In September last year, Chinese authorities released a new set of regulations aimed at websites and blogs which show signs of democratic leanings or any behavior which might otherwise threaten the country's one-party rulers.
From Sophia Beach at China Digital Times :
It is worth noting that these new regulations include two additional categories of forbidden content compared with previously released regulations : 1) information inciting illegal assemblies, demonstrations, marches, or gatherings to disturb social order and 2) information released in the name of “illegal civil organizations.” This is an apparent attempt to target the capacity to organize online .
Following the design of this new law, online publishing in China has devolved into what increasingly appears to be something of a Whack-a-mole  war, with blogs and BBS’ getting smacked right back down just as they start to move up.
A second report from CDT  in March showed how these new rules led to the shutdown of three large Chinese websites: Angry Youth  forum (January 19), the Chinese Election and Governance Web  (March 7) and intellectual hotspot Aegean Sea  (March 9). A post from the EastSouthNorthWest blogger  (#047) in March linked these shutdowns to the cases of then-missing AIDS activist Hu Jia and Beijing or Bust blogger and documentarian Wu Hao, currently being held illegally by Chinese authorities .
Aside from growing tighter in recent months, the vice has also started clamping down on those who cast the mould, temper the steel, assemble the parts and package the finished product. The nature of the steadily-increasing number of rules suggest an increasingly desperate government, particularly with the forced shutdown in late February this year—just two months short of its one year anniversary which would have been this May 1—of the working class-oriented and legally-registered China Worker Web  whose official crime was in not having RMB 10,000,000 (USD 1,248,200) in the bank.
“They claim this is a controversial website, one that is political in content. Recently a law was passed that such websites must meet certain conditions before being set up: you need to have 10 million yuan (1.2 million US dollars) to register your site. Well, I haven't got that kind of money. As you can see in the announcement that we put out on our website, we stated that we are average working people, not in possession of 10 million yuan.
On one of our forums, someone suggested that, since there have been many millions of state workers laid off in the last decade, each one of them can invest 1 yuan and save the China Workers’ website!
If it were allowed, I could definitely find the support needed from workers to raise that fee. But the Party would allow no such thing. A Chinese student studying in the US wrote a piece in response asking, ‘Does this mean that if you have no money you have no right to speak your opinion?’ Workers should have the same right to expression that elite business owners have.”
Despite what the Chinese constitution  says, it's not only farmers and factory workers who find themselves having to fight for that right. Civil rights lawyer Chen Yongmiao is in a position to speak on that.
Following the closure of Aegean Sea, he filed a law suit which challenges the constitutionality of giving the popular forum the hatchet job and has been giving updates on the lawsuit on his blog . The spokesperson for the group of civil rights lawyers working on behalf of the website, although the latest development in the case has been the refusal of Chinese courts to launch an investigation into the alleged violation of the Constitution in the closing down of Aegean Sea, Chen blogs on. In a post dated April 20 , he says:
While the Chinese Worker Web plight has gotten plenty of play on Chinese BBS’, there seems to be more talk of it on Taiwan blogs than on their Chinese counterparts. Li Wenqin, in a post dated February 25 , blogs the story of how she discovered the loss of one of her favorite bookmarked sites:
From an editorial on alternative media news site CoolLoud dated May 1, we see a hand stretched out not just in sympathy, but in solidarity as well: