Singapore metablog and a discussion on Linking Policies

Lately there has been a flurry of debates online about Singapore metablog,‘s linking policy, and its policy of not asking for permission before linking people's blog posts.

Some of the debates go right to the heart of issues like whether it is an accepted practice to link to blogs without the need for asking for permission, whether is is morally acceptable, and privacy issues.

The post has attracted high readership and a great deal of participation in the comments section. There are also many spillover posts in other Singapore blogs on this matter. Try Geekazoid who is very upset at having been linked without permission (very strong language).

Idle Days, one of Tomorrow‘s editors, posts some reaction to the controversy. An excerpt:

All I can say that this ‘debate’ has been of much interesting and in some ways slightly baffling one to me (for all the reasons I have stated here) and of course when you look at metablogs like boing boing, Slashdot, Metafilter, etc, you hardly see cries of foul play in their comments. If readers and those bloggers whose posts have appeared in these metablogs demanded permission, they would have gone the way of the dinosaur by now. Perhaps as Singaporean bloggers, we simply don’t get blogging after all.

Adrian Loo at A Life Uncommon finds such reactions arrogant:

Tomorrow, in propounding its linking policy appears to have been caught up in its own expectations of its own rights, without due regard to the rights of others, many of whom provide the substance from which Tomorrow draws its breath.

An anonymous commenter at Adrian Loo's blog disagrees:

Pray tell, how could it be that they are advocating an absolute rights model which theirs triumph over all others when the very tag (“tomorrow I’m not free”) that they respect is created by a blogger, not themselves? If that’s not acceptance and respect of bloggers who do not want to be linked, I don’t know what is.

“tomorrow I’m not free” is a logo some bloggers use to indicate that they do not wish to be linked to by

The trackbacks beneath's linking policy post show just some of the Singapore blogs and forums discussing this topic (with passionate comments and debates igniting at these places as well). There are other Singapore blogs that discuss this issue, but because those blog owners have indicated that they do not wish to be linked by, they are not linked to.

What do bloggers around the world think of this debate? Are similar problems cropping up in other countries? Please hit the “comments” button and let us know!!


  • […] Global Voices Online » Blog Archive » Singapore metablog and a discussion on Linking Policies theory.isthereason »’s linking policy misses the point […]

  • How long does it take to send out and email asking permission? I think this whole discussion is redundant. Just ask for permission, if they say yes…link them. If they say no, accept it and get on with life.

  • […] We also talked about the things we believed in – that the internet was invented in order that people could link to each other without asking for permission, that if you think your blog is private, you’re seriously deluded, and that you do not build communities with blogs, you just help communities communicate better. […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.

Receive great stories from around the world directly in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the best of Global Voices!

Submitted addresses will be confirmed by email, and used only to keep you up to date about Global Voices and our mission. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Newsletter powered by Mailchimp (Privacy Policy and Terms).

* = required field
Email Frequency

No thanks, show me the site