timeline of the ten years (1966-1976) the Cultural Revolution spanned can also be found on Lian Yue's Eighth Continent blog.
Jxhill's MSN Spaces blog gives a impressive description of the impact the Cultural Revolution had on the national psyche, and how the spiritual fallout still affects Chinese today:
十年文革，不仅造成中国社会大混乱，导致中国经济濒临崩溃边缘，这场打着「文化」旗号的运动对中国传统文化的破坏之深、对人性的戕害之烈、对人的精神的扭曲之重，亦是亘古以来所仅见。在文革结束30年后的今天，其遗风与遗害仍随时随处或隐或显地出现。
文革后，许多国人缺乏信仰，精神萎靡。当局为重塑人们的精神，发起「精神文明建设」，从「五讲四美三热爱」到最近胡锦涛倡导的「八荣八耻」，**对精神文明的塑造，不可谓不重视，然而收效甚微。人们之间关系冷漠，拜金主义盛行，法制观念淡薄，为牟一己之利而不择手段等等，这与文革的破坏与遗害均难脱干系。
At the River of China blog we see a post written for Mother's Day but focusing on the blogger's family life against the backdrop of growing up in the midst of those turbulent times:
幼时的那些日子，家里总是入不敷出，母亲很精确地计算花出去的每分钱，但到了月末，必然还是要厚起脸皮去向邻居借个五毛一块的度过最后那两天。而再大些的我已经不再满足于单调简陋的饮食，在吃过第一口肉之后，我开始对肉产生了浓厚兴趣，每次经过肉铺，脚便象钉住一样死死立在那里，然后乞求地望着母亲，每当这个时候，母亲总是会眼中噙满泪。很多年以后我才明白自己的无知为母亲带来的是怎样的心灵上的折磨与摧残。
And the discussion is put on a more personal level in a post from the Migratory Fool with a recount of a well-known story of one young man who was executed for refusing to renounce an essay he had written.
“血统论” 的出现, 使许多“出身不好”的青年所受到无端的打击和迫害。许多敢怒不敢言。 有一位年轻人, 挺身而出, 公开化发表了公开发表了批判血统论的论文《出身论》。遇罗克一针见血的指出：“一个新的特权阶层形成了，一个新的受歧视的阶层也随之形成了。而这又是先天的，是无法更改的。”在文章最后他号召：“一切受压抑的革命青年，起来勇敢战斗吧！”文章一问世，就就在社会上引起了巨大反响, 引起千百万人的共鸣。但也冒犯了文革当局。遇罗克一九六八年初被捕入狱，七零年三月五日惨遭处决，年仅27岁。
遇罗克之弟遇罗文撰写的长篇纪实文学《我家》中记述了一次姐弟间的谈话：“有一天弟弟对姐姐诉说了心中的烦闷，姐姐说：‘妈妈、爸爸反右时只顾自己痛快，说了几句真话，害得我们跟着受 罪。’一旁看书的罗克插话道：‘不要责怪父母。他们说真话有什么错？我看他们说得太少了。整个社会上说真话的人也太少了。如果大家都说真话，不说假话，就不会有这种不平。何况即使真是父母错了，也不能由子女承担责任。’”
“Reading a book beside her, Luoke jumped in to say: ‘don't blame mom and dad. They told the truth—what's wrong with that? The way I see it, they said too little. All of society tells too little of the truth. If everyone just spoke the truth, stopped telling lies, there just wouldn't be this kind of injustice. In any event, even if our parents really are mistaken, us children can't be held responsible.'”