See all those languages up there? We translate Global Voices stories to make the world's citizen media available to everyone.

Learn more about Lingua Translation  »

Pakistan: Blog-o-reaction

Well, by now, everyone is well aware of the controversy that resulted from the publication of caricatures of Prophet Mohammad, and the resulting protests that have occurred around the world.

Being a Muslim, I naturally found the cartoons offensive, so no big surprise there. But I also understand and support the right of ‘freedom of expression’, and realize that it is unrealistic to expect everyone to conform to the unwritten rule of human decorum and not ridicule someone's faith or belief system. I also think that it does not reflect very positively on one's intellect, when one decides to satirize a whole religion because of one's aversion to its selected extremist followers. But hey, that's just me.

I also feel very strongly that protesting such a derision of one's faith, should be restricted to verbal or written discourse and not breaking windows, burning flags, effigies or buildings. But hey, that's just me.

I protested the only way I thought logical, by writing about and exercising my own ‘freedom of expression’, and so did many Pakistani bloggers, some of whom are listed below:

Suspect Paki comments on the reaction in England; Teeth Maestro highlights the incident and cartoons in question; Journey presents his own perspective; Fahd Mirza details his hurtful and angered response; and I comment on the Prime Minister's speech.

I want to end my sermon with a true parable of the author, Salman Rushdie. He wrote a book a called Satanic Verses which caused controversy upon publication, as many Muslims considered it blasphemous. Rushdie was surprised by the extreme reaction (death threat – extremists issuing fatwa against Rushdie) to the book and believed he had the right to do so because it was his ‘free speech and freedom of expression’, and people just need to basically chill out.

Many years later a journalist commented on Rushdie's wife which caused controversy upon publication, as Rushdie considered it undignified. The journalist was surprised by the extreme reaction (death threat – Rushdie promising to beat the journalist with a baseball bat) to the article and believed he had the right to do so because it was his ‘free speech and his freedom of expression’ and Rushdie just needs to basically chill out.

So what have we learned from this story. That no matter how intellectual or artistic you considered your work to be, if you ridicule something or someone people love, respect or consider sacred (the Prophet for Muslims, the wife for Rushdie), you are bound to get a furious reaction in return, so don't be surprised.

5 comments

  • It is actually the media which intially started the fiasco and now has feuled the hunger for a reaction by the Muslim world.

    I think we as Muslims should not react by threats or burning buildings, it just makes the matter worse. But how can you prevent an religiously charged nation when you have attacked (by you I mean the eurpoean media) one of its own religious symoblic idols – Prophet Muhammed (PBUH), its like hitting below the belt (& very hard)

  • An interesting side note to this whole controversy comes from the Guardian Unlimited (dated Feb 06, 06):

    “Jyllands-Posten, the Danish newspaper that first published the cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that have caused a storm of protest throughout the Islamic world, refused to run drawings lampooning Jesus Christ, it has emerged today.

    The Danish daily turned down the cartoons of Christ three years ago, on the grounds that they could be offensive to readers and were not funny.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1703501,00.html

  • Now is the high time that sanity should prevail in all the camps and violence must be avoided at all costs. Violence and riots will only aggravate the problem. No one in his/her right mind can deny that the publication of cartoons was callous and needless.

    Peace and love.

  • bobbie

    Re: http://www.sorrynorwaydenmark.com/advancedguestbook/index.php

    RE: WE ARE SORRY

    Those “young youthful Arabs” in disguise made a suggestion that a few violent ones should not speak for or be representative of the whole, yet they themselves are apologizing on behalf of the entire Arab population.

    They too are trying to generate a loud sensational noise and how very hypocritical!

  • Cool sensible post. Am a Rushdie fan for his linguistics. His politics and personal life need much to be desired. This has to nothing to do with my having been born into a Muslim household; so was Salman.

    My own view on this appears in http://www.kidvai.com/zak/jottings.html

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices
* = required field
Email Frequency



No thanks, show me the site